Abstract
Recently, Qatar established educational reform in charter (independent) schools focusing on curriculum standards, student-centred teaching, standards-based assessment, English as the language of instruction, and extensive professional development. A primary area of emphasis was the creation of student-centred mathematics and science classrooms characterised by inquiry and active student participation. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the learning environments of Qatari mathematics and science classrooms at two levels: in higher- and lower-performing Qatari schools implementing the recent Education for a New Era reform elements; and in classes of teachers who experienced professional development focused on student-centred teaching strategies and those who did not. Participants included teachers and students in 47 grade 3 and 4 mathematics and science classrooms. Classroom observations were conducted and student learning environment surveys were administered at the beginning and end of the semester. Results indicated low levels of student-centred instruction, despite significant improvement over time. Few differences by level of school performance or professional development participation existed. However, Personalisation emerged as a key learning environment variable related to teachers’ implementation of student-centred instruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, K. (2011). Casting Arabic culture as the “other”: Cultural issues in the English curriculum. In C. Gitsaki (Ed.), Teaching and learning in the Arab world (pp. 119–138). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-national study of classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134.
Blumenfeld, P., Kempler, T., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where are we today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brewer, D., Augustine, C., Zellman, G., Ryan, G., Goldman, C., Stasz, C., et al. (2007). Education for a new era: Design and implementation of K-12 education reform in Qatar. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
Calderhead, J. (2001). International experiences of teaching reform. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 777–800). Washington, DC: AERA.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press.
Education Institute. (2002). National curriculum standards. Doha: State of Qatar Supreme Education Council.
Education Institute. (2007). National professional standards for teachers and school leaders. Doha: State of Qatar Supreme Education Council.
Engle, R., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
Fouts, J., Brown, C., & Theiman, G. (2002). Classroom instruction in Gates schools: A baseline report. Seattle, WA: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects, and determinants. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (1999). Using learning environment assessments to improve classroom and school climates. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving, and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 65–83). London: Falmer.
Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environment. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.
Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1991). Development and validation of short forms of some instruments measuring student perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Science Education, 67, 115–131.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences. London: Pergamon.
Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
Glazer, E., & Hannafin, M. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179–193.
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2000). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Longman.
Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grossman, P. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 425–476). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 125–150). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Haydar, H. N. (2005). Teachers learning of and from practice in a standards-based reform: The case of Qatar. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Education.
Hourani, R., Diallo, I., & Said, A. (2011). Teaching in the Arabian Gulf: Arguments for the deconstruction of the current educational model. In C. Gitsaki (Ed.), Teaching and learning in the Arab world (pp. 335–356). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Jadullah, N., & Pounder, D. (2009). Middle school reform and its relationship to learning environments and student outcomes. In W. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Studies in school improvement (pp. 95–136). Charlotte, NC: Information age.
Knight, S., Ikhlef, A., Parker, D., Joshi, R. M., Eslami, Z., Al-Ahraf, M., et al. (2011). Investigation of math and science teaching and learning in Qatari independent elementary schools. In C. Gitsaki (Ed.), Teaching and learning in the Arab world (pp. 249–274). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Koul, R., & Fisher, D. L. (2005). Cultural background and students’ perceptions of science classroom learning environment and teacher interpersonal behaviours in Jammu, India. Learning Environments Research Journal, 8, 195–211.
Lens, W., & Vabsteenkiste, M. (2008). Promoting self-regulated learning: A motivational analysis. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 141–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McNiff, J. (2010). Supporting teachers personally and professionally in challenging environments. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 1–15.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-centered teaching meets new media: Concept and case study. Educational Technology and Society, 5(4), 160–172.
Nasser, R., & Romanowski, M. (2011). Teacher perceptions of professional development in the context of national educational reform: The case of Qatar. International Journal of Training Development, 15, 158–168.
Nix, R., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research Journal, 8, 109–133.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 223–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sawyer, K. (2006). Conclusion: The schools of the future. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 567–580). New York: Cambridge.
Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shah, I., & Baporikar, N. (2011). The suitability of imported curricula for learning in the Gulf states: An Oman perspective. In C. Gitsaki (Ed.), Teaching and learning in the Arab world (pp. 275–292). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Spinner, H., & Fraser, B. (2005). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 267–293.
Stuart, A. (1997). Student centered learning. Learning, 26, 53–56.
Supreme Education Council Evaluation Institute. (2010). Schools and schooling in Qatar 2008–09 report. Doha: Supreme Education Council.
Zedan, R. (2010). New dimensions in the classroom climate. Learning Environments Research, 13, 75–88.
Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a grant from the Qatar National Research Foundation, National Priorities Research Program, Grant #13-6-7-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knight, S.L., Parker, D., Zimmerman, W. et al. Relationship between perceived and observed student-centred learning environments in Qatari elementary mathematics and science classrooms. Learning Environ Res 17, 29–47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9156-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9156-z