Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Projection Pursuit Random Forest for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) is a fundamental task in mineral exploration. In recent years, the random forest (RF), which is recognized as a significant model for ensemble machine learning algorithms, has been widely used in MPM due to its advantages of high performance and robustness. Nevertheless, the RF method does not fully consider the correlation between variables. In this regard, a hybrid model, namely, the projection pursuit RF (PPRF), has been proposed. In this study, for validation and comparison purposes, the PPRF and ordinary RF methods were employed for the MPM of porphyry Cu–Mo deposits in the Eastern Tianshan orogenic belt, northwestern China, under the same conditions. In the case study, the performance of these two methods was critically investigated. The overall prediction accuracies of the PPRF and RF methods were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and prediction–area plot approaches. To analyze the sensitivity of the PPRF and RF methods to unbalanced data caused by the limited number of known deposits in the study area, the synthetic minority oversampling technique was used to generate a balanced dataset. The results demonstrated that the PPRF method not only outperforms the ordinary RF method in the overall accuracy of MPM but is also less sensitive to unbalanced data than the RF method. Therefore, the PPRF method provides a novel and useful data-driven method with excellent performance for MPM. It utilizes the combination of predictor variables in the projection feature space rather than the variables themselves to identify the inherent characteristics of a given dataset and may thus discover deep hidden features that the ordinary RF method cannot find.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks due to the two anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve this study. This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Nos. 2022YFF0801201, 2021YFC2900300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41872245, U1911202) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2020A1515010666).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Xiao, F. Projection Pursuit Random Forest for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Math Geosci 55, 963–987 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10070-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10070-0

Keywords

Navigation