Abstract
In this study, the concept of ‘community of learners’ was used to improve initial vocational education. The framework of a ‘community of learners for vocational orientation’ that we present offers both a theoretical understanding of teaching–learning processes in initial vocational education and heuristics for the design of innovative learning environments for optimising these processes. In a design research study, we investigated if, and how, learning environments designed on the basis of these heuristics fostered communities of learners for vocational orientation, in which students experience to learn in a shared, meaningful, reflective and transfer-oriented way. We examined students’ perceptions of the learning environment and their learning activities during eight curriculum units specifically designed to foster the communities of learners. During almost all of the units that we designed, students found themselves learning in a more shared, meaningful, reflective and transfer-oriented way than during regular units. We conclude that the proposed heuristics had been useful starting points for the design of innovative learning environments that foster communities of learners for vocational orientation. In addition, we show how the heuristics can be elaborated for a particular school, based on practical and pedagogical content knowledge of teachers, as well as students’ perceptions of the learning environment and their learning activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5, 153–173.
Angelides, P. (2001). The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analysing qualitative data: The analysis of critical incidents. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(30), 429–442.
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 46–69.
Beishuizen, J. (2008). Does a community of learners foster self-regulated learning? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 183–193.
Bell, L. M., & Aldridge, J. M. (2014). Investigating the use of student perception data for teacher reflection and classroom improvement. Learning Environments Research, 17, 371–388.
Boersma, A., Krol, K., Ten Dam, D., Wardekker, N., & Volman, M. (2013). A design research study on communities of learners for students in pre-vocational secondary schools. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational research design: Introduction and illustrative cases (pp. 449–467). Enschede: SLO.
Boersma, A., Ten Dam, G., Volman, M., & Wardekker, W. (2010). ‘This baby… it isn’t alive’. Towards a community of learners for vocational orientation. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 3–25.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice: Classroom lessons (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 211–217.
Campione, J. C., Shapiro, A. M., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Forms of transfer in a community of learners: Flexible learning and understanding. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer. Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 35–68). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Edwards, A. (2005). Let’s get beyond community and practice: The many meanings of learning by participating. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 49–65.
Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498.
Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). London: Routledge.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). Dordrecht: Springer.
Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56–73.
Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.
Hager, P. (2004). The conceptualization and measurement of learning at work. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 242–258). London: Routledge.
Hogarth, T., de Hoyos, M., Gambin, L., Wilson, R. A., & Brown, A. (2008). Initial vocational education and training (IVET) in Europe: Review. Thessaloniki: Cedefop.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 95–105.
Koopman, M., Teune, P., & Beijaard, D. (2011). Development of student knowledge in competence-based pre-vocational secondary education. Learning Environments Research, 14, 205–227.
Kuijpers, M., Meijers, F., & Gundy, C. (2011). The relationship between learning environment and career competencies of students in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 78(1), 21–30.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leontev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Neuvel, J., & Van Esch, W. (2010). Van vmbo naar mbo: doorstroom en loopbaankeuzes [From pvse to ssve: continuation and career choices]. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: Ecbo.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research. An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research: Introduction and illustrative cases (pp. 10–51). Enschede: SLO.
Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (2010). Rediscovering apprenticeship: Research findings of the international network on innovative apprenticeship (INAP). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rogoff, B., Goodman Turkanis, C., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2000). Learning environments research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in practice. Learning Environments Research, 2, 225–247.
Sapir, A., Aghion, P., Bertola, G., Hellwig, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Rosati, D., et al. (2004). An agenda for a growing Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sappa, V., & Aprea, C. (2014). Conceptions of connectivity: How Swiss teachers, trainers and apprentices perceive vocational learning and teaching across different learning sites. Vocations and Learning, 7, 263–287.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140.
Stefanou, C. R., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2002). Developing motivation and cognitive learning strategies through an undergraduate learning community. Learning Environments Research, 5, 77–97.
Stenström, M.-L., & Tynjälä, P. (2009). Towards integration of work and learning. New York: Springer.
Tomcho, T. J., & Foels, R. (2012). Meta-analysis of group learning activities: Empirically based teaching recommendations. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 159–169.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Tynjälä, P. (2009). Connectivity and transformation in work-related learning—Theoretical foundations. In M. L. Stenström & P. Tynjälä (Eds.), Towards integration of work and learning: Strategies for connectivity and transformation (pp. 11–38). Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Oers, B. (1996). The dynamics of school learning. In J. Valsiner & H.-G. Voss (Eds.), The structure of learning processes (pp. 205–229). New York: Ablex.
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.
Van Oers, B. (2010). Children’s enculturation through play. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 195–209). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
Van Schaik, M., Van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2010). Learning in the school workplace: Knowledge acquisition and modelling in preparatory vocational secondary education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(2), 163–181.
Van Schaik, M., Van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2011). Towards a knowledge-rich learning environment in preparatory secondary education. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 61–81.
Wardekker, W. L. (1998). Scientific concepts and reflection. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(2), 143–153.
Wardekker, W., Boersma, A., Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2012). Motivation for school learning: Enhancing the meaningfulness of learning in communities of learners. In M. Hedegaard, A. Edwards, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Motives in children’s development: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 153–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boersma, A., ten Dam, G., Wardekker, W. et al. Designing innovative learning environments to foster communities of learners for students in initial vocational education. Learning Environ Res 19, 107–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9203-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9203-4