Skip to main content
Log in

Suckers in the morning, skeptics in the evening: Time-of-Day effects on consumers’ vigilance against manipulation

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Persuasion knowledge is defined as a consumer’s vigilance against manipulative persuasion. In this paper, we explore the relationship between persuasion knowledge and consumer’s diurnal preference. It is proposed that evening-type consumers display enhanced persuasion knowledge relative to morning types. Also, heightened persuasion knowledge is exhibited during their respective optimal times of day for both morning-type and evening-type consumers. We propose cognitive resource availability as the key underlying mechanism for this relationship. Finally, we also demonstrate an analogous relationship between consumer skepticism and diurnal preferences. Over three studies we find supportive evidence for our claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adan, A., & Almirall, H. (1991). Horne and Östbergmorningness-eveningnessquestionnaire: A reduced scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff, J. (1965). Circadian rhythms in man. Science, 148, 1427–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. J. F. (1967). Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasks. Psychonomic Science, 9(6), 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biss, R. K., & Hasher, H. (2012). Happy as a lark: Morning-type younger and older adults are higher in positive affect. Emotion, 12(3), 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, E. D., Yoo, S., & Takahashi, J. S. (2010). Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science, 330(6002), 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of persuasion knowledge in Consumer Research. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., & Cavallera, G. (2007). Morning and evening types and creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluation: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 653–675). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. A., & Ostberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4(1), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J., & Tal, A. (2010). The effect of synchronizing consumers’ diurnal preferences with time of response on data reliability. Marketing Letters, 21(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, I. W. P., & Wyer, R. S. (2008). The role of implicit theories in the impact of problem-solving print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dalgeish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 521–539). Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S., & Perina, K. (2009). Why night owls are more intelligent. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 685–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S. (2010). Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research. American Psychologist, 65, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. (J.). (2007). Vigilant against manipulation: The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 688–701.

  • Martin, P. Y., Hamilton, V. E., McKimmie, B. M., Terry, D. J., & Martin, R. (2007). Effects of caffeine on persuasion and attitude change: The role of secondary tasks in manipulating systematic message processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 320–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1993). Optimal time of day and the magnitude of age differences in memory. Psychological Science, 4(5), 326–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, T., & Dickinson, D. L. (2010). Thoughtful days and valenced nights: How much will you think about the problem? Judgment and Decision Making, 5(7), 516–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muro, A., Gomà-i-Freixanet, M., & Adan, A. (2009). Morningness–eveningness, sex, and the alternative five factor model of personality. Chronobiology International, 26(6), 1235–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natale, V., & Cicogna, P. (2002). Morningness–eveningness dimension: is it really a continuum? Personality and Individual Difference, 32(5), 809–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehm, H. A., & Roehm, M. L. (2004). Variety-seeking and time of day: Why leader brands hope young adults shop in the afternoon, but follower brands hope for morning. Marketing Letters, 15(4), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. D., & Kyllonen, P. C. (1999). Morningness–eveningness and intelligence: Early to bed, early to rise will likely make you anything but wise. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1123–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L., Hatfield, C., & Hofstetter, M. (2002). Caffeine reduces time-of-day effects on memory performance in older adults. Psychological Science, 13(1), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P. (2007). A time to think: Circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(7), 755–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonetti, L. M. S., Fabbri, M., & Natale, V. (2009). Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains. Chronobiology International, 26(2), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, P. R. (1978). Application of selective attention theory to television advertising displays. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(June), 366–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. P., Jr., Hull, J. T., & Czeisler, C. A. (2002). Relationship between alertness, performance, and body temperature in humans. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 283(6), 1370–1377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh Saini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, M.T., Saini, R. Suckers in the morning, skeptics in the evening: Time-of-Day effects on consumers’ vigilance against manipulation. Mark Lett 25, 109–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9247-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9247-0

Keywords

Navigation