Abstract
Mhealth technology is mushrooming world-wide and, in a variety of forms, reaches increasing numbers of users in ever-widening contexts and virtually independent from standard medical evidence assessment. Yet, debate on the broader societal impact including in particular mapping and classification of ethical issues raised has been limited. This article, as part of an ongoing empirically informed ethical research project, provides an overview of ethical issues of mhealth applications with a specific focus on implications on autonomy as a key notion in the debate. A multi-stage model of references to the potential of mhealth use for strengthening some or other form of self-determination will be proposed as a descriptive tool. It illustrates an assumed continuum of enhanced autonomy via mhealth broadly conceived: from patient to user autonomy, to improved health literacy, and finally to the vision of supra-individual empowerment and democratised, participatory health and medicine as a whole. On closer examination, however, these references are frequently ambivalent or vague, perpetuating the at times uncritical use of established autonomy concepts in medical ethics. The article suggests zooming in on the range of autonomy-related aspects against the backdrop of digital innovation and datafied health more generally, and on this basis add to existing frameworks for the ethical evaluation of mhealth more specifically.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
‘Datafication’ may also be used prescriptively. Couldry and Yu refer to “the process whereby life-processes must be converted into streams of data inputs for computer-based processing” which “is deemed a natural stage of development” (Couldry and Yu 2018: 4473).
These kinds of enhanced autonomy, however, in turn raise new questions as regards the applicability of professional norms and responsibilities such as when lay persons are involved in mobile care offers that blur the boundary to regular psychotherapy (Kreitmair and Cho 2017).
References
Albrecht, Urs-Vito (ed.) 2016. Chancen und Risiken von Gesundheits-Apps (CHARISMHA). http://www.charismha.de/ Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Albrecht, Urs-Vito, and Heiner Fangerau. 2015. Do ethics need to be adapted to mhealth? A plea for developing a consistent framework. World Medical Journal 61 (2): 72–75.
Alpay, Laurence, Paul van der Boog, and Adrie Dumaij. 2011. An empowerment-based approach to developing innovative e-health tools for self-management. Health Informatics Journal 17 (4): 247–255.
Árnason, Vilhjálmur. 2012. The personal is political: Ethics and personalized medicine. Ethical Perspectives 19 (1): 103–122.
Becker, Stefan, Talva Miron-Shatz, Nikolaus Schumacher, Johann Krocza, Clarissa Diamantidis, and Urs-Vito Albrecht. 2014. mhealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2 (2): e24.
Bhuyan, Soumitra, Hyunmin Kim, Oluwaseyi O. Isehunwa, Naveen Kumar, Jay Bhatt, David K. Wyant, et al. 2017. Privacy and security issues in mobile health: Current research and future directions. Health Policy and Technology 6 (2): 188–191.
Brown, Ian, and Andrew A. Adams. 2007. The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare. International Review of Information Ethics 8 (12): 53–60.
Carter, Adrian, Jacki Liddle, Wayne Hall, and Helen Chenery. 2015. Mobile phones in research and treatment: Ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 3 (4): e95.
Char, Danton S., Nigam H. Shah, and David Magnus. 2018. Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine 378 (11): 979–981.
Couldry, Nick, and Jun Yu. 2018. Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world. New Media & Society 20 (12): 4473–4491.
Deutscher Ethikrat. 2017. Big Data und Gesundheit – Datensouveränität als informationelle Freiheitsgestaltung. https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/deutsch/stellungnahme-big-data-und-gesundheit.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Dorn, Spencer D. 2015. Digital health: Hope, hype, and Amara’s law. Gastroenterology 149 (3): 516–520.
European Commission. 2014. Green paper on mobile health (“mHealth”). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/green-paper-mobile-health-mhealth. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Goldstein, Melissa M., and Daniel G. Bowers. 2015. The patient as consumer: Empowerment or commodification? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (1): 162–165.
Grafenstein, M. v. et al. 2018. Nudging: Regulierung durch Big Data und Verhaltenswissenschaften, ABIDA-Gutachten. http://www.abida.de/sites/default/files/ABIDA-Gutachten_Nudging.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Groß, Dominik, and Mathias Schmidt. 2018. E-Health und Gesundheitsapps aus medizinethischer Sicht: wollen wir alles, was wir können? Bundesgesundheitsblatt 61 (3): 349–357.
Hall, Charles S., Edward Fottrell, Sophia Wilkinson, and Peter Byass. 2014. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries—What has been shown to work? Global Health Action 7 (1): 25606.
Ho, Anita, and Oliver Quick. 2018. Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships. BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1): 18.
Kim, Henna, and Bo Xie. 2017. Health literacy in the ehealth era: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 100 (6): 1073–1082.
Kreitmair, Karola V., and Mildred K. Cho. 2017. The neuroethical future of wearable and mobile health technology. In Neuroethics: Anticipating the future, ed. Judy Illes, 80–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kreps, Gary L. 2017. The relevance of health literacy to mHealth. Information Services and Use 37 (2): 123–130.
Krieger, William H. 2013. Medical apps: Public and academic perspectives. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (2): 259–273.
Lemire, Marc. 2010. What can be expected of information and communication technologies in terms of patient empowerment in health? Journal of Health Organization and Management 24 (2): 167–181.
Lin, Trisha T.C., and John Robert Bautista. 2017. Understanding the relationships between mHealth apps’ characteristics, trialability, and mhealth literacy. Journal of Health Communication 22 (4): 346–354.
Lupton, Deborah. 2013. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health 11 (3): 256–270.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2016. Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information. The Information Society 32 (3): 192–199.
Mantwill, Sarah, Maddalena Fiordelli, Ramona Ludolph, and Peter J. Schulz. 2015. EMPOWER-support of patient empowerment by an intelligent self-management pathway for patients: Study protocol. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 15: 18.
Manzeschke, Arne et al. 2015. Ethical questions in the area of age appropriate assisting systems. https://www.nks-mtidw.de/dokumente/meestar-studie-englisch. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Marckmann, Georg. 2016. Ethische Aspekte von eHealth. In ehealth in Deutschland: Anforderungen und Potenziale innovativer Versorgungsstrukturen, ed. Florian Fischer and Alexander Krämer, 83–99. Berlin: Springer.
Maturo, Antonio, and Veronica Moretti. 2018. Digital health and the gamification of life: How apps can promote a positive medicalization. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
Mittelstadt, Brent. 2017. Ethics of the health-related internet of things: A narrative review. Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3): 157–175.
Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–21.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2015. The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: Ethical issues. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Biological_and_health_data_web.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.
Ofili, Elizabeth O., et al. 2018. Democratizing discovery health with n=me. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 129: 215–234.
Patrick, John R. 2015. How mHealth will spur consumer-led healthcare. mHealth 1: 14.
Rich, Emma, and Andy Miah. 2017. Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 84–97.
Risling, Tracie, Juan Martinez, Jeremy Young, and Nancy Thorp-Froslie. 2017. Evaluating patient empowerment in association with eHealth technology: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (9): e329.
Rubeis, Giovanni, Maximilian Schochow, and Florian Steger. 2018. Patient autonomy and quality of care in telehealthcare. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1): 93–107.
Ruckenstein, Minna, and Natasha Dow Schüll. 2017. The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1): 261–278.
Schüll, Natasha Dow. 2016. Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties 11 (3): 317–333.
Sharon, Tamar. 2015. Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: Tactical engagements with genetic testing. BioSocieties 10 (3): 295–316.
Sharon, Tamar. 2017. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy and Technology 30 (1): 93–121.
Smith, Robert J., et al. 2016. Transforming scientific inquiry: Tapping into digital data by building a culture of transparency and consent. Academic Medicine 91 (4): 469–472.
Swan, Melanie. 2012. Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2 (3): 93–118.
Topol, Eric J. 2012. The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books.
Topol, Eric J. 2015. The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books.
Torous, John, and Laura Weiss Roberts. 2017. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health: Transparency and trust. JAMA Psychiatry 74 (5): 437–438.
Funding
This article is part of the research project “Medicine 4.0—the ethical basis of digitalised healthcare” funded by the German Ministry of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmietow, B., Marckmann, G. Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy. Med Health Care and Philos 22, 623–630 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y