Skip to main content
Log in

An ancestral language to speak with the “Other”: closing down ideological spaces of a language policy in the Peruvian Andes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a multilayered, ethnographic and critical approach to language policy and planning, this article examines a language policy favoring Quechua in Apurímac in the Southern Peruvian Andes, which is being imagined as an integrated community unified by the local language. This study presents a case in which top-down policies open up ideological spaces, while other layers of the policy process obstruct them due to particular interpretations of official declarations. In fact, although official documents indicate a repertoire of Quechua as “our” language for regional integration, Quechua-speaking civil servants and teachers present another, very extended repertoire that portrays Quechua as an ancestral language, important to use only when interacting with the “Other” or with the “pure” Quechua speaker from high-altitude communities. The data analyzed here not only confirms, once more, that various layers of the language policy process can contradict each other, but also that dilemmas exist within the individuals themselves due to the ambivalent colonial structure of Apurimenian society. Thus, while Quechua is associated with subordinated and disdained peasants, officials and teachers also value it as part of “our culture,” and in that sense they identify with it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikman, S. (2003). La educación indígena en sudamérica. Interculturalidad y bilingüismo en Madre de Dios, Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asociación Educativa Saywa. (2010). Cultura andina y lengua quechua. Andahuaylas: DREA, SAYWA & LED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M. (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 398–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degregori, C. I., & Huber, L. (2007). Cultura, poder y desarrollo rural. Lima: SEPIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección Regional de Educación de Apurímac. (2011). Apurimaq suyupi pusaq chanin yuyaymanay qichwa simi aswan mastarinapaq. Ocho muy buenas razones para generalizar el quechua en Apurímac. Abancay: DREA.

  • Dirección Regional de Educación de Apurímac. Cultura andina y lengua quechua. Módulos de capacitación (nivel básico e intermedio). Unpublished manuscript. Abancay, Apurímac.

  • Edley, N. (2001). Analyzing masculinity: Interpertative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (2004). Building on community bilingualism. Philadelphia: Caslon.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, M. E. (2005). Making indigenous citizens. Identity development, and multicultural activism in Perú. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno Regional de Apurímac. Generalización del quechua en la región Apurímac 2008–2021. Abancay: Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the ‘Other’. In Stuart Hall (Ed.), Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–74). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (2007). Bilingualism as ideology and practice. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: a social approach (pp. 1–22). New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. (2000). Bilingual education policy and practice in the andes: Ideological paradox and intercultural possibility. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31(2), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. (2009). Multilingual education policy and practice: Ten certainties (grounded in indigenous experience). Language Teaching, 42(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N., & Johnson, D. C. (2010). The ethnography of language policy. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 273–289). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (2007). Por los linderos de la lengua Ideologías lingüísticas en los Andes. Lima: IFEA, Fondo Editorial de la PUCP & IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística del Perú. (2001). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares (ENAHO). Lima: INEI.

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Perú. (2008). Censos Nacionales 2007. XI de Población y VI de Vivienda. Resultados definitivos. Departamento de Apurímac. Lima: INEI

  • Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language, ideologies, polities and identities (pp. 35–84). New Mexico: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. In Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 79–104.

  • McCarty, T. (Ed.). (2010). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policy in schools: educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G. (2001). ¿Cómo pensar en público? Un debate pragmatista con el tutelaje castrense y clerical. In S. López Maguiña, G. Portocarrero, R. Silva Santistevan y, & V. Vich (Eds.), Estudios Culturales Discursos, poderes, pulsiones (pp. 121–143). Lima: Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. (2007). Language endangerment, language rights and indigeneity. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 111–134). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 60–76). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas. CLACSO: Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Bravo, P., & Neira, E. (2001). Enfrentados al patrón: una aproximación al estudio de las masculinidades en el medio rural peruano. In S. López Maguiña, G. Portocarrero, R. Silva Santistevan y, & V. Vich (Eds.), Estudios culturales. Discursos, poderes, pulsiones (pp. 211–231). Lima: Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In R. Guha & G. C. Spivak (Eds.), Selected subaltern studies (pp. 3–32). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1995). Waiting for the mouse: Constructed dialogue in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 198–217). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiviezo, L. (2009). Bilingual Intercultural Education in Indigenous schools: An ethnography of teacher interpretations of government policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. (2007). La autoridad lingüística del español y las ideologías de la autenticidad y el anonimato. In J. Del Valle (Ed.), La lengua, ¿patria común? (pp. 129–142). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Zavala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zavala, V. An ancestral language to speak with the “Other”: closing down ideological spaces of a language policy in the Peruvian Andes. Lang Policy 13, 1–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9297-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9297-4

Keywords

Navigation