We studied the dynamics of EMG activity of muscles of the human upper limb under conditions of changes in the direction of a vector of the isometric effort created by the hand. Averaged EMG activities of seven muscles of the shoulder and shoulder girdle at nine combinations of the angles in the shoulder and elbow joints were evaluated. Mean values of the angles of the maximum activity (AMAs) of the muscle during slow counterclockwise and clockwise rotations of the above-mentioned vector were compared. A significant dependence of the AMA in a considerable part of the muscles on the direction of the target trajectory hodograph by the vector of the generated effort was observed; this dependence is, most likely, due to the manifestations of hysteresis in the activity of the examined muscles. In the case where the analysis was performed in more detail, AMA values for the mm. triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and deltoideus pars scapularis were significantly greater at clockwise rotation, while those for the m. brachioradialis demonstrated an opposite trend.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. I. Kostyukov and V. L. Cherkassky, “Interaction of the movement-dependent, extrafusal and fusimotor aftereffects in the firing of the primary spindle endings,” Neuroscience, 76, No. 4, 1257-1266 (1997).
A. Tal’nov and A. Kostyukov, “Hysteresis aftereffects in human single-joint voluntary movements,” Neurophysiology, 26, No. 2, 65-71 (1994).
A. N. Tal’nov, V. L. Cherkassky, and A. I. Kostyukov, “Movement-related and steady-state electromyographic activity of human elbow flexors in slow transition movements between two equilibrium states,” Neuroscience, 79, No. 3, 923-933 (1997).
J. C. Politti, C. J. Felice, and M. E. Valentinuzzi, “Arm EMG during abduction and adduction: hysteresis cycle,” Med. Eng. Phys., 25, No. 4, 317-320 (2003).
O. V. Lehedza, A. V. Gorkovenko, I. V. Vereschaka, et al., “Comparative analysis of electromyographic muscle activity of the human hand during cyclic turns of isometric effort vector of wrist in opposite directions,” Int. J. Phys. Pathophys., 7, No. 2, 105-117 (2016).
O. V. Lehedza, “Manifestations of hysteresis in EMG activity of muscles of the human upper limb in generation of cyclic isometric efforts,” Neurophysiology, 49, No. 3, 226-231 (2017).
A. V. Gorkovenko, O. V. Legedza, I. V. Vereschaka, et al., “Hysteresis properties of EMG activity of the shoulder girdle and shoulder muscles at the development of isometric efforts by the human arm,” Neurophysiology, 47, No. 1, 61-70 (2015).
A. V. Gorkovenko, S. Sawczyn, N. V. Bulgakova, et al., “Muscle agonist-antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model,” Exp. Brain. Res., 222, No. 4, 399-414 (2012).
D. M. Gillard, S. Yakovenko, T. Cameron, et al., “Isometric muscle length-tension curves do not predict angle-torque curves of human wrist in continuous active movements,” J. Biomech., 33, No. 11, 1341–1348 (2000).
S. Walcott and S. X. Sun, “Hysteresis in cross-bridge models of muscle,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, No. 24, 4871–4881 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dornowski, M., Lehedza, O.V., Mishchenko, V.S. et al. Hysteresis in EMG Activity of Muscles of the Human Upper Limb at Rotations of the Isometric Effort Vector. Neurophysiology 49, 308–312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-017-9688-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-017-9688-9