Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multi level image steganography methodology based on adaptive PMS and block based pixel swapping

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practice of information exchange through global media like internet extensively entails a security concern. This paper consists of a proposed approach that braces the security concern in the realm of image steganography. The adaptive technique of the Power Modulus Scrambling (PMS) has been preliminarily used so as to disturb the normal pixel orientation of the original carrier. A second layer of encryption is enforced with the implementation of the Block Based Pixel Swapping technique. These steps ensure a two tier secured shield. Next, the embedding procedure is facilitated depending on a comparative key based permutation combination methodology. This approach caters the need of security during communication. The proposed approach is evaluated with respect to substantial performance metrics. The commendable results obtained shows that the foothold of imperceptibility is well maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdallah EE, Ben Hamza A, Bhattacharya P (2010) Video watermarking using wavelet transform and tensor algebra. SIViP 4:233–245

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad T, Abdullah M (2009) A novel steganographic method for gray-level images. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 3:574–579

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almohammad A, Ghinea G (2010) Stego-image quality and the reliability of PSNR. In: 2nd International Conference on Image Processing Theory Tools and Applications (IPTA), IEEE, pp 215–220

  4. Alsmirat MA, Al-Alem F, Al-Ayyoub M et al (2018) Impact of digital fingerprint image quality on the fingerprint recognition accuracy. Multimed Tools Appl:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5537-5

  5. Atawneh S, Almomani A, Bazar HA, Sumari P, Gupta BB (2016) Secure and imperceptible digital image steganographic algorithm based on diamond encoding in DWT domain. Multimed Tools Appl 76:18451–18472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee I, Indu P, Singh A et al (2015) Robust watermarking using four bit per pixel technique. Int J Electron Secur Digit Forensics 7:345–357

  7. Bhattacharya S, Sanyal G (2010) A data hiding model with high security features combining finite state machines and PMM method. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering 4:1243–1250

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandramouli R, Kharrazi M, Memon N (2003) Image steganography and steganalysis concepts and practice. In: Kalker T, Cox IJ, Ro YM (eds) International workshop on digital watermarking (IWDW). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 35–49

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chang C et al (2002) A steganographic method based upon JPEG and quantization table modification. Inf Sci 141:123–138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Das S, Muhammad K, Bakshi S et al (2018) Lip biometric template security framework using spatial steganography. Pattern Recogn Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.06.026

  11. Dukkipati A (2012) On maximum entropy and minimum KL-divergence optimization by Gröbner basis methods. Appl Math Comput 218:11674–11687

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsheh E, Ben Hamza A (2011) Secret sharing approaches for 3D object encryption. Expert Syst Appl 38:13906–13911

  13. Ferzli R, Girija L, Ali W (2010) Efficient implementation of kurtosis based no reference image sharpness metric. In: Astola J, Egiazarian KO (eds) Proceedings in Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems VIII, Volume 7532, SPIE, San Jose, California

  14. Gurav M, Mukesh Tiwari P, Singh P (2015) High secured image by LSB steganography technique using matlab. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 3:1836–1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang P, Chang K, Chang C et al (2008) A novel image steganography method using tri-way pixel value differencing. J Multimed 3:37–44

  16. Joshi R, Gagnani L, Pandey S (2013) Image steganography with LSB. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol 2:228–229

  17. Lan T, Mansour M, Tewfik A (2000) Robust high capacity Data embedding. In: International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Vancouver, BC, Canada

  18. Lundin R, Lindskog S (2012) An investigation of entropy of selectively encrypted bitmap images. In: Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN), San Carlos, Brazil, pp 238–243

  19. Luo W, Huang F, Huang J (2010) Edge adaptive image steganography based on LSB matching revisited. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo X et al (2012) On F5 steganography in images. Comput J 55

  21. Maheswari SU, Hemanth DJ (2015) Performance enhanced image steganography systems using transforms and optimization techniques. Multimed Tools Appl 76:415–436

  22. Mukherjee S, Sanyal G (2016) A novel image steganography methodology based on adaptive PMS technique. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics (ICACNI 2016). Progress in Intelligent Computing Techniques: Theory, Practice, and Applications. Springer, Singapore, pp 157–164

  23. Mukherjee S, Sanyal G (2017) Enhanced position power first mapping (PPFM) based image steganography. Int J Comput Appl 39:59–68

  24. Mukherjee S, Sanyal G (2018) A chaos based image steganographic system. Multimed Tools Appl 77:27851–27876

  25. Mukherjee S, Ash S, Sanyal G (2015) A novel image steganographic methodology by power modulus scrambling with logistic mapping. In: TENCON, IEEE Region 10 Conference, Macao, China

  26. Nguyen S, Chang CC, Shih TH (2018) Effective reversible image steganography based on rhombus prediction and local complexity. Multimed Tools Appl 77:26449–26467

  27. Potdar V, Chang E (2004) Gray level modification steganography for secret communication. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Berlin, Germany, p 355–368

  28. Safarpour M, Charmi M (2016) Capacity enlargement of the PVD steganography method using the GLM technique. CoRR, abs/1601.00299

  29. Sanchetti A (2012) Pixel value differencing image steganography using secret key. Int J Innov Technol Exploring Eng 2:2278–3075

  30. Sheisi H, Mesgarian J, Rahmani M (2012) Steganography: Dct coefficient replacement method and compare with JSteg algorithm. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering 4:458–462

  31. Shojanazeri H, Adnan WAW, Ahmad SMS et al (2015) Authentication of images using Zernike moment watermarking. Multimed Tools Appl 76:577–606

  32. Singh K (2014) A survey on image steganography techniques. Int J Comput Appl 97:10–20

  33. Su Q, Wang G, Zhang X et al (2015) An improved color image watermarking algorithm based on QR decomposition. Multimed Tools Appl 76:707–729

  34. Wang D, Chang CC, Liu Y et al (2015) Digital image scrambling algorithm based on chaotic sequence and decomposition and recombination of pixel values. International Journal of Network Security 17:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang C, Weng C, Wang S et al (2008) Adaptive data hiding in edge areas of images with spatial LSB domain systems. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3:488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu C, Li J, Li X, Ren X, Gupta BB (2017) Four-image encryption scheme based on quaternion Fresnel transform, chaos and computer generated hologram. Multimed Tools Appl 77:4585–4608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science and Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India

    Srilekha Mukherjee & Goutam Sanyal

Authors
  1. Srilekha Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Goutam Sanyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srilekha Mukherjee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, S., Sanyal, G. A multi level image steganography methodology based on adaptive PMS and block based pixel swapping. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 17607–17622 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7127-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7127-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation