Skip to main content
Log in

Resource depletion versus landscape complementation: habitat selection by a multiple central place forager

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

The spatial distribution of non-substitutable resources implies diverging predictions for animal movement patterns. At broad scales, animals should respond to landscape complementation by selecting areas where resource patches are close-by to minimize movement costs. Yet at fine scales, central place effects lead to the depletion of patches that are close to one another and that should ultimately be avoided by consumers.

Objectives

We developed a multi-scale resource selection framework to test whether animal movement is driven by landscape complementation or resource depletion and identify at which spatial scale these processes are relevant from an animal’s perspective.

Methods

During the dry season, surface water and forage are non-substitutable resources for African elephants. Eight family herds were tracked using GPS loggers in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. We explained habitat selection during foraging trips by mapping surface water at two scales with gaussian kernels of varying widths placed over each waterhole.

Results

Unexpectedly, elephants select areas with low waterhole density at both fine scales (< 1 km) and broad scales (5–7 km). Selection is stronger when elephants forage far away from water, even more so as the dry season progresses.

Conclusions

Elephant selection of low waterhole density areas suggests that resource depletion around multiple central places is the main driver of their habitat selection. By identifying the scale at which animals respond to waterhole distribution we provide a template for water management in arid and semi-arid landscapes that can be tailored to match the requirements and mobility of free ranging wild or domestic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Director General of the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority and the Research Council of Zimbabwe are thanked for providing the opportunity to carry out this research. Funding was provided by the grant SAVARID ANR-11-CEPS-003 and the grant LANDTHIRST ANR-16-CE02-0001-01 of the French ‘Agence National de la Recherche’, and a PhD fellowship from the Ecole Normale Supérieure & Université de Montpellier. This work was conducted within the framework of the Zone Atelier Hwange—Hwange LTSER (www.za-hwange.cnrs.fr) and under the auspices of the Research Platform “Production and Conservation in Partnership” (www.rp-pcp.org), with support from the FSP-RenCaRe project (FSP No 2011-36). Special thanks to Simon Benhamou for insightful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. S. Cushman and two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Valls-Fox.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2553 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valls-Fox, H., De Garine-Wichatitsky, M., Fritz, H. et al. Resource depletion versus landscape complementation: habitat selection by a multiple central place forager. Landscape Ecol 33, 127–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0588-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0588-6

Keywords

Navigation