Skip to main content
Log in

The \(k\)-sample problem in a multi-state model and testing transition probability matrices

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of multi-state models is natural in analysis of survival data, e.g., when the subjects in a study pass through different states like ‘healthy’, ‘in a state of remission’, ‘relapse’ or ‘dead’ in a health related quality of life study. Competing risks is another common instance of the use of multi-state models. Statistical inference for such event history data can be carried out by assuming a stochastic process model. Under such a setting, comparison of the event history data generated by two different treatments calls for testing equality of the corresponding transition probability matrices. The present paper proposes solution to this class of problems by assuming a non-homogeneous Markov process to describe the transitions among the health states. A class of test statistics are derived for comparison of \(k\) treatments by using a ‘weight process’. This class, in particular, yields generalisations of the log-rank, Gehan, Peto–Peto and Harrington–Fleming tests. For an intrinsic comparison of the treatments, the ‘leave-one-out’ jackknife method is employed for identifying influential observations. The proposed methods are then used to develop the Kolmogorov–Smirnov type supremum tests corresponding to the various extended tests. To demonstrate the usefulness of the test procedures developed, a simulation study was carried out and an application to the Trial V data provided by International Breast Cancer Study Group is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen O (1978) Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Ann Stat 6(4):701–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalen OO, Borgan O, Gjessing HK (2008) Survival and event history analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Keiding N (2002) Multi-state models for event history analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 11:91–115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP (2004) Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations. Lifetime Data Anal 10:335–350

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Klein JP, Rosthoj S (2003) Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models. Biometrika 90:15–27

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andrei A-C, Murray SA (2007) Regression models for the mean of the quality-of-life-adjusted restricted survival time using pseudo-observations. Biometrics 63:398–404

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Allignol A, Schumacher M, Beyersmann J, (2011) Empirical transition matrix of multi-state models: the etm package. J Stat Softw 38(4):1–15. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v38/i04/

  • Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52:203–223

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington DP, Fleming TR (1982) A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika 69:133–143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huzurbazar A (2005) Flowgraph models for multistate time-to-event data. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Lawless JF (1985) The analysis of panel data under a Markov assumption. J Am Stat Assoc 80:863–868

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulathinal S, Gasbarra D (2002) Testing equality of cause-specific hazard rates corresponding to m competing risks among K groups. Lifetime Data Anal 8:147–161

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto R, Peto J (1972) Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion). J R Stat Soc A 135:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Tarone R, Ware J (1977) On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika 64:156–160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tattar PN, Vaman HJ (2008) Testing transition probability matrix of a multi-state model with censored data. Lifetime Data Anal 14(2):216–230

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tattar PN, Vaman HJ (2012) Extension of the Harrington–Fleming tests to multistate models. Sankhya B 74:1–14

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Titman AC, Sharples LD (2010) Model diagnostics for multi-state models. Stat Methods Med Res 19:621–651

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Tsiatis AA (2000) Estimating mean quality adjusted lifetime with censored data. Sankhya B 62:175–188

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Tsiatis AA (2001) Testing equality of survival functions of quality-adjusted lifetime. Biometrics 57:861–867

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the two referees and an Associate Editor for their valuable remarks that have resulted in the present vastly improved version of the paper. Thanks are due to Prof. Bernard Cole, Harvard School of Public Health, and the International Breast Cancer Study Group, Boston, for providing the Trial V data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabhanjan N. Tattar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tattar, P.N., Vaman, H.J. The \(k\)-sample problem in a multi-state model and testing transition probability matrices. Lifetime Data Anal 20, 387–403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-013-9267-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-013-9267-3

Keywords

Navigation