Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetics and psychiatry: a proposal for the application of the precautionary principle

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper suggests an application of the precautionary principle to the use of genetics in psychiatry focusing on scientific uncertainty. Different levels of uncertainty are taken into consideration—from the acknowledgement that the genetic paradigm is only one of the possible ways to explain psychiatric disorders, via the difficulties related to the diagnostic path and genetic methods, to the value of the results of studies carried out in this field. Considering those uncertainties, some measures for the use of genetics in psychiatry are suggested. Some of those measures are related to the conceptual limits of the genetic paradigm; others are related to present knowledge and should be re-evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. 1994. DSM-IV Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fourth edition. Washington D.C: American Psychiatric Press.

  • Arribas-Ayllon, M., A. Bartlett, and K. Featherstone. 2010. Complexity and accountability: The witches’ brew of psychiatric genetics. Social Studies of Science 40(4): 499–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borgna, E. 2003. Le intermittenze del cuore. Milano: Feltrinelli. Particularly chapter 1 Paesaggi invisibili (pp. 9–14).

  • Civita, A. 1990. Ricerche filosofiche sulla psichiatria. Milano: Guerini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita, A. 1999. Psicopatologia. Un’introduzione storica. Roma: Carocci (Appendix 3).

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. Bruxelles.

  • Council of Europe. 1997. Convention on human rights and biomedicine. Oviedo.

  • Cowan, W.M., K.L. Kopnisky, and S.E. Hyman. 2002. The human genome project and its impact on psychiatry. Annual Review on Neuroscience 25: 1–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, D.M., B. Riley, and K.S. Kendler. 2010. Nature and nurture in neuropsychiatric genetics: Where do we stand? Dialogues in Clinical Neurosciences 12(1): 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2004. 25 recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing. Bruxelles.

  • European Commission. 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Bruxelles.

  • European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission. 2003. Opinion on the ethical aspects of genetic testing in the workplace. Opinion n.18. Bruxelles.

  • Forzano, F., P. Borry, A. Cambon-Thomsen, S.V. Hodgson, A. Tibben, P. de Vries, et al. 2010. Italian appeal court: A genetic predisposition to commit murder? European Journal of Human Genetics 18: 519–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Human Genetics Commission. 2010. A common framework of principles for direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. London: Human Genetics Commission.

  • Lakoff, A. 2005. Pharmaceutical reason. Knowledge and value in global psychiatry. Cambridge: University Press UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. 1992. Chapter 2. All in the genes? In Biology as ideology. The doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Perennial. (pp. 17–37).

  • Lewontin, R., S. Rose, L. Kamin, 1984. Not in our genes. New York: Pantheon books. Particularly chapter 8 Schizophrenia: the clash of determinisms (pp. 197–231).

  • Liberatore, A., and S. Funtowicz. 2003. Democratising expertise, expertising democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy 30(3): 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, F.J., N. Akula, T.G. Schulze, P. Muglia, F. Tozzi, S.D. Detera-Wadleigh, et al. 2010. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies a risk locus for major mood disorders on 3p21.1. Nature Genetics 42(2): 128–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health’s Genetics Workgroup. 1999. Report. Biological Psychiatry 45: 559–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 1998. Mental disorders and genetics: the ethical context. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002. Genetics and human behaviour: the ethical context. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2003. Pharmacogenetics. Ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

  • Nöthen, M.M., V. Nieratschker, S. Cichon, and M. Rietschel. 2010. New findings in the genetics of major psychoses. Dialogues in Clinical Neurosciences 12(1): 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, M.J., A.G. Cardno, and M.C. O’Donovan. 2000. Psychiatric genetics: Back to the future. Mol Psychiatry 5(1): 22–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., J.C. DeFries, G.E. McClearn, and P. McGuffin. 2001. Behavioral genetics, 4th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Coordinating Committee. 2009. Genomewide association studies: History, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry 166: 540–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., A. Pickles, R. Murray, and L. Eaves. 2001. Testing hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behaviour. Psychological Bulletin 127: 291–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., and R. Plomin. 1997. Opportunities for psychiatry from genetic findings. The British Journal of Psychiatry 171(9): 209–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius, N. 2006. Lessons from a 10-year global programme against stigma and discrimination because of an illness. Psychology, Health and Medicine 11(3): 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyn, S.I., J. Shi, J.B. Kraft, J.B. Potash, J.A. Knowles, M.M. Weissman, et al. 2011. Novel loci for major depression identified by genome-wide association study of sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression and meta-analysis of three studies. Molecular Psychiatry 16: 202–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. 1997. Mad house: growing up in the shadow of mentally ill siblings. New York City: Doubleday. Adapted from the book. In National Institute of Mental Health’s Genetics Workgroup. Report. Biological Psychiatry 45: 559–602. p. 560.

  • Sullivan, P.F., M.C. Neale, and K.S. Kendler. 2000. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: Review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry 157: 1552–1562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uher, R., N. Perroud, M.Y. Ng, J. Hauser, N. Henigsberg, W. Maier, et al. 2010. Genome-wide pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response in the GENDEP Project. The American Journal of Psychiatry 167: 555–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 1997. Universal declaration on human genome and human rights. Paris: UNESCO.

  • United Nation. 1992. The Rio declaration on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro: United Nation.

  • World Health Organization. 2001. The world health report 2001. Mental health. New understanding, new hope. Geneva. Particularly chapter 2 Burden of mental and behavioural disorders (pp. 19–44).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioethics Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy

    Corinna Porteri

Authors
  1. Corinna Porteri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Porteri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porteri, C. Genetics and psychiatry: a proposal for the application of the precautionary principle. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 391–397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9408-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9408-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation