Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteresis Properties of EMG Activity of the Shoulder Belt and Shoulder Muscles at the Development of Isometric Efforts by the Human Arm

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2015

In experiments on rats, we studied the effects of experimental hyperthyroidism (subcutaneous injections of L-thyroxine, 50 μg/kg·day during 7 days) and hypercorticoidism (daily i.p. injections of hydrocortisone, 3 mg/kg·day during 30 days) on parameters of the М responses of the m. tibialis anterior after stimulation of the n. peroneus by single stimuli and their series with the instant frequency increasing linearly from 4 to 74 sec−1. In hypercorticoidism, the latency of single М responses was, on average, 30% longer, while the amplitude was 29% lower than those in the control. Multicomponent М potentials were observed in this group more frequently (in 37.5% of the cases); the duration of these responses demonstrated no significant changes. Hyperthyroidism caused shortening of the latency of the М responses (by 15%) and a decrease in their duration (by 25%). The mean amplitude of the responses exceeded the control by 70%; significant modifications of their shape were not observed. Experimental hyperthyroidism and hypercorticoidism were accompanied by a more expressed decrease, as compared with the control, in the amplitude with increase in the frequency of stimulation of the nerve and decreased stability of generation of the responses. The frequency level at which the inverse dependence between the М response amplitude and stimulation frequency began to be clearly pronounced decreased in animals with the modified hormonal status. Probable reasons for peculiarities of the frequency dependence of the parameters of the М responses in hyperthyroidism and hypercorticoidism are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle hysteresis and movement control: a theoretical study,” Neuroscience, 83, No. 1, 303–320 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Gorkovenko, S. Sawczyn, N. V. Bulgakova, et al., “Muscle agonist–antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model,” Exp. Brain Res., 222, No. 4, 399-414 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Kostyukov and V. L. Cherkassky, “Movementdependent after-effects in the firing of the spindle endings from the de-efferented muscles of the cat hindlimb,” Neuroscience, 46, No. 4, 989-999 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Kostyukov and V. L. Cherkassky, “Interaction of the movement-dependent, extrafusal and fusimotor aftereffects in the firing of the primary spindle endings,” Neuroscience, 76, No. 4, 1257-1266 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A. G. Feldman and M. F. Levin, “The equilibrium-point hypothesis – past, present and future,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 629, 699-726 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Tal’nov and A. Kostyukov, “Hysteresis aftereffects in human single-joint voluntary movements,” Neurophysiology, 26, No. 2, 65-71 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. N. Tal’nov, V. L. Cherkassky, and A. I. Kostyukov, “Movement-related and steady-state electromyographic activity of human elbow flexors in slow transition movements between two equilibrium states,” Neuroscience, 79, No. 3, 923-933 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J. C. Politti, C. J. Felice, and M. E. Valentinuzzi, “Arm EMG during abduction and adduction: hysteresis cycle,” Med. Eng. Phys. , 25, No. 4, 317-320 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A. P. Mel’nichouk, N. V. Bulgakova, A. N. Tal’nov, et al., “Movement-dependent positioning errors in human elbow joint movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 176, No. 2, 237-247 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. I. V. Vereshchaka, A. V. Gorkovenko, V. I. Khorevin, et al., “Peculiarities of activation of the shoulder belt and shoulder muscles in the formation of “two-joint” isometric efforts of different directions by the forelimb,” Neurophysiology, 42, No. 4, 316-328 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. V. Vereshchaka, “Activation of the shoulder belt and shoulder muscles of humans at different rates of the development of “two-joint” isometric efforts by the forelimb,” Neurophysiology, 42, No. 6, 500-509 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. V. Vereshchaka and A. V. Gorkovenko, “Central activation of the upper limb muscles at the development of an isometric effort by the forelimb: Dependence on the position of the point of force application within the operational space,” Neurophysiology, 43, No. 3, 281-283 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. V. Vereshchaka and A. V. Gorkovenko, “Superposition of motor commands in the course of formation of “twojoint” static efforts by the human upper limb,” Fiziol. Zh., 58, No.1, 41-50 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Flash, Y. Meirovitch, and A. Barliya, “Models of human movement: Trajectory planning and inverse kinematics studies,” Robot. Auton. Syst., 61, No. 4, 330-339 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. M. van Bolhuis and C. C. Gielen, “A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions,” Biol. Cybern., 81, No. 3, 249-261 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Zatsiorsky and M. L. Latash, “Multi-finger prehension: an overview,” J. Mot. Behav., 40, No. 5, 446-476 (2008).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J. J. Kutch, A. D. Kuo, A. M. Bloch, et al., “Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation,” J. Neurophysiol., 100, No. 5, 2455-2471 (2008).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J. J. Kutch, A. D. Kuo, and W. Z. Rymer, “Extraction of individual muscle mechanical action from endpoint force,” J. Neurophysiol., 103, No. 6, 3535-3546 (2010).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A. D. Kuo, “A mechanical analysis of force distribution between redundant, multiple degree-of-freedom actuators in the human: Implications for the central nervous system,” Human Mov. Sci., 13, No. 5, 635-663 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. M. Bolhuis, C. C. Gielen, and G. J. van Ingen Schenau, “Activation patterns of mono- and bi-articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans,” J. Physiol., 508, No. 1, 313-324 (1998).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. C. J. Hasson, G. E. Caldwell, and R. E. A. van Emmerik, “Changes in muscle and joint coordination in learning to direct forces,” Human Mov. Sci., 27, No. 4, 590-609 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. M. van Bolhuis, W. P. Medendorp, and C. C. Gielen, “Motor unit firing behavior in human arm flexor muscles during sinusoidal isometric contractions and movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 117, No. 1, 120-130 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Pasquet, A. Carpentier, and J. Duchateau, “Specific modulation of motor unit discharge for a similar change in fascicle length during shortening and lengthening contractions in humans,” J. Physiol., 577, No. 2, 753-765 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Duchateau and R. M. Enoka, “Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints,” J. Physiol., 586, No. 24, 5853-5864 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Kallio, K. Søgaard, J. Avela, et al., “Motor unit firing behavior of soleus muscle in isometric and dynamic contractions,” PLoS One, 8, No. 2, e53425 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Sobolev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sobolev, V.I., Trush, V.V., Litvyak, K.A. et al. Hysteresis Properties of EMG Activity of the Shoulder Belt and Shoulder Muscles at the Development of Isometric Efforts by the Human Arm. Neurophysiology 47, 61–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-015-9498-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-015-9498-x

Keywords

Navigation