Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing technical expertise in secondary technical schools: The effect of 4C/ID learning environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effectiveness of learning environments, developed in line with the specifications of the four components instructional design model (4C/ID model) and the additional effect of ICT for fostering the development of technical expertise in traditional Ghanaian classrooms, was assessed. The study had a one-by-one-by-two pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design. Three functionally equivalent classes of students from three similar (secondary technical) schools were randomly exposed to three different treatments. The sample consisted of 129 students. The treatment groups consisted of one control group with a regular method of teaching and two experimental groups: a 4C/ID learning environment with ICT; and a 4C/ID learning environment without ICT. The content for the treatments was selected from the secondary technical education syllabus. Technical teachers were trained to implement the interventions. After the pilot study, the materials were validated by experts and revised. Teachers were retrained. The main study, consisting of six sessions, was conducted in regular classrooms in three schools. Results indicated that a 4C/ID learning environment promotes the development of technical expertise in secondary technical education better than teaching designed in line with a regular method of teaching. Moreover, results reveal no significant difference in learning gains for the 4C/ID learning environment between the group with ICT and the group without ICT. In the final section, the theoretical, research and practical implications of the results for the instructional design and technology community as well as for educational practice, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, F. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anamoah-Mensah, J. (1998, May). Science education as a tool for national development: The missing framework. Paper presented at Eastern Washington University, Washington, DC.

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casakin, H. (2004). Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process. Expert versus novice performance. The Journal of Design Research. Retrieved August 12, 2007, from http://www.research.it.uts.edu.au/creative/design/papers/22CasakinDTRS6.pdf.

  • Case, R. (1984). The processing of stage transition: A neo-Piagetian view. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 20–44). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (2001). What is next in the media and methods debate? In R. E. Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Argument, analysis, and evidence (pp. 327–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E., & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 464–478). New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R., Bowe, R., Harris, D., Loveys, M., Moore, R., Shilling et al. (1990). The TVEI story: Policy, practice and preparation for the workforce. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

  • De Corte, E. (1990). Towards powerful learning environments for the acquisition of problem-solving skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E. (2003). Designing learning environments that foster the productive use of acquired knowledge and skills. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 21–35). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Croock, M. B. M. (1999). The transfer paradox: Training design for troubleshooting skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

  • de Croock, M. B. M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). High vs. low contextual interference in simulated-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behaviour, 14, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foshay, W. R., Silber, K. A., & Stelnicki, B. (2003). Writing training materials that work. Jossey-Bass, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehalt, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, R. (2002). Principles of construction (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogveld, A. W. M., Paas, F., Jochems, W. M. G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Exploring teachers’ instructional design practices from a systems perspective. Instructional Science, 30, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Towards a constructivist view of instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(9), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Hannum, W. H., & Tessmer, M. (1989). Handbook of task analysis procedures. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004a). Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2/6), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004b). Just in time presentation of different types of information in learning statistics. Instructional Science, 32, 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Powerful learning environment and combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 645–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. White Plains, NY: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, E. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environment. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 35–54). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindekens, J., Heylighen, A., & Neuckermans, H. (2003). Understanding architectural redesign. In G. Aouad & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment, ESAI (pp. 671–681). Salford, UK: University of Salford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2006). Hypothesized performance on complex tasks as a function of scaled instructional strategies. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skills in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. G. W. C. (1993). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

  • Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, J. M, Limbach, R., & de Jong, T. (2003). Information support in designing powerful learning environment. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 89–106). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Committee on Review of Education Reforms in Ghana. (2002). Meeting the challenges of education in the twenty first century. Accra, Ghana: Adwinsa Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997a). Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 25–37). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997b). The use of telecommunication in education. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Solving instructional design problems, instructional design: International perspective (Vol. 2, pp. 183–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Ralleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, D. F., & Klein, J. D. (1988). A comparison of a microcomputer progressive state or drill and flashcards for learning paired association. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(4), 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, D. F., Richards, F. B., & Klein, D. J. (1985). Design practice: A review of prescriptions and recommendations from instructional design theories. Journal of Instructional Development, 8(4), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, J. G. (1999). On the proper treatment of learning and transfer: A study on introductory computer programming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

  • Seel, N. M., & Winn, W. D. (1997). Research on media and learning: Distributed cognition and semiotics. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Solving instructional design problems, instructional design: International perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 293–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G, & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Bastiaens, T., & Hoogveld, B. (2004). Instructional design for integrated e-learning. In W. Jochems, J. van Merriënboer, & R. Koper (Eds.), Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology, and organization (pp. 13–23). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002a). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming in instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dijkstra, S. (1997). The Four-Component Instructional Design Model for training complex cognitive skills. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Theory, research, and models of instructional design: International perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 427–447). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2003). Powerful learning and the many faces of instructional design: Towards a framework for the design of powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 3–20). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2002b). Redirecting learners’ attention during instruction: Effect on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Elen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarfo, F.K., Elen, J. Developing technical expertise in secondary technical schools: The effect of 4C/ID learning environments. Learning Environ Res 10, 207–221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9031-2

Keywords

Navigation