Skip to main content
Log in

Combustion properties and kinetics of different biomass samples using TG–MS technique

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, combustion properties and kinetics of different biomass samples known as poplar wood, hazelnut shell and wheat bran were studied using thermogravimetry–mass spectrometer. Experiments were performed at three different heating rates (10, 20 and 30 °C min−1) under air atmosphere. The reaction regions, peak and burnout temperatures, mass loss, maximum mass loss rate and residue of the biomass samples were determined. It was observed that all the biomass samples studied show similar combustion characteristics. This study was also focused on the main volatile products (H2, O, CO and CO2, etc.) of biomass combustion on the basis of their relative intensities across the temperature range 150–750 °C and on their relevancy, respectively. Activation energy and Arrhenius constant of the biomass samples were calculated using two different iso-conversional methods, known as Ozawa–Flynn–Wall and Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose. It was observed that the activation energy values were in the range of 66.80–68.56 kJ mol−1 for poplar wood, 83.73–93.25 kJ mol−1 for hazelnut shell and 162.17–167.4 kJ mol−1 for wheat bran, respectively. The biomass reactivity is directly related to the light volatile content, whereas combustion of fixed carbon affected the energy release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houghton RA. In: Jorgensen E-CSE, Fath B, editors. Encyclopedia of ecology. New York: Academic; 2008. p. 448–53.

  2. Lim CH, Lam H. Biomass demand-resources value targeting. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;87:1202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loo SV, Koppejan J. The Handbook of biomass combustion of co-firing. Sterling: Earthscan; 2008.

  4. Basu P. Economic issues of biomass energy conversion. Energy Convers Manag. 2013;75:25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayaraman K, Gokalp I. Thermal characterization, gasification and kinetic studies of different sized Indian coal and char particles. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math. 2014;6:31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraman K, Gokalp I. Pyrolysis, combustion and gasification characteristics of miscanthus and sewage sludge. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;89:83–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Magdziarz A, Wilk M. Thermal characteristics of the combustion process of biomass and sewage sludge. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;114–2:519–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coimbra RN, Paniagua S, Escapa C, Calvo LF, Otero M. Combustion of primary and secondary pulp mill sludge and their respective blends with coal: a thermogravimetric assessment. Renew Energy. 2015;83:1050–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilk M, Magdziarz A, Kalemba I, Gara P. Carbonisation of wood residue into charcoal during low temperature process. Renew Energy. 2016;85:507–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kok MV, Ozgur E. Thermal analysis and kinetics of biomass samples. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;114:739–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozgur E, Miller BG, Miller SF, Kok MV. Thermal analysis of co-firing of oil shale and biomass fuels. Oil Shale. 2012;29–2:190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gasparovic L, Korenova Z, Jelemensky L. Kinetic study of wood chips decomposition by TGA. In: 36th international conference of SSCHE, May 25–29, 2009, Slovakia.

  13. Seo DK, Park SS, Hwang J, Yu TU. Study of the pyrolysis of biomass using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and concentration measurements of the evolved species. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2010;89–91; 66–73.

  14. Slopiecka P, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F. Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of poplar wood pyrolysis. In: 3rd international conference on applied energy, May 16–18, 2011, Italy.

  15. Qing W, Hao X, Honpeng L, Chunxia J. Thermogravimetric analysis of the combustion characteristics of oil shale semi-coke-biomass blends. Oil Shale. 2011;28–2:284–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar A, Lijun W, Yuris A. Thermogravimetric characterization of corn stover as gasification and pyrolysis feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32:460–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansaray KG, Ghaly AE. Determination of reaction kinetics of rice husks in air using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Sources. 1999;21–10:899–911.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiricek I, Rudasov P, Zemlov TA. Thermogravimetric study of the behaviour of biomass blends during combustion. Acta Polytech. 2012;52:39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vamvuka D, Krampinis E, Karakas E. Comparative study of combustion properties of five energy crops and Greek lignite. Energy Fuels. 2012;26–2:869–78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jayaraman K, Gokalp I. Gasification characteristics of petcoke and coal blended petcoke using thermogravimetry and mass spectrometry analysis. Appl Thermal Eng. 2015;80:10–9.

  21. Rueda-Ordóñez YJ. Tannous, K Iso-conversional kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of sugarcane straw for thermal conversion processes. Bioresour Technol. 2015;196:136–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo DK, Park SS, Hwang J, Yu TU. Study of the pyrolysis of biomass using thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and concentration measurements of the evolved species. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2010;89:66–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ounas A, Aboulkas A. Pyrolysis of olive residue and sugarcane bagasse: nonisothermal thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:11234–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vyazovkin S. Model-free kinetics. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;83:45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozawa TA. New method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1965;38:1881–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Flynn JH, Wall LA. General treatment of the thermogravimetry of polymers. J Res Natl Bur. 1966;70A–6:487–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Akahira T, Sunose T. Joint convention of four electrical institutes: research report. Sci Technol. 1971;16:22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seo DK, Park SS, Kim YT, Hwand J. Study of coal pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis and concentration measurements of the evolved species. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2011;92:209–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang G, Zhang J, Geng W. Study on CO2 gasification properties and kinetics of biomass chars and anthracite char. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:66–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Masnadi MS, Habibi R, Hill JM, Bi X. Fuel characterization and co-pyrolysis kinetics of biomass and fossil fuels. Fuel. 2014;117:1204–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiang L, Chen M, Wei Y. Kinetics based on two-stage scheme for co-combustion of herbaceous biomass and bituminous coal. Fuel. 2015;143:577–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation for the support of Labex CAPRYSSES, Université d’Orléans, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Versan Kok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayaraman, K., Kok, M.V. & Gokalp, I. Combustion properties and kinetics of different biomass samples using TG–MS technique. J Therm Anal Calorim 127, 1361–1370 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-6042-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-6042-1

Keywords

Navigation