Abstract
A valid procedure for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) is crucial in designing optimal pricing policies or for estimating demand for new products. Understanding potential sources of differences in WTP estimates that emerge from value elicitation studies constitutes an important step in research on how managers should estimate consumers’ WTP. This research presents an empirical analysis of two potential sources of differences and discusses possible means of mitigating them. We find substantial and significant differences between the WTP reported by subjects when payment of the stated price is real or hypothetical. Notwithstanding the dichotomy between real and hypothetical WTP, we find significant differences among the WTP estimates of a broad range of value elicitation methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M.H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232.
Ben-Akiva, M., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T., Oppewal, H., & Rao, V. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data. Marketing Letters, 5(4), 335–350.
Botelho, A., & Pinto, L.C. (2002). Hypothetical, real, and predicted real willingness to pay in open-ended surveys: Experimental results. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 993–996.
Cummings, R.G., & Taylor, L.O. (1999). Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. The American Economic Review, 89(3), 649–665.
Ding, M., Grewal, R., & Liechty, J. (2005). Incentive-aligned Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 67–82.
Frykblom, P. (2000). Willingness to pay and the choice of question format: Experimental results. Applied Economics Letters, 7, 665–667.
Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, D.J., Chakravarti, D., Field, R.A., & Whipple, G.D. (1993). Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef. Marketing Science, 12(3), 318–338.
Johannesson, M., Liljas, B., & O’Conor, R.M. (1997). Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay: Some experimental results. Applied Economic Letters, 4, 149–151.
Kagel, J.H. (1995). Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research. In: Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (eds.), The handbook of experimental economics, Princeton University Press, pp. 501–585.
Kagel, J.H., Harstad, R.M., & Levin, D. (1987). Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auction with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study. Econometrica, 55, 1275–1304.
Kagel, J.H. & Levin, D. (1993). Independent private value auctions: Bidder behavior in first-, second- and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Economic Journal, 103, 868–879.
Kalish, S., & Nelson, P., (1991). A Comparison of Ranking, Rating and Reservation Price Measurement in Conjoint Analysis. Marketing Letters, 2(4), 327–335.
Kohli, R., & Mahajan, V. (1991). A Reservation-price Model for Optimal Pricing of Multiattribute Products in Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 347–354.
McAfee, R.P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 699–738.
Mitchell, R.C., & Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Neill, H.R., Cummings, R.G., Ganderton, P.T., Harrison, G.W., & McGuckin, T. (1994). Hypothetical Surveys, Provision Rules, and Real Economics Commitments. Land Economics, 70, 145–154.
Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2004). Revealing consumers’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey Auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 725–741.
Rutström, E.E. (1998). Home-grown values and incentive compatible design. International Journal of Game Theory, 27, 427–441.
Sattler, H., & Hensel-Börner, S. (2003). A Comparison of Conjoint Measurement with Self-Explicated Approaches. In: Gustafsson, A., Herrmann A., and Huber, F. (eds.), Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 147–159.
Smith, V.L. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66(2), 274–279.
Srinivasan, V.S., & Shocker, A.D. (1981). LINMAP IV—Users’ Manual, Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Judgments.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.
Wertenbroch, K., & Skiera, B. (2002). Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 228–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voelckner, F. An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay. Market Lett 17, 137–149 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-5147-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-5147-x