Abstract
Bioethical research has tended to focus on theoretical discussion of the principles on which the analysis of ethical issues in biomedicine should be based. But this discussion often seems remote from biomedical practice where researchers and physicians confront ethical problems. On the other hand, published empirical research on the ethical reasoning of health care professionals offer only descriptions of how physicians and nurses actually reason ethically. The question remains whether these descriptions have any normative implications for nurses and physicians? In this article, we illustrate an approach that integrates empirical research into the formulation of normative ethical principles using the moral-philosophical method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium (WRE). The research method discussed in this article was developed in connection with the project ‘Bioethics in Theory and Practice’. The purpose of this project is to investigate ethical reasoning in biomedical practice in Denmark empirically. In this article, we take the research method as our point of departure, but we exclusively discuss the theoretical framework of the method, not its empirical results. We argue that the descriptive phenomenological hermeneutical method developed by Lindseth and Norberg (2004) and Pedersen (1999) can be combined with the theory of WRE to arrive at a decision procedure and thus a foundation for the formulation of normative ethical principles. This could provide health care professionals and biomedical researchers with normative principles about how to analyse, reason and act in ethically difficult situations in their practice. We also show how to use existing bioethical principles as inspiration for interpreting the empirical findings of qualitative studies. This may help researchers design their own empirical studies in the field of ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp T.L. (2003). A Defense of the Common Morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13(3):259–274
Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. (1989). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Christiansen K. (2003). The Condition of Understanding in H.-G. Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Australia, The University of Melbourne
Daniels N. (1979). Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76:257–282
Delden J.J.M. van (2002). Moral Intuitions as a Source for Empirical Ethics. Politeia XVIII(67):20–24
Delden J.J.M., van Thiel G.J.M.W. Van (1998). Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model in Bioethics. In: van der Burg W., van Willigenburg T. (eds). Reflective Equilibrium. The Nederlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 251–259
Gadamer, H.-G.: 1960, Truth and Method. 2. rev. ed. translation revised by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2003
Kappel, K.: 2006, ‘The Metajustification of Reflective Equilibrium’, Journal of Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Forthcoming
Kvale S. (1983). The Qualitative Research Interview — A Phenomenological and a Hermeneutical Mode of Understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14:171–196
Kvale S. (1997). Interview. Denmark, Hans Reitzels Forlag
Lindseth A., Norberg A. (2004). A Phenomenological Hermeneutical Method for Researching Lived Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 18:145–153
Lindseth A., Marhaug V., Norberg A., Udén G. (1994). ‘Registered Nurses’ and Physicians’ Reflections on their Narratives about Ethically Difficult Care Episodes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 20:245–250
Loegstrup K.E. (1993). Norm and Spontaneity. Denmark: Gyldendal (first published in 1972)
Loegstrup K.E. (1997). Concepts and Problems in Ethics. Denmark: Gyldendal (first published in 1971)
Molewijk B., Stiggelbout A.M., Otten W., Dupuis H.M., Kievit J. (2004). Empirical Data and Moral Theory. A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7:55–69
Pedersen, B.D.: 1999, Nursing Practice, Language and Cognition. Ph.D.-Thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark
Pedersen, B.D. and C. Delmar: 2003, ‘Research Method and Network Collaboration — A Qualitative Method inspired by Ricoeur’, in Research in Nursing Practice 2. Methods and Development of Knowledge. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag
Petersson B. (1998). Wide Reflective Equilibrium and the Justification of Moral Theory. In: van der Burg W., van Willigenburg T. (eds). Reflective Equilibrium. The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 127–134
Rawls J. (1951). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. In: Freeman S. (eds). John Rawls Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, pp. 1–19
Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Fourth Printing, 2001. Cambridge, MA. London: Belknap
Rawls J. (1975). The Independence of Moral Theory. In: Freeman S. (eds). John Rawls Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, pp. 286–303
Rawls J. (2001). Justice as Fairness. A Restatement. Cambridge MA. London, Belknap
Rendtorff, J. and P. Kemp: 2000, Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw. Vol. 1: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability. Denmark: Centre for Ethics and Law
Rossel P. (1986). Empirical Ethics — Its Necessity and Method’, Philosophia 14(3—4),90–103
Scanlon T.M. (2003). Rawls on Justification. In: S. Freeman. (eds). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Svenaeus F. (2003). Hermeneutics of Medicine in the Wake of Gadamer: The Issue of Phronesis. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24:407–431
Udén G., Norberg A., Lindseth A., Marhaug V. (1992). ‘Ethical Reasoning in Nurses’ and Physicians’ Stories about Care Episodes’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 17(9):1028–1034
Walters L., Palmer J. (1997). Ethics of Human Gene Therapy. New York, Oxford University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebbesen, M., Pedersen, B.D. Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine. Med Health Care Philos 10, 33–48 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9011-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9011-9