Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers working together to resist and remake educational policy in contexts of standardization

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, those examining the role teachers of language minority students play in the language policy-making process have found that their autonomy has been threatened by increasing standardization as reflected in rigid one-size fits all curricular mandates focused on the learning of discrete skills in the national language, enforced high-stakes standardized testing, and external monitoring. Given the pervasive nature of this policy environment, we are heartened by our experiences working with a teacher collective in Northern California that has resisted policies of standardization requiring them to teach in ways that ignore students’ instructional needs, interests, and experiences. In elucidating a perspective that considers all educational stakeholders, including teachers, as engaged in the LPP process, this article provides an account of how the collective is negotiating educational policies concerning the teaching of language and literacy to students designated as English language learners. As a members of the collective, the authors draw on participatory and ethnographic approaches to describe how resistance and agency are implicated in the LPP processes, paying special attention to the processes, actions, and impacts that have comprised our collaboration. In addition to discussing how these findings contribute to a dynamic and complex view of the role teacher agency and resistance play in the LPP process, the authors discuss the implications of their findings for promoting agentive teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1990). Human agency and social structure: a critique of Giddens. In J. Clark, C. Modil & S. Modgil (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: consensus and controversy, (pp. 73–84). London: The Falmer Press.

  • Bomer, R., & Maloch, B. (2011). Relating policy to research and practice: The Common Core Standards. Language Arts, 89(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Realizing opportunities for English learners in the Common Core English Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy Standards. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, M., & Weiner, L. (2008). The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their unions: Stories for resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, O., & Menken, K. (2010). Stirring the onion: Educators and the dynamics of language education policies (looking ahead). In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 249–261). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. (2003). Can communities of resistance and transformation be born from the social context of school? Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher Resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103, 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertories of practices. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., Ozark, C., & Vallya, Y. (1999). Curriculum reform, with particular reference to primary literacy, in contemporary English and Norwegian official documents. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 10(1), 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. A., de Jont, E., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy, 7, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hêlot, C., & Young, A. (2006). Imagining multilingual education in France: A language and cultural awareness project at primary level. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools. Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 69–90). Cleveland, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. (1995). Worker resistance: An underdeveloped concept in the sociology of work. Economic and industrial democracy, 16, 79–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1988). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in American’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. (1992). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across cultural borders: Policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirra, N., & Morrell, E. (2012). Teachers as civic agents: Toward a Critical democratic theory of urban teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(8), 408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (2001). A union by any other name. Education Next, 1(3), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, P. (1998). Subject to fiction: women teachers’ life history narrative and the cultural politics of resistance. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2008). Negotiating a top-down reading program mandate: The experiences of one school. Language Arts, 86(1), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2012). Teachers of English learners negotiating authoritarian policies. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (2002). From Weapons of the weak. In S. Duncombe (Ed.), Cultural resistance reader (pp. 89–96). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (1992). Reconceptualizing Structure and Agency in the Sociology of Education: Structuration Theory and Schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. (2010). California’s teaching force 2010: Key issues and trends. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, G., Capitelli, S., & Alvarez, L. (2011). Latino children learning English: Steps in the journey. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez, O., Pease-Alvarez, L., & Shannon, S. (1994). Pushing boundaries: Language and culture in a Mexicano community. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. R., & Mapp, K. L. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Hu, G. (2010). Between intended and enacted curricula: Three teachers and a mandated curricular reform in mainland China. In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 12–142). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucinda Pease-Alvarez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pease-Alvarez, L., Thompson, A. Teachers working together to resist and remake educational policy in contexts of standardization. Lang Policy 13, 165–181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9313-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9313-8

Keywords

Navigation