Abstract
The authors propose a flow motive behind flow experience. It is defined as the intrinsic component of the achievement motive (i.e., need to seek and master difficulty), assessed with an operant motive test (OMT), and investigated with a multimethod approach. The achievement flow motive was stable over 2 years (Study 1) and positively correlated with the following variables: self-determination (Study 2), work-efficiency according to multisource feedbacks (Study 3), and flow experience during an outdoor assessment center (Study 4). In addition, the achievement flow motive was associated with the simultaneous presence of two sets of overt behaviors: Seeing difficulty (planning, analytical problem solving, and task focus) and mastering difficulty (high commitment, spreading optimism, and staying power). The direct relationship between achievement flow motive and flow experience was mediated by this behavioral pattern (Study 4). The achievement flow motive offers researchers a way to operationalize Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of autotelic personality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Csikszentmihalyi used the label challenge instead of demands (i.e., task difficulty). This already implies a regulatory process within persons because demands can be perceived as a challenge or a threat depending on their match with skills. Thus, it would be more precise to talk about a demand-skill balance
The fourth question is often not considered for coding the OMT because it elicits happy endings out of the blue. Only if responses are coherently connected to and an integral part of the whole story, they can be used to define the implementation strategy.
A comprehensive scoring manual for the OMT is available in German and in English from the authors
Consistent with previous self-infiltration findings, an ANCOVA for items with a low level of attractiveness (with norm-split AOF scores, median-split threat scores, and source as independent variables) yielded a significant AOF × Threats × Source interaction, F(1, 107) = 4.31, p < .05: State-oriented participants had an increased tendency towards false self-ascription (FSA) of unattractive assignments when threats were high (FSAassigned_unattr = 20.37 vs. FSAremaining_unattr = 14.30; FSADiff_unattr = 6.07) compared to low (FSAassigned_unattr = 12.43 vs. FSAremaining_unattr = 15.30; FSADiff_unattr = −2.87). In contrast, action-oriented participants had a reduced tendency towards false self-ascription of unattractive assignments when threats were high (FSAassigned_unattr = 16.77 vs. FSAremaining_unattr = 19.35, FSADiff_unattr = −2.58) compared to low (FSAassigned_unattr = 22.89 vs. FSAremaining_unattr = 17.20, FSADiff_unattr = 5.69). Nevertheless, achievement flow motive was negatively correlated with self-infiltration when controlling for these effects.
We believe that negative affect does not play a role in flow experience for individuals with an achievement flow motive. However, the absence of negative affect may be an additional prerequisite for individuals high in fear of failure. They experience flow only under very relaxed conditions, for example, when tasks are so easy that success is guaranteed or when tasks are so difficult that a failure cannot be attributed to inability (Schüler 2007).
References
Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154. doi:10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89.
Baldwin, C. A. (2001). Achievement goals and exam performance: An exploration of the role of study strategies and anticipatory test anxiety. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 2-A.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.781.
Baumann, N., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Implicit motives: A look from personality systems interaction theory. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 375–403). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2002). Intuition, affect, and personality: Unconscious coherence judgments and self-regulation of negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1213–1223. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1213.
Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Self-infiltration: Confusing assigned tasks as self-selected in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 487–497. doi:10.1177/0146167202250916.
Baumann, N., & Scheffer, D. (2009). Seeing and mastering difficulty: The role of affective change in achievement flow. Cognition and Emotion. First published on: November 10, 2009 (iFirst). doi:10.1080/02699930903319911.
Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2003). Die Messung impliziter Motive in Deutschland, Costa Rica und Kamerun [Measurement of implicit motives in Germany, Costa Rica, and Cameroon]. Research report to the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975, 2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1975).
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 529–536.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton, M., Lombardo, M. M., McCauley, C. D., Moxley, R., & Wachholz, J. (1996). Benchmarks: A manual and trainer’s guide. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494-1994.tb00797.x.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (1999). Multi-source feedback systems: A research perspective. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 149–193). NewYork/London: Wiley.
Fortier, M., & Kowal, J. (2007). The flow state and physical activity behavior change as motivational outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 113–126, 322–328). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 287–312). New York: Guilford Press.
Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed. ed.). Cambridge: University Press.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562.
Haworth, J. T., Jarman, M., & Lee, S. (1997). Positive psychological states in the daily life of a sample of working women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 345–370. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00636.x.
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Heckhausen, H., & Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead ends and short cuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 134–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heckhausen, J., & Tomasik, M. J. (2002). Get an apprenticeship before school is out: How German adolescents adjust vocational aspirations when getting close to a developmental deadline. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 199–219. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1864.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed. ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). Relationships between quality of experience and participation in diverse performance settings. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56(Supplement), 193.
Jackson, S. A., Martin, A. J., & Eklund, R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 561–587.
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67.
Kazén, M., Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Self-infiltration vs. self-compatibility checking in dealing with unattractive tasks: The moderating influence of state vs. action orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 157–197. doi:10.1023/A:1025043530799.
Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Intention memory and achievement motivation: Volitional facilitation and inhibition as a function of affective contents of need-related stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 426–448. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.426.
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 315–327. doi:10.1177/0146167203256967.
Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209. doi:10.1177/0146167207310026.
Keller, J., & Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Personality, 22, 589–607. doi:10.1002/per.692.
Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1025–1036. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025.
Koole, S. L., & Coenen, L. H. M. (2007). Implicit self and affect regulation: Effects of action orientation and subliminal self priming in an affective priming task. Self and Identity, 6, 118–136. doi:10.1080/15298860601118835.
Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974–990. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.974.
Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the action-contol-scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47–59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and volition: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 111–169). New York: Academic Press.
Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Interactions of mental systems]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components checklist. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Life span perspectives on motivation and control (pp. 15–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1994). Self-discrimination and memory: State orientation and false self-ascription of assigned activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1103–1115. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1103.
Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382–399. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.382.
Kuhl, J., & Koole, S. L. (2004). Workings of the will: A functional approach. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 411–430). New York: Guilford Press.
Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (1999). Der operante Multi-Motiv-Test (OMT): Manual [Scoring Manual for the Operant Multi-Motive Test (OMT)]. Osnabrück, Germany: University of Osnabrück.
Kuhl, J., Scheffer, D., & Eichstaedt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Ein neuer Ansatz zur Messung impliziter Motive [The operant motive test (OMT): A new approach to the assessment of implicit motives]. In F. Rheinberg & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Diagnostic of motivation and self-concept] (pp. 129–149). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Lawler, E. E. (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369–381. doi:10.1037/h0025095.
Lombardo, M. M., & McCauley, C. D. (1995). Benchmarks®: Developmental reference points—a manual and trainer’s guide. Greensboro, NC: Center for creative Leadership.
Lundy, A. (1985). The reliability of the thematic apperception test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 141–145. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4902_6.
Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Derryberry, D. (1998). Anxiety and the motivational basis of working memory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 577–594.
McClelland, D. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 10–41). Beverly Hills: Sage.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.
McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381–395. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.381.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York: Oxford University Press.
Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal-setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736–753. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.736.
Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1987). Intuitive parenting: A dialectic counterpart to the infant’s integrative competence. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed. ed., pp. 669–720). New York: Wiley.
Rey, A. (1959). Manuel du test de copie et de reproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test Manual for the copy and reproduction of complex geometric figures from memory]. Paris: Les Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Rheinberg, F. (2004, July). Motivational competence and flow experience. In Paper presented at the 2nd European conference on positive psychology, Verbania, Italy.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens [The assessment of flow experience]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261–279). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Scheffer, D. (2005). Implizite Motive [Implicit motives]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Scheffer, D., & Kuhl, J. (2006). Erfolgreich motivieren. Mitarbeiterpersönlichkeit und Motivationstechniken [Successful motivation. Employee personality and techniques of motivation]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Scheffer, D., Kuhl, J., & Eichstaedt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Inhaltsklassen, Auswertung, psychometrische Kennwerte und Validierung. [The operant motive test (OMT): Contents, scoring, psychometric values, and validation]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Diagnostic of motivation and self-concept] (pp. 151–167). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam-performance and affect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 217–227. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.217.
Schüler, J., Job, V., Fröhlich, S. M., & Brandstätter, V. (2008). A high implicit affiliation motive does not always make you happy: A corresponding explicit motive and corresponding behavior are further needed. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 231–242. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9096-y.
Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, to thine own self be better. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209–269). New York: Academic Press.
Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J., & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality, 71, 835–869. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7105006.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. doi:10.1177/01461672962212007.
Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–155. doi:10.1037/h0047060.
Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.140.
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–755. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05022.
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., & Khoo, A. (2009). The psychometric properties of dispositional flow scale-2 in Internet gaming. Current Psychology, 28, 194–201. doi:10.1007/s12144-009-9058-x.
Watkins, E. D. (2004). Adaptive and maladaptive ruminative self-focus during emotional processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1037–1052. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.01.009.
Watkins, E., & Teasdale, J. D. (2004). Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 82, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.006.
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (version 4.2). University of Michigan, Department of Psychology.
Winter, D. G. (1996). Personality: Analysis and interpretation of lives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baumann, N., Scheffer, D. Seeking flow in the achievement domain: The achievement flow motive behind flow experience. Motiv Emot 35, 267–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9195-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9195-4