Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characterizing flood hazard risk in data-scarce areas, using a remote sensing and GIS-based flood hazard index

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency in occurrence and severity of floods has increased globally. However, many regions around the globe, especially in developing countries, lack the necessary field monitoring data to characterize flood hazard risk. This paper puts forward methodology for developing flood hazard maps that define flood hazard risk, using a remote sensing and GIS-based flood hazard index (FHI), for the Nyamwamba watershed in western Uganda. The FHI was compiled using analytical hierarchy process and considered slope, flow accumulation, drainage network density, distance from drainage channel, geology, land use/cover and rainfall intensity as the flood causative factors. These factors were derived from Landsat, SRTM and PERSIANN remote sensing data products, except for geology that requires field data. The resultant composite FHI yielded a flood hazard map pointing out that over 11 and 18% of the study area was very highly and highly susceptible to flooding, respectively, while the remaining area ranged from medium to very low risk. The resulting flood hazard map was further verified using inundation area of a historical flood event in the study area. The proposed methodology was effective in producing a flood hazard map at the watershed local scale, in a data-scarce region, useful in devising flood mitigation measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aich V, Liersch S, Vetter T, Andersson J, Müller E, Hattermann F (2015) Climate or land use?—attribution of changes in river flooding in the Sahel Zone. Water 7:2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (2001) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, vol 964. Geological survey professional paper. US Government Printing Office First Printing, 1976

  • Armah FA, Yawson DO, Yengoh GT, Odoi JO, Afrifa EK (2010) Impact of floods on livelihoods and vulnerability of natural resource dependent communities in Northern Ghana. Water 2:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2016) The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Clim Change 134:387–401. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnoldus H (1980) An approximation of the rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. An approximation of the rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation, pp 127–132

  • Asadullah A, McIntyre N, Kigobe M (2008) Evaluation of five satellite products for estimation of rainfall over Uganda/Evaluation de cinq produits satellitaires pour l’estimation des précipitations en Ouganda. Hydrol Sci J 53:1137–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asare-Kyei D, Forkuor G, Venus V (2015) Modeling flood hazard zones at the sub-district level with the rational model integrated with GIS and remote sensing approaches. Water 7:3531–3564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashouri H et al (2015) PERSIANN-CDR: daily precipitation climate data record from multisatellite observations for hydrological and climate studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnet B, Vodacek A (2015) Tracking land use/land cover dynamics in cloud prone areas using moderate resolution satellite data: a case study in Central Africa. Remote Sens 7:6683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O, Ljubenkov I, Roje-Bonacci T (2006) Karst flash floods: an example from the Dinaric karst (Croatia). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby JW, Cook KH, Vizy EK, Smith TG, Bekalo M (2014) Identifying hot spots of security vulnerability associated with climate change in Africa. Clim Change 124:717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Kokkalidou A, Makropoulos CK (2006) Supporting the siting of new urban developments for integrated urban water resource management. In: Integrated urban water resources management. Springer, pp 19–34

  • Chau VN, Holland J, Cassells S, Tuohy M (2013) Using GIS to map impacts upon agriculture from extreme floods in Vietnam. Appl Geogr 41:65–74. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sherbinin A (2014) Climate change hotspots mapping: what have we learned? Clim Change 123:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembélé M, Zwart SJ (2016) Evaluation and comparison of satellite-based rainfall products in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Int J Remote Sens 37:3995–4014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demek J (1972) Manual of detailed geomorphological mapping. Academia, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng Z, Zhang X, Li D, Pan G (2015) Simulation of land use/land cover change and its effects on the hydrological characteristics of the upper reaches of the Hanjiang Basin. Environ Earth Sci 73:1119–1132. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3465-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont H, Van Damme K, Russell JM (2009) Rwenzori mountains (mountains of the moon): headwaters of the white Nile. In: The Nile. Springer, pp 243–261

  • EIMCO (2007) Environmental impact statement for the proposed waste composting plant and landfill for Kasese Town council. Enviro-impact and management consults (EIMCO), Kasese Town council, Kasese, Uganda

  • Elkhrachy I (2015) Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18:261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2013) Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics Nature. Clim Change 3:811–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M, Doherty R, Ngara T, New M, Lister D (2001) African climate change: 1900–2100. Clim Res 17:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFRC (2013) Uganda: Kasese floods. The international federation of red cross and red crescent (IFRC), Kampala, Uganda

  • Islam M, Sado K (2000) Flood hazard assessment for the construction of flood hazard map and land development priority map using NOAA/AVHRR data and GIS–a case study in Bangladesh. Hydrol Sci J des Sci Hydrol 45:337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs L et al (2016) Reconstruction of a flash flood event through a multi-hazard approach: focus on the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Nat Hazards 84:851–876. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2458-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7:186–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ 538:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A (2012) An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 67:251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinov S, Mitrovic S (1994) Effect of forest cover on the stream flow from small watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 49:382–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP (2011) Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrol Sci J J des Sci Hydrol 56:212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2014) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins K, Kleckner R (1996) Land cover mapping: an overview and history of the concepts. Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning, pp 57–65

  • Masoudian M (2009) The topographical impact on effectiveness of flood protection measures Bündnisse zur, vol 18. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri A (1996) Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. IAHS Publ Ser Proc Rep Int As Hydrol Sci 235:559–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosetto M, Jobbágy E, Brizuela A, Jackson R (2012) The hydrologic consequences of land cover change in central Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 154:2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyarko BK (2002) Application of a rational model in GIS for flood risk assessment in Accra, Ghana. J Spat Hydrol 2(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ologunorisa T, Abawua M (2005) Flood risk assessment: a review. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 9:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouma YO, Tateishi R (2014) Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: methodological overview and case study assessment. Water 6:1515–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH, Sorooshian S (1994) A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 48:119–126. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renno DC, Twinamasiko J, Mugisa CP (2012) Kasese district poverty profiling and mapping 2011–2012. Belgian Technical Cooperation, Kasese

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer VB (2002) USGS, the national flood frequency program, version 3: a computer program for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites. USGS

  • Schipper L, Pelling M (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 30:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt TG, Thomas M, Ettrich N (2004) Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. J Hydrol 299:300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorooshian S, Hsu K-L, Gao X, Gupta HV, Imam B, Braithwaite D (2000) Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite–based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:2035–2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol 512:332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ticehurst C, Dutta D, Karim F, Petheram C, Guerschman JP (2015) Improving the accuracy of daily MODIS OWL flood inundation mapping using hydrodynamic modelling. Nat Hazards 78:803–820. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1743-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingsanchali T, Karim F (2010) Flood-hazard assessment and risk-based zoning of a tropical flood plain: case study of the Yom River, Thailand. Hydrol Sci J 55:145–161. doi:10.1080/02626660903545987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong X et al (2016) Estimating water volume variations in Lake Victoria over the past 22 years using multi-mission altimetry and remotely sensed images. Remote Sens Environ 187:400–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBOS (2016) The national population and housing census 2014, Main report edn. Uganda bureau of statistics, Kampala, Uganda

  • USACE-HEC (2013) Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension, HEC-GeoHMS v10.1 user’s manual. U.S. army corps of engineers, hydrologic engineering center, Davis, USA

  • USDA (1972) SCS national engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. USDA soil conservation service

  • Wahlstrom M, Guha-Sapir D (2015) The human cost of weather-related disasters 1995–2015. UNISDR, CRED, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Winsemius HC et al. (2016) Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Clim Change 6:381–385. doi:10.1038/nclimate2893. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n4/abs/nclimate2893.html#supplementary-information

  • Xu H (2006) Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens 27:3025–3033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin G, Akyurek Z (2004) Analysing flood vulnerable areas with multicriteria evaluation. In: 20th ISPRS congress, 2004, pp 1–6

  • Yan B, Fang NF, Zhang PC, Shi ZH (2013) Impacts of land use change on watershed streamflow and sediment yield: an assessment using hydrologic modelling and partial least squares regression. J Hydrol 484:26–37. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Meng X, Zhang X (2011) SRTM DEM and its application advances. Int J Remote Sens 32:3875–3896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Malone E, Brenkert A, Schlesigner M, Meij H, Lee D (2006) Geographic distributions of vulnerability to climate change. Integr Assess J 6(3):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Rosewell C (1996) Technical notes: a robust estimator of the R-factor for the universal soil loss equation. Trans of the ASAE 39:559–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24:583–594. doi:10.1080/01431160304987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Guindon B (2009) Multi-resolution integration of land cover for sub-pixel estimation of urban impervious surface and forest cover. Int J Digit Earth 2:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Chen X (2005) Use of normalized difference bareness index in quickly mapping bare areas from TM/ETM+. In: Proceedings. 2005 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2005. IGARSS’05, 2005. IEEE, pp 1666–1668

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Study, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Siping Rd 1239, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Martin Kabenge, Joshua Elaru, Hongtao Wang & Fengting Li

Authors
  1. Martin Kabenge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua Elaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongtao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fengting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengting Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabenge, M., Elaru, J., Wang, H. et al. Characterizing flood hazard risk in data-scarce areas, using a remote sensing and GIS-based flood hazard index. Nat Hazards 89, 1369–1387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3024-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3024-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation