Abstract
“HTA is a multidisciplinary process that summarizes information about the medical, social, economic and ethical issues related to the use of a health technology in a systematic, transparent, unbiased, robust manner. Its aim is to inform the formulation of safe, effective, health policies that are patient focused, and seek to achieve best value” (EUnetHTA 2007). Even though the assessment of ethical aspects of a health technology is listed as one of the objectives of a HTA process, in practice, the integration of these dimensions into reports remains limited. The article is focused on four points: 1. the HTA concept; 2. the difficult HTA-ethics relationship; 3. the ethical issues in HTA; 4. the methods for integrating ethical analysis into HTA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The EUnetHTA Project has concluded its work with a conference on “HTA’s Future in Europe” held in Paris on November 20, 2008 and it is going to begin a permanent activity, named EUnetHTA Collaboration.
On this matter, A.J. Braunack-Mayer (2006) claims a distinction between ethical assessment in HTA (“it takes as its object of interest the analysis of ethical problems as they arise within the context of new technologies”) and ethical assessment of HTA (“it is concerned with studying such as the organizational structure, role relationship, value system, rituals, and functions as a system of behaviour”).
This approach is adopted by the Institute of Bioethics of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome (Italy).
References
Ashcroft, R.E. 1999. Ethics and health technology assessment. Monash Bioethics Review 18(2): 15–24.
Autti-Rämö, I., and M. Mäkelä. 2007. Ethical evaluation in health technology assessment reports: An eclectic approach. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 23: 1–8.
Banta, H.D. 2003. The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy 2: 121–132.
Battista, R.N. 1996. Towards a paradigm for technology assessment. In Scientific basis of health services, ed. M. Peckham, and R. Smith, 11–18. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
Braunack-Mayer, A.J. 2006. Ethics and health technology assessment: Handmaiden and/or critic? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 22(3): 307–312.
Carrasco de Paula, I. 2004. Il concetto di persona e la sua rilevanza assiologia: i principi della bioetica personalista. Medicina e Morale 2: 265–278.
Cicchetti, A. 2003. Strategic planning in healthcare organizations: The role of health technology assessment. In Technology, healthcare, management in the hospital of the future, ed. E. Geisler, K. Krabbendam, and R. Schuring. Westport-London: Praeger.
Cicchetti, A., and M. Marchetti. 1999. La valutazione delle tecnologie sanitarie: da supporto al policy making alla gestione manageriale dei servizi. Progettare per la Sanita 50: 65–72.
Droste, S., A. Gerhardus, and R. Kollek. 2003. Methoden zur Erfassung ethischer Aspekte und gesellschaftlicher Wertvorstellungen in Kurtz-HTA-Berichten—eine internationale Bestandsaufnahme—Band 9. Niebüll: Videel.
Ellul, J. 1954. La technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.
European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). 2007. HTA definition. Internet On line ed. http://www.eunethta.net/HTA/.
Goodman, C.S. 2004. HTA 11. Introduction to health technology assessment. Falls Church, Virginia: The Lewin Group. Internet On line ed. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/hta101.pdf.
Heitman, E. 1998. Ethical issues in technology assessment. Conceptual categories and procedural considerations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14(3): 544–566.
Hofmann, B. 2005. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. International Journal of Health Technology Assessment 21(3): 312–318.
International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assess-ment (INAHTA). 2006. Health technology assessment (HTA) glossary. Stockholm (Internet On line ed. http://www.sbu.se/filer/content11/document/Edu_INHTA_glossary_ 2006_final).
Jonas, H. 1987. Technik, Medizin end Ethik. Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Lampe, K., and M. Mäkelä. HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions. First public draft, revised 11 July 2007 (Work in progress, Internet On line ed. http://www.eunethta.net/upload/WP4/EUnetHTA_WP4_CoreModelforInterventions_FirstPublicDraftRevised-2007-07-11.pdf).
Lehoux, P., and S. Blume. 2000. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25(6): 1083–1118.
Lucioni, C. 1986. Economia e salute. Medicina e Morale 4: 777–786.
Maritain, J. 1951. Neuf leçons sur les notions premières de la philosophie morale. Paris: Téqui.
Pessina, A. 1999. Bioetica. L’uomo sperimentale. Milano: Bruno Mondatori.
Preston, T.A. 1989. Assessment of coronary bypass surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 5: 431–442.
Saarni, S.I., B. Hofmann, K. Lampe, D. Lühmann, M. Mäkelä, M. Velasco-Garrido, and I. Autti-Rämö. 2008. Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86(8): 617–623.
Sacchini, D., and P. Refolo. 2007. L’health technology assessment (HTA) e i suoi aspetti etici. Medicina e Morale 1: 101–139.
Sacchini, D., A.G. Spagnolo, R. Minacori, and I. Carrasco de Paula. 2005. HTA and ethics: The framework of ethical positions and the proposal of a person-centred model. Italian Journal of Public Health 2(2): 304.
Seifert, J. 1989. Essere e Persona. Verso una fondazione fenomenologica di una metafisica classica e personalista. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
Sgreccia, E. 1986. Bioetica. Manuale per medici e biologi. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
Sgreccia, E. 2007. Manuale di Bioetica. I. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica, 4th ed. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
ten Have, H. 1995. Medical technology assessment and ethics. Ambivalent relations. Hastings Center Report 25(5): 13–19.
ten Have, H. 2004. Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20(1): 71–76.
Vanara, F. 1998. Metodologie di valutazione economica delle tecnologie innovative in sanita`’. In La valutazione economica in sanità: Una introduzione, ed. A. Bariletti, and N. Parmentola, 197–233. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof. M. Mäkelä and Dr. K. Lampe, editors of the HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions within the EUnetHTA Project for the permission to quote data about it. Moreover, we are very grateful to Prof. I. Autti-Rämö, Work Package (WP) 4 Lead Partner’s coordinating team, Prof. S. Saarni and Prof. B. Hofmann, authors within the WP4 for the precious suggestions and comments on the paper. Finally, we would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sacchini, D., Virdis, A., Refolo, P. et al. Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects. Med Health Care and Philos 12, 453–457 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9206-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9206-y