Skip to main content
Log in

A Theoretical look at Ensemble-Based Optimization in Reservoir Management

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ensemble-based optimization has recently received great attention as a potentially powerful technique for life-cycle production optimization, which is a crucial element of reservoir management. Recent publications have increased both the number of applications and the theoretical understanding of the algorithm. However, there is still ample room for further development since most of the theory is based on strong assumptions. Here, the mathematics (or statistics) of Ensemble Optimization is studied, and it is shown that the algorithm is a special case of an already well-defined natural evolution strategy known as Gaussian Mutation. A natural description of uncertainty in reservoir management arises from the use of an ensemble of history-matched geological realizations. A logical step is therefore to incorporate this uncertainty description in robust life-cycle production optimization through the expected objective function value. The expected value is approximated with the mean over all geological realizations. It is shown that the frequently advocated strategy of applying a different control sample to each reservoir realization delivers an unbiased estimate of the gradient of the expected objective function. However, this procedure is more variance prone than the deterministic strategy of applying the entire ensemble of perturbed control samples to each reservoir model realization. In order to reduce the variance of the gradient estimate, an importance sampling algorithm is proposed and tested on a toy problem with increasing dimensionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akimoto Y, Nagata Y, Ono I, Kobayashi S (2010) Biderectional relation between CMS evolution strategies and natural evolution strategies. PPSN XI Part I LNCS 6238:154–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Amari SI (1998) Natural gradients works efficiently in learning. Neural Comput 10(2):333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarkouna Z, Ding D, Auger A (2011) Well placement optimization with the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and meta-models. Comput Geosci:1–18

  • Brouwer DR, Naevdal G, Jansen JD, Vefring EH, van Kruijsdijk CPJW (2004) Improved reservoir management through optimal control and continuous model updating. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston. Texas, pp 26–29 (SPE90149)

  • Chen Y (2008) Efficient ensemble based reservoir management. Ph.d. thesis, University of Oklahoma

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS (2012) Localization of ensemble-based control-setting updates for production optimization. SPE J 17(1):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS, Zhang D (2009) Efficient ensemble-based closed-loop production optimization. SPE J 14(4):634–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding YD (2008) Optimization of well placement using evolutionary algorithms. In: Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition

  • Do ST, Reynolds AC (2013) Theoretical connections between optimization algorithms based on an approximate gradient. Comput Geosci 17(6):959–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca RM, Leeuwenburgh O, Hof PVD, Jansen JD (2013) Improving the ensemble optimization method through covariance matrix adaptation (cma-enopt). In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium

  • Hansen N, Ostermeier A (1996) Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In: 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, pp 312–317

  • Hansen N, Ostermeier A (2001) Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evol Comput 9(2):159–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan A, Foss B, Sagatun S (2013) Optimization of oil production under gas coning conditions. J Pet Sci Eng 105:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen J (2011) Adjoint-based optimization of multi-phase flow through porous media—a review. Comput Fluids 46:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD, Brouwer DR, Naevdal G, van Kruijsdijk CPJW (2004) Closed-loop reservoir management. In: EAGE 66th Conference & Exhibition. Paris, pp. 7–10 (Presented at Workshop “Uncertainties in production forecasts and history matching”)

  • Leeuwenburgh O, Egberts PJ, Abbink OA (2010) Ensemble methods for reservoir life-cycle optimization and well placement. SPE/DGS Saudi Arabia Sect Tech Symp Exhib 4–7:2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen RJ, Berg AM, Nævdal G, Vefring EH (2006) A new approach for dynamic optimization of water flooding problems. In: SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition. Amsterdam, pp 11–13 (SPE99690)

  • Lozano J, Larranaga P, Inza I, Bengoetxea E (2006) (eds) The CMA Evolution Strategy: a comparing review. Springer, pp 75–102

  • Nwaozo J (2006) Dynamic optimization of a water flood reservoir. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma

  • Peters E et al (2011) Brugge paper SPE REE

  • Pajonk O, Schulze-Riegert R, Krosche M, Hassan M, Nwakile MM (2011) Ensemble-based water flooding optimization applied to mature fields. SPE Middle East Oil Gas Show Conf 25–28:2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Raniolo S, Dovera L, Cominelli A, Callegaro C, Masserano F (2013) History match and polymer injection optimization in a mature field using the ensemble kalman filter. In: 17th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, St. Petersburg, Russia. pp 16–18

  • Rosenbrock H (1960) An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Comput J 3(3):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K, Chen WH (2006) Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model based updating. Comput Geosci 10:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Riegert R, Bagheri M, Krosche M, Kueck N, Ma D (2011) Multiple-objective optimization applied to well path design under geological uncertainty. SPE Reserv Simul Symp 21–23:2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Su H-J, Oliver DS (2010) Smart well production optimization using an ensemble-based method. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 13(6):884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Wierstra D, Schaul T, Schmidhuber J (2009) Efficient natural evolution strategies. In: Proceedings of GECCO. pp 539–545

  • Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory: methods for data fit-ting and model parameter estimation

  • van Essen GM, Zandvliet MJ, van den Hof PMJ, Bosgra OH, Jansen JD (2006) Robust waterflooding optimization of multiple geological scenarios. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Texas (SPE102913)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the Research Council of Norway and the industrial participants, ConocoPhillips Skandinavia AS, BP Norge AS, Det Norske Oljeselskap AS, Eni Norge AS, Maersk Oil Norway AS, DONG Energy AS, Denmark, Statoil Petroleum AS, GDF SUEZ E&P NORGE AS, Lundin Norway AS, Halliburton AS, Schlumberger Norge AS, Wintershall Norge AS, of The National IOR Centre of Norway for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas S. Stordal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stordal, A.S., Szklarz, S.P. & Leeuwenburgh, O. A Theoretical look at Ensemble-Based Optimization in Reservoir Management. Math Geosci 48, 399–417 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9598-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9598-6

Keywords

Navigation