Skip to main content
Log in

A 3D mesoscale damage-plasticity approach for masonry structures under cyclic loading

  • New Trends in Mechanics of Masonry
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the accurate modelling of unreinforced masonry (URM) behaviour using a 3D mesoscale description consisting of quadratic solid elements for masonry units combined with zero-thickness interface elements, the latter representing in a unified way the mortar and brick–mortar interfaces. A new constitutive model for the unified joint interfaces under cyclic loading is proposed. The model is based upon the combination of plasticity and damage. A multi-surface yield criterion in the stress domain governs the development of permanent plastic strains. Both strength and stiffness degradation are captured through the evolution of an anisotropic damage tensor, which is coupled to the plastic work produced. The restitution of normal stiffness in compression is taken into account by employing two separate damage variables for tension and compression in the normal direction. A simplified plastic yield surface is considered and the coupling of plasticity and damage is implemented in an efficient step by step approach for increased robustness. The computational cost of simulations performed using the mesoscale masonry description is reduced by employing a partitioning framework for parallel computation, which enables the application of the model at structural scale. Numerical results are compared against experimental data on realistic masonry components and structures subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading to show the ability of the proposed strategy to accurately capture the behaviour of URM under different types of loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magenes G, Fontana A (1998) Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of Brick Masonry Society No 8:190–195

  2. Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) Tremuri program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caliò I, Marletta M, Pantò B (2012) A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings. Eng Struct 40:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lourenço PB, Rots JG, Blaauwendraad J (1998) Continuum model for masonry: parameter estimation and validation. J Struct Eng 124(6):642–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calderini C, Lagomarsino S (2008) Continuum model for in-plane anisotropic inelastic behavior of masonry. J Struct Eng 134(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelà L, Cervera M, Roca P (2013) An orthotropic damage model for the analysis of masonry structures. Constr Build Mater 41:957–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6(6):773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carol I, López CM, Roa O (2001) Micromechanical analysis of quasi-brittle materials using fracture-based interface elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(1–2):193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caballero A, Willam K, Carol I (2008) Consistent tangent formulation for 3d interface modeling of cracking/fracture in quasi-brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(33):2804–2822

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lourenço PB, Rots JG (1997) Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J Eng Mech 123(7):660–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Snozzi L, Molinari JF (2013) A cohesive element model for mixed mode loading with frictional contact capability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(5):510–526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira DV, Lourenço PB (2004) Implementation and validation of a constitutive model for the cyclic behaviour of interface elements. Comput Struct 82(17):1451–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aref AJ, Dolatshahi KM (2013) A three-dimensional cyclic meso-scale numerical procedure for simulation of unreinforced masonry structures. Comput Struct 120:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacco E, Toti J (2010) Interface elements for the analysis of masonry structures. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 11(6):354–373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragueneau F, Dominguez N, Ibrahimbegovic A (2006) Thermodynamic-based interface model for cohesive brittle materials: application to bond slip in RC structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(52):7249–7263

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Spada A, Giambanco G, Rizzo P (2009) Damage and plasticity at the interfaces in composite materials and structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(49):3884–3901

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Albarella M, Serpieri R, Alfano G, Sacco E (2015) A 3d multiscale cohesive zone model for quasi-brittle materials accounting for friction, damage and interlocking. Eur J Comput Mech 24(4):144–170

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gambarotta L, Lagomarsino S (1997) Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part I: the mortar joint model and its applications. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(4):423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grassl P, Rempling R (2008) A damage-plasticity interface approach to the meso-scale modelling of concrete subjected to cyclic compressive loading. Eng Fract Mech 75(16):4804–4818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Macorini L, Izzuddin B (2013) Nonlinear analysis of masonry structures using mesoscale partitioned modelling. Adv Eng Softw 60:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Izzuddin BA (2005) An enhanced co-rotational approach for large displacement analysis of plates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64(10):1350–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1415.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Macorini L, Izzuddin B (2011) A non-linear interface element for 3d mesoscale analysis of brick-masonry structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 85(12):1584–1608

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Macorini L, Izzuddin B (2013) Enhanced mesoscale partitioned modelling for unreinforced masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing. 3–6 September, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy

  24. Jokhio G, Izzuddin B (2015) A dual super-element domain decomposition approach for parallel nonlinear finite element analysis. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 16(3):188–212

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Izzuddin BA, Jokhio GA (2016) Mixed-dimensional coupling for parallel partitioned nonlinear finite-element analysis. J Comput Civ Eng 31(3):04016062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Atkinson R, Amadei B, Saeb S, Sture S (1989) Response of masonry bed joints in direct shear. J Struct Eng 115(9):2276–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simo JC, Hughes TJ (2006) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Lourenço PB, Ramos LıSF (2004) Characterization of cyclic behavior of dry masonry joints. J Struct Eng 130(5):779–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reinhardt HW (1984) Fracture mechanics of an elastic softening material like concrete. HERON 29(2):1984

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oliveira DV, Lourenço PB, Roca P (2006) Cyclic behaviour of stone and brick masonry under uniaxial compressive loading. Mater Struct 39(2):247–257. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-005-9050-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Izzuddin B (1991) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of framed structures. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, University of London

  32. Anthoine A, Magonette G, Magenes G (1995) Shear–compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, pp. 1657–1662

  33. Binda L, Tiraboschi C, Mirabella Roberti G, Baronio G, Cardani G (1996) Measuring masonry material properties: detailed results from an extensive experimental research, part i: Tests on masonry components. Rep 5

  34. Griffith MC, Lam NT, Wilson JL, Doherty K (2004) Experimental investigation of unreinforced brick masonry walls in flexure. J Struct Eng 130(3):423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Doherty KT (2000) An investigation of the weak links in the seismic ioad path of unreinforced masonry buildings. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering at The University of Adelaide for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Adelaide

  36. Milani G (2008) 3d upper bound limit analysis of multi-leaf masonry walls. Int J Mech Sci 50(4):817–836

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffith MC, Vaculik J, Lam N, Wilson J, Lumantarna E (2007) Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(6):801–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Magenes G, Kingsley GR, Calvi GM (1995) Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story masonry building: test procedure and measured experimental response. Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche, Gruppo nazionale per la Difesa dai terremoti

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to acknowledge the financial support of the President’s Ph.D. Scholarships of Imperial College London. Additionally, the authors acknowledge the support of the HPC Service of Imperial College London for the computational resources provided for the numerical analyses performed here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bassam A. Izzuddin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minga, E., Macorini, L. & Izzuddin, B.A. A 3D mesoscale damage-plasticity approach for masonry structures under cyclic loading. Meccanica 53, 1591–1611 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0793-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0793-z

Keywords

Navigation