Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Space matters: framing the New Zealand learning landscape

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant funding is devoted across the world to transforming traditional classrooms into flexible learning environments. These efforts are often motivated by a desire to create learning spaces attuned to twenty-first century competencies, which involve learning how to communicate, collaborate, think creatively, and how to become critical users of technologies engaged in both the consumption and production of knowledge. In New Zealand, these flexible learning spaces are seen as part of innovative learning environments (ILEs), which are conceptualised as ecosystems involving learners, educators, communities, pedagogical practices, knowledge, and digital and material resources, including buildings and furniture. In line with ILEs, the notion of place-based spaces for networked learning foregrounds learning activity as enmeshed in an assemblage of elements—involving physical spaces, artefacts, digital technologies, people, ideas and tasks. In this paper, we adopt a networked learning perspective to frame the New Zealand learning landscape. Key findings from a national survey with 222 primary teachers, 126 secondary teachers and 163 school leaders, show that most teachers and leaders perceived their schools as being in-transition to ILEs. Findings highlight the importance of having a shared vision and leadership dedicated to supporting teachers’ experimentation with new practices in innovative spaces. The survey details the digital and material resources, the social configurations used in classrooms, the types of learning tasks students are engaging in and a range of emergent practices in innovative and traditional environments for learning across New Zealand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., et al. (2019). EDUCAUSE horizon report: 2019 higher (Education ed.). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benade, L. (2017). The evolution of policy: A critical examination of school property under the National-led Government. Waikato Journal of Education, 22(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardellino, P., Araneda, C., & Alvarado, R. G. (2017). Classroom environments: An experiential analysis of the pupil-teacher visual interaction in Uruguay. Learning Environments Research, 20, 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., Goodyear, P., & de Laat, M. (Eds.). (2017). Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design, and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H., Tse, H. M., Stables, A., & Cox, S. (2018). Design as a social practice: The experience of newbuild schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(2), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damşa, C., Nerland, M., & Andreadakis, Z. (2019). An ecological perspective on learner-constructed learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Counts. (2019). New Zealand Schools. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/data-services/directories/list-of-nz-schools.

  • ERO. (2018). Leading Innovative Learning in New Zealand Schools. Education Review Office. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from https://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/leading-innovative-learning-in-new-zealand-schools-april-2018/.

  • Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2017 K–12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 48–70). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, N. (2009). Mapping school design: A qualitative study of the relations among facilities design, curriculum delivery, and school climate. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(4), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imms, W., Mahat, M., Byers, T., & Murphy, D. (2017). Type and use of innovative learning environments in Australasian schools (ILETC Survey No. 1). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, LEaRN. Retrieved April 7, 2019 https://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports.

  • McGregor, J. (2003). Making spaces: Teacher workplace topologies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(3), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOE. (2015). Designing schools in New Zealand: Requirements and Guidelines. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://education.govt.nz/.

  • Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 3(4), 575–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordquist, J., & Laing, A. (2015). Designing spaces for the networked learning landscape. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015a). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/education/schooling-redesigned-9789264245914-en.htm.

  • OECD. (2015b). Students, computers and learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Learning environments evaluation program. Retrieved April 3, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/education/LEEP_Brochure_OECD.pdf.

  • OECD. (2018). The OECD school user survey: Improving learning spaces together. Retrieved April 6, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/education/effective-learning-environments/.

  • OECD. (2019). Effective learning environments (ELE). Retrieved April 3, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/education/effective-learning-environments/.

  • Radcliffe, D. (2009). A pedagogy–space–technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, H. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Designing next generation spaces of learning: Collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2009). The future of learning in the age of innovation: Review for the Beyond Current Horizons Programme. Bristol: Futurelab. Retrieved November 4, 2019, from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.504.541&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Sissons, T. (2018). Modern learning environments—Are they all they’re cracked up to be? New Zealand Herald. Retrieved May 12, 2019, from https://educationcentral.co.nz/opinion-modern-learning-environments-are-they-all-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/.

  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TKI. (2019). Innovative learning environments. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved May 14, 2019, from https://elearning.tki.org.nz/Teaching/Innovative-learning-environments.

  • Vartiainen, H., Nissinen, S., Pöllänen, S., & Vanninen, P. (2018). Teachers’ insights into connected learning networks: Emerging activities and forms of participation. AERA Open.. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418799694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, G. (2016). The impact of physical design on student outcomes. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved May 12, 2019, from https://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz.

  • Wilson, H. (2009). The process of creating learning space. In D. Radclife, H. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Designing next generation spaces of learning: Collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (2019). Built policy: School-building and architecture as policy instrument. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1578901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning spaces. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucila Carvalho.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, L., Nicholson, T., Yeoman, P. et al. Space matters: framing the New Zealand learning landscape. Learning Environ Res 23, 307–329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4

Keywords

Navigation