Abstract
Recently, those examining the role teachers of language minority students play in the language policy-making process have found that their autonomy has been threatened by increasing standardization as reflected in rigid one-size fits all curricular mandates focused on the learning of discrete skills in the national language, enforced high-stakes standardized testing, and external monitoring. Given the pervasive nature of this policy environment, we are heartened by our experiences working with a teacher collective in Northern California that has resisted policies of standardization requiring them to teach in ways that ignore students’ instructional needs, interests, and experiences. In elucidating a perspective that considers all educational stakeholders, including teachers, as engaged in the LPP process, this article provides an account of how the collective is negotiating educational policies concerning the teaching of language and literacy to students designated as English language learners. As a members of the collective, the authors draw on participatory and ethnographic approaches to describe how resistance and agency are implicated in the LPP processes, paying special attention to the processes, actions, and impacts that have comprised our collaboration. In addition to discussing how these findings contribute to a dynamic and complex view of the role teacher agency and resistance play in the LPP process, the authors discuss the implications of their findings for promoting agentive teacher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.
Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Archer, M. (1990). Human agency and social structure: a critique of Giddens. In J. Clark, C. Modil & S. Modgil (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: consensus and controversy, (pp. 73–84). London: The Falmer Press.
Bomer, R., & Maloch, B. (2011). Relating policy to research and practice: The Common Core Standards. Language Arts, 89(1), 38–43.
Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Realizing opportunities for English learners in the Common Core English Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy Standards. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Compton, M., & Weiner, L. (2008). The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their unions: Stories for resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
García, O., & Menken, K. (2010). Stirring the onion: Educators and the dynamics of language education policies (looking ahead). In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 249–261). New York: Routledge.
Gibson, R. (2003). Can communities of resistance and transformation be born from the social context of school? Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 41–55.
Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher Resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103, 377–405.
Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertories of practices. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Hall, K., Ozark, C., & Vallya, Y. (1999). Curriculum reform, with particular reference to primary literacy, in contemporary English and Norwegian official documents. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 10(1), 85–112.
Harper, C. A., de Jont, E., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy, 7, 267–284.
Hêlot, C., & Young, A. (2006). Imagining multilingual education in France: A language and cultural awareness project at primary level. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools. Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 69–90). Cleveland, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Hodson, R. (1995). Worker resistance: An underdeveloped concept in the sociology of work. Economic and industrial democracy, 16, 79–110.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1988). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in American’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Labaree, D. (1992). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 123–155.
Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across cultural borders: Policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.
Mirra, N., & Morrell, E. (2012). Teachers as civic agents: Toward a Critical democratic theory of urban teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(8), 408–420.
Moe, T. (2001). A union by any other name. Education Next, 1(3), 40–45.
Munro, P. (1998). Subject to fiction: women teachers’ life history narrative and the cultural politics of resistance. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2008). Negotiating a top-down reading program mandate: The experiences of one school. Language Arts, 86(1), 32–41.
Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2012). Teachers of English learners negotiating authoritarian policies. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2002). From Weapons of the weak. In S. Duncombe (Ed.), Cultural resistance reader (pp. 89–96). London: Verso.
Shilling, C. (1992). Reconceptualizing Structure and Agency in the Sociology of Education: Structuration Theory and Schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), 69–87.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. (2010). California’s teaching force 2010: Key issues and trends. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
Valdés, G., Capitelli, S., & Alvarez, L. (2011). Latino children learning English: Steps in the journey. New York: Teachers College Press.
Vásquez, O., Pease-Alvarez, L., & Shannon, S. (1994). Pushing boundaries: Language and culture in a Mexicano community. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warren, M. R., & Mapp, K. L. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhang, Y., & Hu, G. (2010). Between intended and enacted curricula: Three teachers and a mandated curricular reform in mainland China. In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 12–142). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pease-Alvarez, L., Thompson, A. Teachers working together to resist and remake educational policy in contexts of standardization. Lang Policy 13, 165–181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9313-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9313-8