Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for checking the Markov condition in multi-state survival data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inference in multi-state models is traditionally performed under a Markov assumption that claims that past and future of the process are independent given the present state. This assumption has an important role in the estimation of the transition probabilities. When the multi-state model is Markovian, the Aalen–Johansen estimator gives consistent estimators of the transition probabilities but this is no longer the case when the process is non-Markovian. Usually, this assumption is checked including covariates depending on the history. Since the landmark methods of the transition probabilities are free of the Markov assumption, they can also be used to introduce such tests by measuring their discrepancy to Markovian estimators. In this paper, we introduce tests for the Markov assumption and compare them with the usual approach based on the analysis of covariates depending on history through simulations. The methods are also compared with more recent and competitive approaches. Three real data examples are included for illustration of the proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen O, Johansen S (1978) An empirical transition matrix for non homogeneous Markov and chains based on censored observations. Scand J Stat 5:141–150

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Gerds T, Latouche A (2014) A competing risks approach for nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in a non-Markov illness-death model. Lifetime Data Anal 20:495–513

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Keiding N (2002) Multi-state models for event history analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 11:91–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PK, Esbjerg S, Sorensen TIA (2000) Multistate models for bleeding episodes and mortality in liver cirrhosis. Stat Med 19:587–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyersmann J, Schumacher M, Allignol A (2012) Competing risks and multistate models with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borgan O (2005) Encyclopedia of biostatistics: Aalen–Johansen estimator. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou SH, Qian J, Mormino E, Betensky RA (2018) Permutation tests for general dependent truncation. Comput Stat Data Anal 128:308–324

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–200

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Datta S, Satten GA (2001) Validity of the Aalen–Johansen estimators of stage occupation probabilities and Nelson–Aalen estimators of integrated transition hazards for non-Markov models. Stat Probab Lett 55:403–411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de Uña-Álvarez J, Meira-Machado L (2015) Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: a comparative study. Biometrics 71:364–375

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Genser B, Wernecke KD (2005) Joint modelling of repeated transitions in follow-up data—a case study on breast cancer data. Biom J 47(3):388–401

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kay R (1986) A Markov model for analyzing cancer markers and disease states in survival studies. Biometrics 42:457–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Meira-Machado L (2016) Smoothed landmark estimators of the transition probabilities. SORT-Stat Oper Res Trans 40:375–398

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meira-Machado L, Sestelo M (2019) Estimation in the progressive illness-death model: a nonexhaustive review. Biom J 61(2):245–263

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meira-Machado L, de Uña-Álvarez J, Cadarso-Suárez C (2006) Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in a non-Markov illness-death model. Lifetime Data Anal 12:325–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meira-Machado L, de Uña-Álvarez J, Cadarso-Suárez C, Andersen PK (2009) Multi-state models for the analysis of time-to-event data. Stat Methods Med Res 18:195–222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Laurie JA, Tangen CM, Ungerleider JS, Emerson WA, Tormey DC, Glick JH, Veeder MH, Mailliard JA (1995) Fluorouracil plus levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage III colon carcinoma: a Final Report. Ann Intern Med 122(5):321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Ocón R, Ruiz-Castro JE, Gámiz-Pérez ML (2001) Non-homogeneous Markov models in the analysis of survival after breast cancer. J R Stat Soc Ser C 50(1):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putter H, Spitoni C (2018) Non-parametric estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models: the landmark Aalen–Johansen estimator. Stat Methods Med Res 27(7):2081–2092

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB (2007) Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 26:2389–2430

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Girondo M, de Uña-Álvarez J (2012) A nonparametric test for Markovianity in the illness-death model. Stat Med 31(30):4416–4427

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Girondo M, de Uña-Álvarez J (2016) Methods for testing the Markov condition in the illness-death model: a comparative study. Stat Med 35(20):3549–3562

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerbrei W, Royston P (1999) Building multivariable prognostic and diagnostic models: transformation of the predictors by using fractional polynomials. J R Stat Soc Ser A 161(1):71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman AC (2015) Transition probability estimates for non-Markov multi-state models. Biometrics 71:1034–1041

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Titman AC, Putter H (2020) General tests of the Markov property in multi-state models. Bio-statistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houwelingen HC (2007) Dynamic prediction by landmarking in event history analysis. Scand J Stat 34(1):70–85

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financed by Portuguese Funds through FCT—“Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia”, within the research Grants PTDC/MAT-STA/28248/2017 and PD/BD/142887/2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Soutinho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soutinho, G., Meira-Machado, L. Methods for checking the Markov condition in multi-state survival data. Comput Stat 37, 751–780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01139-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01139-7

Keywords

Navigation