Abstract
In goldfish fries, we examined the effect of the optomotor reaction (drive to swim toward moving images of vertical dark bars) on the behavioral motor asymmetry. Contralateral optokinetic stimulation of fishes (rotation of the bars against the direction preferred by fishes in their turnings) gradually smoothed and, later on, inverted the motor asymmetry, while the asymmetry underwent no modifications in the case of ipsilateral optokinetic stimulation (rotation of the bars in the direction similar to that preferred for turnings). Contralateral optokinetic stimulation also induced long-lasting inversion of the motor asymmetry of immobilized fishes deprived of the possibility to follow the movement of bar images. Ipsilateral optokinetic stimulation of fishes with the enucleation of the ipsilateral eye enhanced their motor asymmetry, while contralateral stimulation either did not modify the motor asymmetry of such individuals or inverted this feature. These data agree with the concept that, in fishes, one eye dominates and more actively provides tracking of the movement of bars, while another eye is a subdominant one. In general, we first found that the use of specific visual stimulation allows one to modify for a long time the behavioral motor asymmetry of the fishes, which, as is known, correlates with the morphofunctional asymmetry of Mauthner neurons (MNs). Visual information that activates MNs influences mostly the ventral dendrites of these neurons; thus, our findings allow us to believe that stimulations, which initiate the optomotor reaction, can serve as an adequate physiological model of natural visual stimulation of MNs (with projection of the respective influences on the ventral dendrites of the above cells). The use of such an experimental paradigm opens up new possibilities for studies of the role of these dendrites in the functions of MNs and of the plasticity of morphofunctional organization of these cells.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Korn and D. S. Faber, “The Mauthner cell half a century later: a neurobiological model for decision-making?” Neuron, 47, No. 1, 13–22 (2005).
S. J. Zottoli, “Correlation of the startle reflex and Mauthner cell auditory responses in unrestrained goldfish,” J. Exp. Biol., 66, No. 5, 243–254 (1977).
S. J. Zottoli and D. S. Faber, “Properties and distribution of anterior VIII-th nerve excitatory inputs to the goldfish Mauthner cell,” Brain Res., 174, No. 2, 319–323 (1979).
S. J. Zottoli, A. R. Hordes, and D. S. Faber, “Localization of optic tectal input to the ventral dendrite of the goldfish Mauthner cell,” Brain Res., 401, No. 1, 113–121 (1987).
S. A. Weiss, S. J. Zottoli, S. C. Do, et al., “Correlation of the C-start behaviors with neural activity recorded from the hindbrain in free-swimming goldfish (Carassius auratus),” J. Exp. Biol., 209, No. 23, 4788–4801 (2006).
Y. Nakajima, “Fine structure of the synaptic endings on the Mauthner cells of the goldfish,” J. Comp. Neurol., 156, No. 2, 375–402 (1974).
J. Diamond and J. Huxley, “The activation and distribution of GABA and L-glutamate receptors on goldfish Mauthner neurons: an analysis of dendritic remote inhibition,” J. Physiol., 194, No. 3, 669–723 (1968).
B. Jakoubek and J. E. Edstrom, “RNA changes in Mauthner axon and myelin sheath after increased functional activity,” J. Neurochem., 12, No. 4, 845–849 (1965).
G. Z. Mikhailova, A. V. Arytyunyan, I. M. Santalova, et al., “Asymmetry of motor behavior of the goldfish in a narrow channel,” Neurophysiology, 37, No. 1, 48–55 (2005).
I. M. Santalova and D. A. Moshkov, “Studies of the contribution of two different afferent inputs to fatigue of goldfish Mauthner neurons,” in: Ultrastructure and Plasticity of Neurons [in Russian], D. A. Moshkov (ed.), Sci. Center for Biol. Res., Acad. Sci. USSR, Pushchino (1990), pp. 91–100.
G. Z. Mikhailova, N. R. Tiras, V. D. Pavlik, et al., “Morphological parameters of Mauthner neurons of goldfish with modified asymmetry of motor behavior,” Neurophysiology, 38, No. 1, 15–26 (2006).
D. A. Moshkov, L. L. Pavlik, N. R. Tiras, et al., “Ultrastructural changes in the mixed synapses of Mauthner neurons related to long-term potentiation and natural modification of the motor function,” Neurophysiology, 35, No. 5, 361–370 (2003).
A. Bisazza and G. Vallortigara, “Rotational basis in mosquitofish (Gambusia hoolbrooki): the role of lateralization and sun-compass navigation,” Laterality, 1, No. 2, 161–175 (1996).
J. G. Canfield and G. J. Rose, “Hierarchical sensory guidance of Mauthner-mediated escape in goldfish (Carrasius auratus) and cichlids (Haplochromis burtoni),” Brain, Behav., Evolut., 48, No. 2, 137–156 (1996).
Th. Preuss and D. S. Faber, “Central cellular mechanisms underlying temperature-dependent changes in the goldfish startle-escape behavior,” J. Neurosci., 23, No. 13, 5617–5626 (2003).
A. Bisazza, M. Dadda, and C. Cantalupo, “Further evidence for mirror-reversed laterality in lines of fish selected for leftward or rightward turning when facing a predator model,” Behav. Brain Res., 156, No. 1, 165–171 (2005).
D. A. Moshkov, Adaptation and Ultrastructure of Neurons [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1985).
N. R. Tiras, G. Z. Mikhailova, and D. A. Moshkov, “Effects induced by an actin-polymerizing peptide in goldfish Mauthner neurons,” Neurophysiology, 38, Nos. 5/6, 327–337 (2006).
J. J. Anderson, “A neural model for visual activation of startle-behavior on fish,” J. Theor. Biol., 131, No. 2, 279–288 (1988).
A. Stefanelli, “The Mauthnerian apparatus in the Ichtyopsida: its nature and function and correlated problems of neurohistogenesis,” Q. Rev. Biol., 26, No. 1, 17–34 (1951).
D. A. Sakharov, “Mauthner giant neurons,” Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 52, No. 4, 112–124 (1961).
R. Hinde, Behavior of Animals. A Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology [in Russian], Mir, Moscow (1975).
J. R. Cronley-Dillon and W. R. A. Muntz, “The spectral sensitivity of the goldfish and the clawed toad tadpole under photopic conditions,” J. Exp. Biol., 42, No. 3, 481–493 (1965).
S. Anstis, P. Hutahajan, and P. Cavanagh, “Optomotor test for wavelength sensitivity in guppyfish (Poecilia reticulata),” Vis. Res., 38, No. 1, 45–53 (1998).
A. D. Springer, S. S. Easter, and B. W. Agranoff, “The role of the optic tectum in various visually mediated behaviors of goldfish,” Brain Res., 128, No. 3, 393–404 (1977).
T. Roeser and H. Baier, “Visuomotor behaviors in larval zebrafish after GFP-guided laser ablation of the optic tectum,” J. Neurosci., 23, No. 9, 3726–3735 (2003).
R. H. H. Kröger, B. Knoblauch, and H.-J. Wagner, “Rearing in different photic and spectral environments changes the optomotor response to chromatic stimuli in the cichlid fish Aequidens pulcher,” J. Exp. Biol., 206, No. 11, 1643–1648 (2003).
J. C. Beck, E. Gilland, D. W. Tank, and R. Baker, “Quantifying the ontogeny of optokinetic and vestibuloocular behaviors in zebrafish, medaka, and goldfish,” J. Neurophysiol., 92, No. 10, 3546–3561 (2004).
R. Lesley and R. Andrew, Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2002).
V. F. Fokin, “Evolution of the central/peripheral organization of the functional interhemisphere asymmetry,” in: Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry [in Russian], V. F. Fokin (ed.), Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow (2004), pp. 47–79.
G. Vallortigara, “Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through left and right animals’ perceptual worlds,” Brain Lang., 73, No. 2, 189–219 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 133–145, March–April, 2007.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shtanchayev, R.S., Mikhailova, G.Z., Dektyareva, N.Y. et al. Effects of optokinetic stimulation on motor asymmetry in the goldfish. Neurophysiology 39, 118–129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-007-0017-6
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-007-0017-6