Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival and growth of drought hardened Eucalyptus pilularis Sm. seedlings and vegetative cuttings

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forestry requires low mortality of transplanted seedlings. Mortality shortly after planting is often associated with inadequate hydration of transplants. Seedlings can be hardened to the drought conditions they may experience after transplanting by exposing them to controlled drought conditions in the nursery. Eucalyptus pilularis Sm. seedlings were drought hardened by providing nil (severe treatment) or half (mild treatment) the daily irrigation routinely received (control treatment) for up to two non-consecutive days per week during the last 4 weeks of growth in the nursery. Drought hardening reduced stem diameter, seedling leaf area, leaf area per root biomass and seedling quality measured by the Dickson quality index, but increased root:shoot ratio. Hardened seedlings had lower stomatal conductance and leaf water potential on the days they received less irrigation that the control treatment. Hardened seedlings had greater stomatal conductance and were less water stressed than seedlings experiencing drought for the first time indicating hardened seedlings had adjusted physiologically to drought. Survival after transplanting in the controlled drought environment in a glasshouse was enhanced by the hardening treatments. Non hardened seedlings that had had their upper leaves manually removed immediately prior to transplanting to reduce leaf area (top-clipped) had similar survival to hardened seedlings. Stomatal conductance and leaf water potential after transplanting were higher in hardened and top-clipped seedlings than unhardened control seedlings or vegetative cuttings. Survival in the field trial was over 95% for all treatments, possibly as rain fell within 4 days of planting and follow-up rain occurred in the subsequent weeks. Neither the hardened or top-clipped seedlings planted in the field trial had reduced growth, increased propensity to form double leaders or worse stem form than control seedlings when measured at age 3 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burdett AN (1990) Physiological processes in plantation establishment and development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can J For Res 20:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Meteorology (2009) Climate statistics for Australian locations. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/

  • Campbell KA, Hawkins CDB (2004) Effect of seed source and nursery culture on paper birch (Betula papyrifera) uprooting resistance and field performance. For Ecol Manag 196:425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry AK, Hafeez SM, Ghauri MJ (1995) Optimum watering level for Eucalyptus camaldulensis plants in the nursery stage. Pak J For 42:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Close DC, Davidson NJ (2002) Revegetation to combat tree decline in the Midlands and Derwent valley lowlands of Tasmania: practices for improved plant establishment. Ecol Manag Restor 4:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Close DC, Beadle CL, Brown PH (2005) The physiological basis of containerised tree seedling ‘transplant shock’: a review. Aust For 68:112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF (1960) Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. For Chron 36:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco JA, Banon S, Fernandez JA, Leskovar DI (2001) Effect of nursery regimes and establishment irrigation on root development of Lotus creticus seedlings following transplanting. J Hort Sci Biotech 76:174–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossnickle SC (2005) Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For 30:273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnaschelli AB, Lemcoff JH, Prystupa P, Basci S (2003) Responses to drought preconditioning in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Provenances. Trees 17:501–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate: a qualitative approach to environmental plant physiology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Maillard P, Garriou D, Deleens E, Gross P, Guehl JM (2004) The effects of lifting on mobilisation and new assimilation of C and N during regrowth of transplanted Corsican pine seedlings. A dual 13C and 15N labelling approach. Ann For Sci 61:795–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson A (1996) Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New For 13:223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath DA, Duryea ML (1994) Initial moisture stress, budbreak and two-year field performance of three morphological grades of slash pine seedlings. New For 8:335–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngugi MR, Hunt MA, Doley D, Ryan P, Dart P (2003) Dry matter production and allocation in Eucalyptus cloeziana and Eucalyptus argophloia seedlings in response to soil water deficits. New For 26:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojemakinde OA, Onwueme IC (1980) Heat and drought hardening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants as an aid to field survival. Q J Int Agric 19:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis GG, Hall AE (1986) Resistencia a desidratacao de Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. com restricao do sistema radicular. Arvore 10:168–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhizopoulou S, Davies WJ (1993) Leaf and growth dynamics in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings grown in dry soil. Trees 8:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rook DA (1973) Conditioning Radiata Pine seedlings to transplanting, by restricted watering. NZ J For Sci 3:54–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Royo A, Gil L, Pardos JA (2001) Effect of water stress conditioning on morphology, physiology and field performance of Pinus halepensis Mill. seedlings. New For 21:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Sanchez MC, Domingo R, Torrecillas A, Perez-Pastor A (1998) Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plants. Plant Sci 156:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse J, Sands R (1996) Comparative responses of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus to water stress. Tree Physiol 16:287–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searson MJ, Thomas DS, Montagu KD, Conroy JP (2004) Leaf water use efficiency differs between Eucalyptus seedlings from contrasting rainfall environments. Funct Plant Biol 31:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Gonclaves JLM, Goncalves AN (2001) Relationships between nursery practices and field performance for Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. New For 22:19–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DS (2008) Hydrogel applied to the root plug of subtropical eucalypt seedlings halves transplant death following planting. For Ecol Manag 255:1305–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DS, Eamus D (1999) The influence of predawn leaf water potential on stomatal responses to atmospheric water content at constant Ci and on stem hydraulic conductance and foliar ABA concentrations. J Exp Bot 50:243–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DS, Turner DW (1998) Leaf gas exchange of droughted and irrigated banana cv Williams (Musa spp.) growing in hot, arid conditions. J Hort Sci Biotech 73:419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC, Begg JE (1981) Plant-water relations and adaption to stress. Plant Soil 58:97–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar-Salvador P, Planelles R, Oliet J, Penuelas-Rubira JL, Jacobs DF, Gonzales M (2004) Drought tolerance and transplanting performance of holm oak (Quercus ilex) seedlings after drought hardening in the nursery. Tree Physiol 24:1147–1155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This experiment was supported by the staff of Forests NSW Grafton Forest Nursery and Tree Improvement Nursery, and in particular appreciation is extended to Bevan Pugh, Kath French and Chris Moran for supplying seedlings and cutting, Geoff Heagney, Piers Harper and Darrel Johnstone for assistance in establishing the field and glasshouse experiments, and Michael Henson for statistical advice. Several reviewers provided insightful comments and their advice is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, D.S. Survival and growth of drought hardened Eucalyptus pilularis Sm. seedlings and vegetative cuttings. New Forests 38, 245–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9144-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9144-9

Keywords

Navigation