Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neighborhood Mapping and Evaluation: A Methodology for Participatory Community Health Initiatives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: This paper describes the use of neighborhood mapping as a key element in an ecological study of a community-based urban infant mortality prevention program. We propose the use of neighborhood mapping in evaluation research to more fully examine the local context of community health programs. Mapping can be used to study community change and to describe community assets and structural, epidemiological, and social features of neighborhoods that may influence program implementation and outcomes. Methods: Data on physical features were collected by community residents during street-by-street neighborhood walkthroughs. Other data sources included program records, Census, birth certificate, and state and city data. Analytic methods included geo-coding, exploratory factor analysis to create spatial density indicators of neighborhood features at the Census block group level, and analysis of associations between neighborhood features and outcomes. Results: Point and chloropleth maps provide a powerful illustration of neighborhood features (e.g., vacant buildings), client distribution and participation, health outcomes, and change over time. Factor analysis indicated two salient clusters of non-residential land use: (1) legitimate daily usage (liquor stores and other businesses) and (2) non-legitimate daily use (houses of worship and vacant buildings). A composite scale was created to indicate overall risk related to physical neighborhood features. Conclusions: Neighborhood mapping is a powerful tool that brings participants and residents into the research process. Moreover, it can improve understanding of the role of neighborhood ecology in program implementation and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Map. 1
Map. 2
Map. 3
Map. 4
Map. 5
Map. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine, The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st Century. 2003, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  2. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the web of causation: Has anyone seen the spider? Soc Sci Med 1994;39:887–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krieger N. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:668–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yen IH, Syme SL. The social environment and health: A discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Ann Rev Public Health 1999;20:287–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGwin G, et al. A focused educational intervention can promote the proper application of seat belts during pregnancy. J Trauma 2004;56(5):1016–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rivera JA, et al. Impact of the Mexican program for education, health, and nutrition (Progresa) on rates of growth and anemia in infants and young children: A randomized effectiveness study. JAMA 2004;291(21):2639–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy SS, Cardinal BJ. Effects of a self-determination theory-based mail-mediated intervention on adults’ exercise behavior. Am J Health Promot 2004;18(5):345–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benavides-Vaello S, et al. Using focus groups to plan and evaluate diabetes self-management interventions for Mexican-Americans. Diabet Edu 2004;30(2):242–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pawson R. The ABC of evaluation. Am J Eval 2005:26(4):582–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnette JJ, Wallis AB. The missing treatment design element: Continuity of treatment when multiple postobservations are used in time-series and repeated measures study designs. Am J Eval 2005;26(1):106–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mann TE, Schorr LB. Learning What Works: Evaluating Complex Social Interventions. In: Learning What Works: Evaluating Complex Social Interventions, October 22, 1997, 1998. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

  12. Durkheim E. Suicide, A Study in Sociology. In: Simpson G. editor. 1897, 1951, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

  13. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Auerswald CL, et al. Qualitative assessment of venues for purposive sampling of hard-to-reach youth: An illustration of a Latino community. Sex Transm Dis 2004;31(2):133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blake BJ, Bentov L. Geographical mapping of unmarried teen births and selected sociodemographic variables. Public Health Nurs 2001;18(1):33–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ernst JS. Mapping child maltreatment: Looking at neighborhoods in a suburban county. Child Welfare 2000;79(5):555–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siegel C, et al. Geographic analysis of pertussis infection in an urban area: A tool for health services planning. Am J Public Health 1997;87(12):2022–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hackbarth DP, et al. Collaborative research and action to control the geographic placement of outdoor advertising of alcohol and tobacco products in Chicago. Public Health Rep 2001;116(6):558–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichter M. Project community diagnosis: Participatory research as a first step toward community involvement in primary health care. Soc Sci Med 1984;19(3):237–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown MP. Risk mapping as a tool for community based participatory research and organizing. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003, p. 446–50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Healthy Start Association Inc. National Healthy Start Association [cited 12/18/2006]: Available from: http://www. healthystartassoc.org/.

  22. Aronson R, et al. Ethnographically informed community evaluation: A framework and approach for evaluating multi-faceted community-based initiatives. Matern Child Health J, in press.

  23. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freire P. Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In: Hall BL, Gillette A, Tandon R, editors. Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues 1946;2:34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Israel B, et al. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodman R. Community-based participatory research: Questions and challenges to an essential approach. J Public Health Manag 2001;7(5):v–vi.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Israel B, et al. The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: Development, implementation, and evaluation. J Public Health Manag 2001;7(5):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hatch J, et al. Community research: Partnership in black communities. Am J Prev Med 1993;9(2):27–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aronson R. The Community Evaluation of Baltimore Healthy Start: A Systematic Approach to Studying Community Participation and Social Change. Proposal for Research. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of International Health; 1993.

  31. Whitehead TL. In search of soul food. In: Baer H, Jones Y, editors. African Americans in the South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perkins D, Meeks J, Taylor RB. The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. J Environ Pscychol 1992;12:21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Orr ST, et al. Psychosocial stressors and low birthweight in an urban population. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:459–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Institute of Medicine. Preventing low birthweight. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eng E, Hatch J, Callan A. Institutionalizing social support through the church and into the community. Health Educ Q 1985;12(1):81–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA

    Robert E. Aronson

  2. Department of Community & Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, E223 GH, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    Anne B. Wallis

  3. Centre for Research on Inner City Health, University of Toronto, 70 Richmond Street E. 4th Floor Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W, USA

    Patricia J. O’Campo

  4. Baltimore City Healthy Start, Inc. Maternal, Infant Care & Special Projects, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Peter Schafer

Authors
  1. Robert E. Aronson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne B. Wallis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia J. O’Campo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Schafer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Aronson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronson, R.E., Wallis, A.B., O’Campo, P.J. et al. Neighborhood Mapping and Evaluation: A Methodology for Participatory Community Health Initiatives. Matern Child Health J 11, 373–383 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0184-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0184-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation