Abstract
Teacher–student interactions contribute to the quality of the classroom environment. Although numerous measures of these interactions exist, few target the affective expression and reception of interactions directly. To fill this need, we detail the piloting and psychometric validation a self-report measure, the Emotion-Focused Interactions (EFI) Scale. The EFI is reliable as a one-factor measure, with strong positive loadings and adequate internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis rendered the EFI valid, test–retest reliability was adequate, and concurrent validity was significant. Results suggest the EFI has good psychometric properties as a measure of affective exchanges among teachers and students. Implications for use and further study are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Enhancing academic performance and social and emotional competence with the RULER feeling words curriculum. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 218–224.
Breeman, L. D., Wubbels, T., Van Lier, P. A. C., Verhulst, F. C., van der Ende, J., Maras, A., et al. (2015). Teacher characteristics, social classroom relationships, and children’s social, emotional, and behavioral classroom adjustment in special education. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.11.005.
Catalano, R. F., Berglund, L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczek, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260102.
Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Toward an ecological/transactional model of community violence and child maltreatment: Consequences for children’s development. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 56, 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1993.11024624.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., & Zinsser, K. (2012). Early childhood teachers as socializers of young children’s emotional competence. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0504-2.
Developmental Studies Center. (2000). Student Questionnaire, Child Development Project (Elementary School Version). Oakland, CA: Author. Retrieved from www.devstu.org.
Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system—secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614537117.
Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85, 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12184.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instruction and emotional support in the first grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x.
Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student–teacher relationships. In G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–72). Bethedsa, MD: NASP.
Howes, C. (2000). Social-emotional classroom climate in child care, child–teacher relationships and children’s second grade peer relations. Social Development, 9, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00119.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2013). LISREL 9.10. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2015). LISREL 9.20 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.
McCormick, M. P., O’Connor, E. E., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. G. (2013). Teacher–child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001.
Paris, S. (1993). Four perspectives on educational assessment. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655920390202.
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. J. (2008a). Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 365–397. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308230.
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008b). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) Manual, Pre-K. Baltimore, MA: Brookes.
Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher–child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519.
Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579403000075.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712.
Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Salovey, P. (2013a). The Emotion-Focused Interactions Scale. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2013b). Improving the social and emotional climate of classrooms: A clustered randomized controlled trial testing—The RULER approach. Prevention Science, 14(1), 77–87.
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., & Mannes, M. (2006). The contribution to adolescent well-being made by nonfamily adults: An examination of developmental assets as contexts and processes. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20106.
Snyder, S., & Sheehan, R. (1992). The Rasch measurement model: An introduction. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519201600108.
Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Terry, M. N., Clary, M., & Elzinga, N. (2015). Students’ ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well-being. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000106.
Wang, M. T., Brinkworth, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). Moderating effects of teacher–student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49, 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916.
Widaman, K. F. (2006). Missing data: What to do with or without them. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2006.00404.x.
Woolley, M., Kol, K., & Bowen, G. (2009). The social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324478.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cipriano, C., Barnes, T.N., Kolev, L. et al. Validating the Emotion-Focused Interactions Scale for teacher–student interactions. Learning Environ Res 22, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9264-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9264-2