Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the fiber length dependence of its strength by using the weakest-link approach 1. A family of weakest-link distribution functions

  • Published:
Mechanics of Composite Materials Aims and scope

This paper presents a summary and further development of the ideas proposed in the previous papers of the authors, which were dedicated to investigating the fiber scale effect (strength-length relation). In the first part of the paper, some theoretical aspects of the problem are considered; in the second one, an application to the processing of test datasets is discussed. As distinct from our previous publications, two types of defects (“technological,” i.e., existing before loading, and load-dependent) and two types of influence of the number of defects on the fiber strength are considered; the probability of absence of defects is also taken into account. We consider a specimen as a sequence of n elements of the same length. It is supposed that there are defects in K of them, 0 ≤ K ≤ n. Two cases are considered: K is a random variable or a random process K (t). In the second case, the increase in K and the failure of a specimen is described as a Markov chain whose matrix of transition probabilities depends on the current value of the loading process, described as some (increasing to infinity) sequence {x1, x2, …, xt,…}. Three versions of relationships between the specimen strength and the number of defective elements are considered for both the cases. Thus, six probability structures are introduced, and different versions of distribution functions and the corresponding models are considered. The methods for estimating the model parameters, the results obtained in processing glass, flax, carbon fiber, and carbon bundle datasets, as well as a comparison of different models, are presented in the second part of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “A family of weakest link models for fiber strength distribution,” Composites, Pt. A, 38, 1227–1233 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “A new model family for the strength distribution of fibers in relation to their length,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 42, No. 2, 119–128 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “Analysis of fiber strength dependence on length using an extended weakest link distribution family,” Comp. Model. New Technol., 11, No. 1, 8–20 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “New weakest link distribution family,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. Statistical Methods for Biomechanical and Technical Systems, Limassol, Cyprus (2006), pp. 415–419.

  5. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “New widened weakest link distribution family,” in: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Appl. Stoch. Models Data Analysis (ASMDA-2007), May 29–June 1, Chania, Crete, Greece (2007).

  6. Yu. Paramonov and J. Andersons, “Modified weakest link family for tensile strength distribution,” in: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Mathem. Meth. Reliab. Methodol. Pract. (MMR 2007), July 1–4, Glasgow, UK (2007).

  7. F. T. S. Pierce, J. Text. Inst., 17, p. 355 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Weibull, “A statistical theory of the strength of materials,” Proc. Roy. Swed. Inst. Eng. Res., 151 (1939).

  9. H. E. Daniels, “The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A183, 405–435 (1945).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Zweben, “Tensile failure of composites,” AIAA J., 12, 2325–2331 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Zweben and B. Rosen, “A statistical theory of material strength with application to composite materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 18, No. 3, 189–206 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. F. Knoff, “Combined weakest link and random defect model for describing strength variability in fibres,” J. Mater. Sci., 28, 931–941 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. Gutans and V. P. Tamuzh, “To the scale effect of Weibull distribution of the strength of fibers,” Mekh. Kompoz. Mater., No. 6, 1107–1109 (1984).

  14. A. S. Watson and R. L. Smith, “An examination of statistical theories for fibrous materials in the light of experimental data,” J. Mater. Sci., 20, 3260–3270 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. L. Smith, “Weibull regression models for reliability data,” Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety, 34, 55–77 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. J. Padgett, S. D. Durham, and A. M. Mason, “Weibull analysis of the strength of carbon fibers using linear and power law models for the length effect,” J. Comp. Mater., 29, No. 14, 1873–1884 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. W. A. Curtin, “Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced composites: III. Beyond the traditional Weibull model for fiber strengths,” J. Comp. Mater., 34, No. 15, 1301–1332 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Andersons, R. Joffe, M. Hojo, and S. Ochiai, “Glass fibre strength distribution determined by common experimental methods,” Comp. Sci. Technol., 62, 131–145 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Andersons, E. Spārniņš, R. Joffe, and L. Wallstrom, “Strength distribution of elementary flax fibers,” Comp. Sci. Technol., 65, 693–702 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 685–696, September–October, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paramonov, Y., Andersons, J. Analysis of the fiber length dependence of its strength by using the weakest-link approach 1. A family of weakest-link distribution functions. Mech Compos Mater 44, 479–486 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-008-9036-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-008-9036-7

Keywords

Navigation