Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a forest patchwork: a connectivity analysis of the Bereg Plain landscape graph

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many species, one important key to persistence is maintaining connectivity among local populations that allow for dispersal and gene flow. This is probably true for carabid species (Coleoptera:Carabidae) living in the fragmented forests of the Bereg Plain (NE Hungary and W Ukraine). Based on field data, we have drafted a landscape graph of the area representing the habitat network of these species. Graph nodes and links represented two kinds of landscape elements: habitat (forest) patches and corridors, respectively. The quality of habitat patches and corridors were ranked (from low (1) to high (4)), reflecting local population sizes in the case of patches and estimated permeability in the case of corridors. We analysed (1) the positional importance of landscape elements in maintaining the connectivity of the intact network, (2) the effect of inserting hypothetical corridors into the network, (3) the effects of improving the quality of the existing corridors, and (4) how to connect every patch in a cost-effective way. Our results set quantitative priorities for conservation practice by identifying important corridors: what to protect, what to build and what to improve. Several network analytical techniques were used to account for the directed (source-sink) and highly fragmented nature of the landscape graph. We provide conservation priority ranks for the landscape elements and discuss the conditions for the use of particular network indices. Our study could be of extreme relevance, since a new highway is being planned through the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum KA, Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Cronin RT (2004) The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85:2671–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Burel F, Aviron S, Martin M, Ouin A, Pain G, Thenail C (2003) Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? Landsc Ecol 18:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Burel F (2004) Trophic flows and spatial heterogeneity in agricultural landscapes. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 317–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren A, Birath B, Kindvall O (2002) Effect of corridors and habitat edges on dispersal behavior, movement rates, and movement angles in Roesel’s bush-cricket (Metrioptera roeseli). Conserv Biol 16:1562–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP (2003) The key player problem. In: Breiger R, Carley K, Pattison P (eds) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, Committee on Human Factors, National Research Council, pp 241–252

  • Briers RA (2002) Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biol Conserv 103:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Pimm SL, Oyugi JO (1999) Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13:1140–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose U (2003a) Island biogeography of temporary wetland carabid beetle communities. J Biogeogr 30:879–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose U (2003b) Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia 135:407–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F (1989) Landscape structure effects on carabid beetles spatial patterns in western France. Landsc Ecol 4:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F (1992) Effect of landscape structure and dynamics on species diversity in hedgerow networks. Landsc Ecol 6:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell MD, Forman RTT (1993) Landscape graphs: ecological modelling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes. Landsc Ecol 8:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (2000) Effects of grassland fragmentation on insect species loss, colonization, and movement patterns. Ecology 81:2211–2226

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Pena NM, Butet A, Dlettre Y, Morant P, Burel F (2003) Landscape context and carabid beetles (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities of hedgerows in western France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Étienne RS (2004) On optimal choices in increase of patch area and reduction of interpatch distance for metapopulation persistence. Ecol Modell 179:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Browne DR, Cunningham A, Danielson BJ, Levey DJ, Sargent S, Spira T (2003) Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84:609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henein K, Merriam G (1990) The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable. Landsc Ecol 4:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishitani M, Kotze DJ, Niemelä J (2003) Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban-rural gradient in Japan. Ecography 26:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán F (2000) A reliability-theory approach to corridor design. Ecol Modell 128:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán F, Báldi A, Orci KM, Rácz I, Varga Z (2003) Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation. Landsc Ecol 18:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keitt TH, Urban DL, Milne BT (1997) Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Ecol 1(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller I, Largiadér CR (2003) Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles. Proc Roy Soc Lond, Ser B 270:417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh M (2003) Habitat fragmentation resulting in overgrazing by herbivores. J Theor Biol 225:453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotze DJ, Niemelä J, O’Hara RB, Turin H (2003) Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography 26:553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ködöböcz V, Magura T (2005) Forests of the Bereg-plain as refuges based on their carabid fauna (Coleoptera:Carabidae). Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 40:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (1994) Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science 264:1581–1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lövei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera:Carabidae). Annu Rev Entomol 41: 231–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lövei GL, Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Ködöböcz V (2006) The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in habitat islands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15: 283–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2000) Spatial distribution of carabid species along a grass-forest transects. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarium Hungariae 46:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2001a) Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodiv Conserv 10:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Ködöböcz V, Tóthmérész B (2001b) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. J Biogeogr 28:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2004) Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary. Landsc Ecol 19:747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Hartley D, Montes de Oca E (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O`Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham RL (1998) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2006) Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the prioritization of habitat patches for conservation. Landsc Ecol 21: 959–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker NH (1996) Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77:1210–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selonen V, Hanski IK (2003) Movements of the flying squirrel Pteromys volans in corridors and in matrix habitat. Ecography 26:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki H, Tamura M, Darman Y, Andronov V, Parilov MP, Nagendran M, Higuchi H (2004) Network analysis of potential migration routes for oriental white storks (Ciconia boyciana). Ecol Res 19:683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller DA, Schoener TW (1998) Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79:503–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suominen O, Niemelä J, Martikainen P, Niemelä P, Kojola I (2003) Impact of reindeer grazing on ground-dwelling Carabidae and Curculionidae assemblages in Lapland. Ecography 26:503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc Nat Acad Sci, USA 99:12923–12926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele HU (1977) Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Wissel C (1997) Corridors as conduits for small animals: attainable distances depending on movement pattern, boundary reaction and corridor width. Oikos 79:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Irmler U, Hingst R (1998) A simulation experiment on the potential of hedgerows as movement corridors for forest carabids. Ecol Modell 106:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000a). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000b) How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landsc Ecol 15:633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Foppen R, Chardon P, Opdam P, Luttikhuizen P (2001) Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds. Biol Conserv 100:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassermann S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for Zoltán Peresztegi-Nagy for developing a computer programme for one part of the analysis, András Báldi and Gábor Lövei for useful discussions and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. We thank K. Csepi and G. Lövei for linguistic revision. FJ and TM were supported by grants from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA T 37726 and F 61651, respectively). FJ was also supported by Society in Science: the Branco Weiss Fellowship from ETH Zürich, Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collegium Budapest, Institute for Advanced Study, Szentháromság u. 2, 1014, Budapest, Hungary

    Ferenc Jordán

  2. Animal Ecology Research Group of HAS, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary

    Ferenc Jordán

  3. Hortobágy National Park Directorate, Debrecen, Hungary

    Tibor Magura & Viktor Ködöböcz

  4. Ecological Institute of Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary

    Béla Tóthmérész

  5. Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary

    Vera Vasas

Authors
  1. Ferenc Jordán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tibor Magura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Béla Tóthmérész
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vera Vasas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Viktor Ködöböcz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferenc Jordán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordán, F., Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B. et al. Carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a forest patchwork: a connectivity analysis of the Bereg Plain landscape graph. Landscape Ecol 22, 1527–1539 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9149-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9149-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation