Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of technology in the design of learning environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of learning environments is being increasingly investigated, largely as a result of higher-education providers being challenged by both societal and technological developments. These providers are becoming more aware that the quality of learning environments affects students’ approaches to learning and satisfaction. This paper presents an alternative to more-traditional methods for designing learning environments that is driven by input of their main stakeholders: students and teachers. By using this method, we were able to explore stakeholders’ insights into learning spaces design and how learning technologies can be integrated in such spaces. Qualitative research was conducted with the aim of guiding the redesign of technology-enhanced learning environments. For this particular research, we used ‘sandpits’, which are creative and design-thinking workshops, in which participants are encouraged to redesign provocative concepts of a large and a small technology-enhanced learning environment. Thirteen ‘sandpits’ were delivered involving 32 teachers and 25 students. Through these design-thinking workshops, students and teachers reflected on and discussed the role of technology in face-to-face learning and teaching and proposed new design solutions for technology-enhanced learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiyegbayo, O. (2015). How and why academics do and do not use iPads for academic teaching? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1324–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78(3), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R. J. (2014). History and evolution of active learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Allain, R. J., Deardorff, D. L., & Abbott, D. S. (2000). Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-centered activities for large enrollment university physics. Charlotte. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED459062

  • Bligh, B. (2014). Examining new processes for learning space design. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education (pp. 34–57). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices: Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsignore, E., Ahn, J., Clegg, T., Guha, M. L., Yip, J. C., & Discussant, A. D. (2013). Embedding participatory design into designs for learning: An untapped interdisciplinary resource? In Computer-supported cooperative learning conference (CSCL 2013). University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, D., Di Napoli, R., & Leijon, M. (2018). Which space? Whose space? An experience in involving students and teachers in space design. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerratto-Pargman, T., Järvelä, S. M., & Milrad, M. (2012). Designing Nordic technology-enhanced learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, V., & Wilson, N. (2019). More than chalkboards: Classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, B. (2013). Sketch-ins: A method for participatory design in technology-enhanced learning. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 92–101). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C., & Mitchell, G. (2012). Ambience in social learning: Student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education—A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B. J. (2013). Designing usable interventions: Bringing student perspectives to the table. Instructional Science, 42(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9298-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenberger, C., Good, J., & Keay-Bright, W. (2011). Designing technology for children with special needs: Bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign, 7(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.587013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, D. M., Lim, C. S. C., & Ahmed, A. (2014). Keep, lose, change: Prompts for the re-design of product concepts in a focus group setting. CoDesign, 10(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2013.862280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K. E., Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2006). Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education. Business Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 374–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P., Fisher, K., Gilding, T., Taylor, P. G., & Trevitt, A. C. F. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? European Journal of Education, 52(3), 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., Gubby, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Space frontiers for new pedagogies: A tale of constraints and possibilities. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.503270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee). (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning. Bristol: Author. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/learningspaces.pdf

  • Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9305-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä, T., & Helfenstein, S. (2016). Developing a conceptual framework for participatory design of psychosocial and physical learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei, B., & May, L. (2018). Reflective renovation: Insights from a collaborative and active learning space project evaluation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(6), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. J. (2007). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In A. Sears, J. A. Jacko, & J. A. Jackov (Eds.), The Human-computer interaction handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1070–1077). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. L., & Choi, B. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunath, R., Anker, C., & Nortcliffe, A. (2018). Are academics ready for smart learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, I. M. (2013). Key challenges associated with bringing personal mobile devices to the classroom. In QScience proceedings (12th World conference on mobile and contextual learning [mLearn 2013), 16.

  • Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., & Boh Podgornik, B. (2017). Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: an under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., McKenney, S., Cullinan, D., & Heuer, J. (2017). Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Note Chism, N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. Washington DC: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck, M., Greenaway, R., Kennedy-Behr, A., & Askew, E. (2019). Student experiences of learning in a technology-enabled learning space. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 270–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1202–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Paul Michel for his design interpretation of the new learning environments in Figs. 5 and 6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ExPERT Academy, University of West London, St Mary’s Road, London, W5 5RF, UK

    Diogo Casanova & Isabel Huet

  2. Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, AM, Manaus, 69067-005, Brasil

    Fabiane Garcia

  3. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Teresa Pessoa

Authors
  1. Diogo Casanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabel Huet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabiane Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teresa Pessoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Casanova.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casanova, D., Huet, I., Garcia, F. et al. Role of technology in the design of learning environments. Learning Environ Res 23, 413–427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09314-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09314-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation