Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Researching ‘practiced language policies’: insights from conversation analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In language policy research, ‘policy’ has traditionally been conceptualised as a notion separate from that of ‘practice’. In fact, language practices were usually analysed with a view to evaluate whether a policy is being implemented or resisted to. Recently, however, Spolsky in (Language policy. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 2004; Work Pap Educ Linguist 22(1):1–14, 2007; Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer, New York, 2008) has argued that policy and practice need not be seen as distinct and that there is a policy within language practices themselves. In this paper, I propose to call the policy found at the level of language practices a ‘practiced language policy’. The aim of this paper is to explore further this new conceptualisation of language policy and to propose an approach to research it. I argue that Conversation Analysis in its broad sense (that is, including Sequential Analysis and Membership Categorisation Analysis) can be an efficient tool to discover practiced language policies and give an illustration of this argument drawing on a case study of an induction classroom for newly-arrived immigrant children in France.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of code-switching. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 115–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina, F. (2010). A Conversation Analytic approach to practiced language policies: The example of an induction classroom for newly-arrived immigrant children in France. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

  • Bonacina, F. (Forthcoming). Ideologies and issues of access in multilingual school ethnography: A French example. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, Discourse and Ethnography (pp. 269–284). New York: Routledge.

  • Bonacina, F., & Gafaranga, J. (2011). ‘Medium of instruction’ vs. ‘medium of classroom interaction’: Language choice in a French complementary school classroom in Scotland. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, online preprint.

  • Fishman, J. A. (1979). Bilingual education, language planning and English. English World-Wide, 1(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A., Ferguson, C. A., & Das Guptas, J. (1968). Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gafaranga, J. (2001). Linguistic identities in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1901–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gafaranga, J. (2007). Code-switching as a conversational strategy. In P. W. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication (pp. 279–314). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Gafaranga, J. (2010). Medium request: Talking language shift into being. Language in Society, 39, 241–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1983). The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and Practice. In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives (pp. 269–289). Berlin: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hélot, C. (2003). Language policy and the ideology of bilingual education in France. Language Policy, 2, 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hélot, C., & Young, A. (2006). Imagining multilingual education in France: A language and cultural awareness project at primary level. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools (pp. 69–90). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Culture un action. Studies in membership categorisation analysis. Washington: University Press of America.

  • Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An Introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 24–41). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housley, W. (2000). Category Work and Knowledge ability within multidisciplinary team meetings. Text, 20, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, D. (2007). An Introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. W. (2005). ‘Safe’ language practices in two rural schools in Malaysia: Tensions between policy and practice. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 74–97). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A.W. (1978). The organisation of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7, 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, A. (2003). Language of the enemy: Foreign language education and national identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(5), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2006). Language policy: Theory and practice – An introduction. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An Introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 10–23). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972a). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972b). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2007). Towards a theory of language policy. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 22(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2008). Investigating language education policy. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 27–39). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B., & Shohamy, E. (2000). Language practice, language ideology, and language policy. In Lambert, R. D., & Shohamy, E. (Eds.), Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in Honour of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vila i Moreno, X. F. (2008). Language-in-education policies in the Catalan language area. AILA Review, 21, 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., & Martin, P. (2009). Conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching: An introduction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. F. (2008). Language and Interaction: An advanced resource book. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence Bonacina-Pugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonacina-Pugh, F. Researching ‘practiced language policies’: insights from conversation analysis. Lang Policy 11, 213–234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9243-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9243-x

Keywords

Navigation