Abstract
This study examined the psychometric properties of the Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2; Jackson and Eklund in Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 24:133-150, 2002). One thousand five hundred and seventy-eight secondary school students (One thousand and seventy four males, four hundred and eleven females, ninety-three missing) from six schools in Singapore completed the questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the factorial structure of the DFS-2. A nine-first-order factor model was compared to a higher order model with a global flow factor. Support was found for the higher order factor. Multigroup analysis demonstrated invariance of the factor forms, factor loadings, factor variances, and factor covariances across age and sex. The DFS-2 subscales were found to have acceptable reliability estimates, and convergent validity. We conclude that DFS-2 is a valid instrument for assessing global flow experience in Internet gaming.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. (2006). EQS for Windows V6.1. Encino: Multivariate Software.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Choi, D., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2000). A cognitive and emotional strategy for computer game design. Journal of MIS Research, 10, 165–187.
Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: the flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 223–243.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Huang, M. (2006). Flow, enduring and situational involvement in the web environment: a tripartite second-order examination. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 383–411.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park: Sage.
Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. C. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scale manual. Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology.
Jackson, S. A., Kimiecik, J. C., Ford, S., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psycological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 358–378.
Marsh, H. W., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). Flow experience in sport: construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 343–371.
Wan, C., & Chiou, W. (2006). Psychological motives and online games addiction: a test of flow theory and humanistic needs theory for taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 317–324.
Wang, C. K. J., Khoo, A., Liu, W. C., & Divaharan, S. (2008). Passion and intrinsic motivation in digital gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, 39–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C.K.J., Liu, W.C. & Khoo, A. The Psychometric Properties of Dispositional Flow Scale-2 in Internet Gaming. Curr Psychol 28, 194–201 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9058-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9058-x