Abstract
Cybernetics promoted machine-supported investigations of adaptive sensorimotor behaviours observed in biological systems. This methodological approach receives renewed attention in contemporary robotics, cognitive ethology, and the cognitive neurosciences. Its distinctive features concern machine experiments, and their role in testing behavioural models and explanations flowing from them. Cybernetic explanations of behavioural events, regularities, and capacities rely on multiply realizable mechanism schemata, and strike a sensible balance between causal and unifying constraints. The multiple realizability of cybernetic mechanism schemata paves the way to principled comparisons between biological systems and machines. Various methodological issues involved in the transition from mechanism schemata to their machine instantiations are addressed here, by reference to a simple sensorimotor coordination task. These concern the proper treatment of ceteris paribus clauses in experimental settings, the significance of running experiments with correct but incomplete machine instantiations of mechanism schemata, and the advantage of operating with real machines ??? as opposed to simulated ones ??? immersed in real environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. Aleksander, How to Build a Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson (2000).
D.J. Amit, Simulation in Neurobiology: Theory or Experiment?. Trends in Neurosciences 21 (1998) 231-237
C.G. Atkeson, J.G. Hale, F. Pollick, M. Riley, S. Kotosaka, S. Schaal, T. Shibata, G. Tevatia, A. Ude, S. Vijayakumar and M. Kawato, Using Humanoid Robots to Study Human Behavior. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Application: Special Issue on Humanoid Robotics 15 (2000) 46-56
W. Bechtel and R.C. Richardson, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization As Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1993).
R.D. Beer, R.D. Quinn, H.J. Chiel and R.E. Ritzmann, Biologically Inspired Approaches to Robotics. Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 30-38
A. Berthoz, Le sens du mouvement. Paris: Odile Jacob (1997).
R. Braithwaite, Scientific Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1953).
A. Caramazza, ???On Drawing Inferences about the Structure of Normal Cognitive Systems from the Analysis of Patterns of Impaired Performance: The Case for Single-Patient Studies???. Brain and Cognition 5 (1986) 41-66
N. Cartwright, Nature???s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1989).
R. Cordeschi, The Discovery of the Artificial. Behavior, Mind and Machines Before and Beyond Cybernetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (2002).
C.F. Craver, Role Functions, Mechanisms and Hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68 (2000) 31-55
C.F. Craver and L. Darden, ???Discovering Mechanisms in Neurobiology: The Case of Spatial Memory???. In: P.K. Machamer, R. Grush and P. McLaughlin (eds.) Theory and Method in Neuroscience. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press (2001) pp. 112-137
R. Cummins, Functional Analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975) 741-765
R. Cummins, The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge: The MIT Press, Bradford Books (1983).
R. Cummins, ???How Does It Works? ???versus??? What Are the Laws????: Two Conception of Psychological Explanation???. In: F.C. Keil and R.A. Wilson (eds.) Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press (2000) pp.
Dario, P., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., Guglielmelli, E., Carrozza, M.C. and Micera, S. (2002), ???Design and Development of a Neurorobotic Human-like ???guinea pig???', in Proceedings of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002, 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Vol. 3, pp. 2345???2346
Datteri, E., Teti, G., Laschi, C., Tamburrini, G., Dario, P. and Guglielmelli, E. (2003a), ???Expected Perception in Robots: A Biologically driven Perception-action Scheme???, in Proceedings of ICAR 2003, 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Vol. 3, pp. 1405???1410
Datteri, E., Teti, G., Laschi, C., Tamburrini, G., Dario, P. and Guglielmelli, E. (2003b), ???Expected Perception: An Anticipation-based Perception-action Scheme in Robots???, in Proceedings of IROS 2003, 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada
H. Feigl, ???The ???orthodox??? View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as well as Critique???. In: M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (1970) pp.
J.A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, Bradford Books (1983).
M. Friedman, ???Explanation and Scientific Understanding???. Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974) 5-19
Glennan, S. (2002), ???Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation???, Philosophy of Science 69, pp. S342???S353
C.G. Hempel and P. Oppenheim, Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15 (1948) 135-175
Horchler, A., Reeve, R., Webb, B. and Quinn. R. (2003), ???Robot Phonotaxis in the Wild: A Biologically Inspired Approach to Outdoor Sound Localization???, in Proceedings of ICAR 2003, 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 1749???1756
W.H. Kirchner and W.F. Towne, The Sensory Basis of the Honeybee???s Dance Language. Scientific American 270 (1994) 74-80
Ph. Kitcher, Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science 48 (1981) 507-531
Kitcher, Ph. (1989), ???Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World???, in Ph. Kitcher and W. Salmon, eds., Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410???499
M. Lange, Who???s Afraid of Ceteris Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love them. Erkenntnis 57 (2002) 407-423
P. Machamer, L. Darden and C.F. Craver, ???Thinking About Mechanisms???. Philosophy of Science 67 (2000) 1-25
D. Marr, ???Artificial Intelligence: A Personal View???. Artificial Intelligence 9 (1977) 37-48
D. Marr, Vision. A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company (1982).
R.C. Miall, D.J. Weir, D.M. Wolpert and J.F. Stein, Is the Cerebellum a Smith Predictor?. Journal of Motor Behaviour 25 (1993) 203-216
R.C. Miall and D.M. Wolpert, Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Networks 9 (1996) 1265-1279
R. M??ller, ???Perception Through Anticipation ??? A Behavior-Based Approach to Visual Perception???. In: A. Riegler, A. Stein von and M. Peschl (eds.) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. New York: Plenum Press (1999) pp.
M??ller, R., Lambrinos, D., Pfeifer, R., Labhart, T. and Wehner, R. (1998), ???Modeling ant Navigation with an Autonomous Agent???, in R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.-A. Meyer and S.W. Wilson, eds., From Animals To Animats 5, pp. 185???194
J.H. Moor, Three Myths of Computer Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1978) 231-243
B.D. Reger, K.M. Fleming, V. Sanguineti, S. Alford and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Connecting Brains to Robots: An Artificial Body for Studying the Computational Properties of Neural Tissues. Artificial life 6 (2000) 307-24
A. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener and J. Bigelow, Behavior, Purpose and Teleology. Philosophy of Science 10 (1943) 18-24
A. Rosenblueth and N. Wiener, The Role of Models in Science. Philosophy of Science 12 (1945) 316-321
W. Salmon, ???Four Decades of Scientific Explanation???. In: Ph. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.) Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press (1989) pp.
W.C. Salmon, Causality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998).
T. Shallice, From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1988).
H. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: The MIT Press (1996).
R. Taylor, Comments on a Mechanistic Conception of Purposefulness: A Rejoinder. Philosophy of Science 17 (1950) 327-332
Trautteur, G., ed., (1995), Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection, Napoli: Bibliopolis
A.M. Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59 (1950) 433-460
B. Webb, Can Robots Make Good Models of Biological Behaviour?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 1033-1050
B. Webb, Robots in Invertebrate Neuroscience. Nature 417 (2002) 359-363
D.M. Wolpert, R.C. Miall and M. Kawato, Internal Models in the Cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1998) 338-347
J. Woodward, What is a Mechanism? A Counterfactual Account. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002) S366-S377
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamburrini, G., Datteri, E. Machine Experiments and Theoretical Modelling: from Cybernetic Methodology to Neuro-Robotics. Mind Mach 15, 335–358 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-2924-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-2924-x