Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tailor-made scenario planning for local adaptation to climate change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a tailor-made scenario approach for climate change adaptation planning, which emphasises involvement of stakeholders in the development of socioeconomic scenarios and relates to the planning situation and interest of the planning entity. The method was developed and tested in case studies in three different sectors in Sweden (the health sector, the tourism sector and water resource management). The result of the case studies is that the tailor-made scenario approach facilitated the engagement of the local planning body in climate change adaptation and helped them to analyse consequences and possible solutions in a structured way. However, the scenarios that emerged mainly focused on socioeconomic drivers on which the planning body had a large impact or drivers that can be influenced through cooperation with other actors at the local or regional level. While this result underlines the need for local stakeholder involvement in scenario processes, it also indicates a local bias that could be remedied by a stronger representation of national and global perspectives in the scenario development process. Finally, we discuss how a “bottom-up” approach could be combined with a “consistency” approach, which points towards a possible way forward to a hybrid methodology that is compatible with the scenario framework currently being developed in connection to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The climate scenario was based on the climate modelling of the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI, 2011). Starting with a global climate model (ECHAM4/OPYC3), SMHI performs calculations with finer resolution over Europe using the regional climate model RCA3. The heat wave scenario was constructed as follows. If for example the minimum temperature in Paris on a particular date during the heat wave of 2003 was 3 standard deviations above the average in Paris, then we assumed a corresponding temperature anomaly over Umeå with a minimum temperature that was 3 standard deviations above the projected climate in Umeå in the year 2030. During the projected 2-week heat wave in Umeå, July 2030 (the hottest month in Umeå), the minimum temperature peaked at 20 °C (3 days) and the maximum temperature reached 33 °C (2 days). These figures should be compared to the 30-year averages for minimum and maximum temperature in July in Umeå, which are 11 and 19.5 °C respectively. Hence, the modelled heat wave represents a substantial alternation of normal conditions.

  2. The regional climate projection used in the study meant that the mean temperature during winter (summer) in 2030 will increase by 2.5 (1.5) °C. In the medium climate scenario for 2060 the mean temperature during winter (summer) will increase by 3.5 (2–2.5) °C, while the high climate change scenario imply increased winter (summer) temperature by 5.5 (3–3.5) °C.

References

  • Amara R (1981) The futures field: searching for definitions and boundaries. Futurist 15:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnell N, Kram T, Carter T et al (2011) A framework for a new generation of socioeconomic scenarios for climate change impact, adaptation, vulnerability and mitigation research. Working Paper, August 15. http://www.isp.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/Scenario_FrameworkPaper_15aug11_0.pdf Cited 4 sep 2012

  • Baard P, Carlsen H, Edvardsson Björnberg K et al (2012) Scenarios and sustainability: tools for alleviating the gap between municipal means and responsibilities in adaptation planning. Local Environment 17(6–7):641–662. doi:10.1080/13549839.2011.646969

  • Bartholomew K (2007) Land use-transportation scenario planning: promise and reality. Transportation 34:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu R, Samet JM (2002) Relation between elevated ambient temperature and mortality: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev 24:190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Hertin J, Jordan A (2002) Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as learning machines. Glob Environ Chang 12:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizikova L, Dickinson T, Pintér L (2009) Participatory scenario development for climatechange adaptation. In: Reid H (ed) Community-based adaptation to climate change (Participatory Learning and Action 60). IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg KH et al (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38:723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield R, Wright G, Burt G et al (2005) The Origins and Evolution of Scenario Techniques in Long Range Business Planning. Futures 37:795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch S, Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A, Flanders D (2010) Planning for climate change in a flood prone community: municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. J Flood Risk Manag 3:126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR, Jylhä K, Perrels A et al (2005) FINADAPT scenarios for the 21st century. Alternative futures for considering adaptation to climate change in Finland, FINADAPT Working Paper no. 2, Finnish Environment Institute Mimeographs 332, Helsinki. http://www.environment.fi/download.asp?contentid=44018&lan=en Cited 4 sep 2012

  • Chermack TJ (2004) Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 36:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery FE, Trist EL (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Hum Relat 18:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouillet A, Rey G, Laurent F et al (2006) Excess mortality related to the August 2003 heat wave in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidley JM, Fien J, Smith JA, Thomsen DC, Smith TF (2009) Participatory future methods: towards adaptability and resilience in climate-vulnerable communities. Environ Pol Govern 19:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M, Dreborg KH, Engström R et al (2011) Experience of the Development and use of scenarios for evaluating Swedish national environmental objectives. Futures 43:498–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes N, Tomei J, Ekins P (2009) Critical review of the Application of the UKCIP Socioeconomic Scenarios: Lessons Learnt and Future Directions. Department of Geography, King’s College London. http://ukcip-main.clustered.net/wordpress/wp-content/PDFs/UKCIP_SRES_review.pdf Cited 4 sep 2012

  • IPCC (2012) Summary for Policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF (eds) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques P (2006) Downscaling climate models and environmental policy: From global to regional politics. J Environ Plan Manag 49:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok K, Biggs R, Zurek M (2007) Methods for Developing Multiscale Participatory Scenarios: Insights from Southern Africa and Europe. Ecol Soc 12:8–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler E, O’Neill B, Hallegatte S et al (2010) Socioeconomic scenario development for climate change analysis. CIRED Working Paper. DT/WP No 2010-23, October 2010. http://www.centre-cired.fr/IMG/pdf/CIREDWP-201023.pdf Cited 4 sep 2012

  • Lorenzoni I, Jordan A, Hulme M et al (2000) A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part 1. Integrating socio-economic and climate change scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 10:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD et al (2007) Global Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbar KA et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović N, Alcamo J, Davis G et al (2000) Emission scenarios. Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill B, Pulver S, Van Deveer S et al (2008) Where next with global environmental scenarios? Environ Res Lett 3(4):045012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey T (2011) Wicked Problems—Social Messes: Decision Support Modelling with Morphological Analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rocklöv J, Forsberg B (2008) The effect of temperature on mortality in Stockholm 1998–2003—a study of lag structures and heat wave effects. Scand J Public Health 36:516–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell MDA, Metzger MJ (2010) Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:606–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schär C, Vidale PL, Luthi D et al (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heat waves. Nature 427:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk NJ, Lensink M (2007) Communicating uncertainty in the IPCC’s greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Clim Chang 82:292–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S et al (2009) Making local futures tangible—Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Chang 19:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMHI (2011) Sveriges klimat i framtiden. http://www.smhi.se/sgn0106/leveranser/sverigeanalysen/ Cited 4 sep 2012

  • Svenfelt Å, Engström R, Höjer M (2010) Use of explorative scenarios in environmental policy making—evaluation of policy instruments for management of land, water and the bulit environment. Future 42:1166–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability (2007) Sweden facing climate change—threats and opportunities [in Swedish], Final report from the Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability SOU 2007:60. Swedish Government Official Reports, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P et al (2007) Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government Offices for Science (2011) Blacket Review of High Impact Low Probability Risks. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UKCIP (2001) Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: a guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme. UK Climate Impacts Programme, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2002) Global Environment Outlook 3: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. UNEP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden K (2005) Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • van Drunen MA, van’t Klooster SA, Berkhout F (2011) Bounding the future: The use of scenarios in assessing climate change impacts. Futures 43:488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Lucas PL, Hilderink H (2007) Downscaling drivers of global environmental change: Enabling use of global SRES scenarios at the national and grid levels. Glob Environ Chang 17:114–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Smith SJ, Riahi K (2010) Downscaling socioeconomic and emissions scenarios for global environmental change research: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Riahi K, Moss R et al (2012) A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities. Glob Environ Chang 22:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Troni J, Biot Y et al (2009) A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning. Int J Climatol 29:1193–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1969) Discovery, Invention. Research—Through the Morphological Approach. The Macmillian Company, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants in the three case studies and especially the municipal civil servants that helped organise the studies. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency is acknowledged for financial support through the research programme CLIMATOOLS. We also give a special thanks to the anonymous reviewers for many useful suggestions for improvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Wikman-Svahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsen, H., Dreborg, K.H. & Wikman-Svahn, P. Tailor-made scenario planning for local adaptation to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 1239–1255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9419-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9419-x

Keywords

Navigation