Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Ensemble-Based Optimisation for Petrophysical Inversion

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces a new optimisation algorithm designed for sampling the solution space of non-linear, non-convex quadratic problems. This method has been specifically designed for inversion problems where multiple distinct scenarios must be explored, which would not be achievable with a standard ensemble-based optimisation method (EnOpt). A prior ensemble is used to sample the uncertainty of the parameters before updating each member of the ensemble independently in order to find the minimum of an objective function. This update is given by a Gauss–Newton-like approach, where the first-derivative matrix is adaptively estimated from sub-ensembles of parameters and their corresponding forward model responses. As the first-derivative matrix is statistically computed from an ensemble of realisations, the forward model does not need to be known and the algorithm is independent of it. The final ensemble provides an estimation of the uncertainty after the inversion process. The efficiency of this adaptive ensemble optimisation (A-EnOpt) method is first tested on simple two-dimensional problems where known mathematical functions are used as forward models. The results show that the method minimises the objective functions and samples the final uncertainties of the problems to a better degree than a standard EnOpt. The A-EnOpt method is then applied to a real heavy-oil field petrophysical inversion. Porosity, shale fraction and fluid saturations are inverted under continuity and Lagrange constraints, conditioned by P-impedance models from stochastic seismic inversion. The updated properties are incorporated in a fluid flow model of the field. The simulation results produce a better match to historical production data at one well than equivalent flow simulations using the properties before inversion. This shows that conditioning by seismic data improves the quality of the geological models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buland A, Omre H (2003) Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics 68(1):185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS (2012) Ensemble randomized maximum likelihood method as an iterative ensemble smoother. Math Geosci 44(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS (2013) Levenberg–Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification. Comput Geosci 17(4):689–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad PR, Marzouk YM, Pillai NS, Smith A (2016) Accelerating asymptotically exact MCMC for computationally intensive models via local approximations. J Am Stat Assoc 111(516):1591–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehdari V, Oliver DS et al (2012) Sequential quadratic programming for solving constrained production optimization-case study from Brugge field. SPE J 17(03):874–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyen P (2007) Seismic reservoir characterization: an earth modelling perspective, vol 2. EAGE Publications, Houten

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorkin J, Gutierrez MA, Grana D (2014) Seismic reflections of rock properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emerick AA (2016) Analysis of the performance of ensemble-based assimilation of production and seismic data. J Petrol Sci Eng 139:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerick AA, Reynolds AC (2013) Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Comput Geosci 55:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn 53(4):343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröberg CE (1969) Introduction to numerical analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilhomme T, Oliver DS, Mannseth T, Caumon G, Moyen R, Doyen P (2015) Ensemble-based multi-scale history-matching using second-generation wavelet transform. Comput Geosci 19(5):999–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gineste M, Eidsvik J (2015) Framework for seismic inversion of full waveform data using sequential filtering. In: Petroleum geostatistics 2015, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, cp-456

  • Gineste M, Eidsvik J, Zheng Y (2020) Ensemble-based seismic inversion for a stratified medium. Geophysics 85(1):R29–R39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1989) Matrix computations, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, Oliver DS (2007) An iterative ensemble Kalman filter for multiphase fluid flow data assimilation. SPE J 12(4):438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberti L, Maculan N (2006) Global optimization: volume 84, from theory to implementation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Grana D (2018) Stochastic nonlinear inversion of seismic data for the estimation of petroelastic properties using the ensemble smoother and data reparameterization. Geophysics 83(3):M25–M39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzatto R, Juiniti R, Gomes J, Martins J (2004) The Marlim field development: strategies and challenges. In: Offshore technology conference, offshore technology conference

  • Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moyen R, Doyen P M (2009) Reservoir connectivity uncertainty from stochastic seismic inversion. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2009, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 2378–2382

  • Oliveira RM et al (2008) The Marlim field: incorporating 4D seismic in reservoir-management decisions. J Petrol Technol 60(04):52–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Liu N (2008) Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MJ (1994) A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2014) Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thurin J, Brossier R, Métivier L (2019) Ensemble-based uncertainty estimation in full waveform inversion. Geophys J Int 219(3):1613–1635

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann De Brito D, Moraes R, Emerick AA (2010) The Marlim field: Incorporating time-lapse seismic in the assisted history matching. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, society of petroleum engineers

  • Zhigljavsky A, Žilinskas A (2007) Stochastic global optimization, vol 9. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Petrobras for supporting this work and granting permission to show the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémi Moyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moyen, R., Gentilhomme, T. Adaptive Ensemble-Based Optimisation for Petrophysical Inversion. Math Geosci 53, 349–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09900-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09900-2

Keywords

Navigation