Skip to main content
Log in

Pure quotation and general compositionality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Starting from the familiar observation that no straightforward treatment of pure quotation can be compositional in the standard (homomorphism) sense, we introduce general compositionality, which can be described as compositionality that takes linguistic context into account. A formal notion of linguistic context type is developed, allowing the context type of a complex expression to be distinct from those of its constituents. We formulate natural conditions under which an ordinary meaning assignment can be non-trivially extended to one that is sensitive to context types and satisfies general compositionality. As our main example we work out a Fregean treatment of pure quotation, but we also indicate that the method applies to other kinds of context, e.g. intensional contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker C., Jacobson P. (2007) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen H., LePore E. (2007) Language turned on itself. The semantics and pragmatics of metalinguistic discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H., & LePore, E. (2008). Quotation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Winter 2008.

  • Clark H., Gerrig R. (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4): 764–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1979). Quotation. Theory and Decision, 11, 27–40. (Reprinted in Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Clarendon Press).

  • Dowty D. (2007) Compositionality as an empirical problem. In: Barker C., Jacobson P. (eds) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1892). Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell; 1952.

  • Frege, G. (1902). Letter to Russell 28.12 1902. In G. Gabriel (Ed.), Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel (pp. 234–237). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag; 1976.

  • Geach P. (1957) Mental acts. Routledge Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glüer K., Pagin P. (2006) Proper names and relational modality. Linguistics & Philosophy 29: 507–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glüer K., Pagin P. (2008) Relational modality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17: 307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glüer, K., & Pagin, P. (2011). General terms and relational modality. Nous (forthcoming).

  • Hodges W. (2001) Formal features of compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D. (1989) Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 481–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics & Philosophy 30: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger & S. Öhman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagin P. (2005) Compositionality and context. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 303–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagin, P. (2010). General compositionality and belief sentences. Talk given at SPE 3, Paris, May 2010.

  • Pagin, P. (unpublished). Compositionality, computability, and complexity. Manuscript, unpublished.

  • Pagin, P. (to appear). Communication and the complexity of semantics. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pagin P., Westerståhl D. (2010a) Compositionality I: Definitions and variants. Philosophy Compass 5(3): 250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagin P., Westerståhl D. (2010b) Compositionality II: Arguments and problems. Philosophy Compass 5(3): 265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T. (1982) What do quotation marks name? Frege’s theory of quotations and that clauses. Philosophical Studies 42(3): 315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. (1984). Compositionality. In F. Landman & F. Veltman (Eds.), Varieties of formal semantics (pp. 281–311). Dordrecht: Foris. (Reprinted in Partee, B. H. (2004). Compositionality in formal semantics (pp. 153–181). Oxford: Blackwell).

  • Potts C. (2007) The dimensions of quotation. In: Barker C., Jacobson P. (eds) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 405–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Predelli S. (2008) The demonstrative theory of quotation. Linguistics & Philosophy 31(5): 555–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. (1940) Mathematical logic. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (2001) Open quotation. Mind, 110: 637–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (2008) Open quotation revisited. Philosophical Perspectives 22: 443–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (to appear). Compositionality, flexibility and context-dependence. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Saka P. (1998) Quotation and the use-mention distinction. Mind 107: 113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle J. (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, C.-c. (2011). The character of quotation. Linguistics and Philosophy (this volume).

  • Tarski A. (1952) The semantic conception of truth. In: Linsky L. (ed.) Semantics and the philosophy of language. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 13–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1983). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In Logic, semantics, metamathematics (2nd ed., pp. 152–278). Indianapolis: Hackett; 1983.

  • Washington C. (1992) The identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 89: 582–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werning, M. (2005). Right and wrong reasons for compositionality. In E. Machery, M. Werning, & G. Schurz (Eds.), The compositionality of meaning and content: Foundational issues (Vol. I, pp. 285–309). Frankfurt: Ontos.

  • Westerståhl D. (1998) On mathematical proofs of the vacuity of compositionality. Linguistics & Philosophy 21: 635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl D. (2002) On the compositionality of idioms; an abstract approach. In: Barker-Plummer D. et al (eds) Words, proofs, and diagrams. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 241–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl D. (2004) On the compositional extension problem. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33: 549–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, D. (to appear). Compositionality in Kaplan style semantics. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Westerståhl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagin, P., Westerståhl, D. Pure quotation and general compositionality. Linguist and Philos 33, 381–415 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9083-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9083-8

Keywords

Navigation