Skip to main content
Log in

Hydration of humic and fulvic acids studied by DSC

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative aspects of hydration of four humic acids (HA) and three fulvic acids (FA) originating from different sources were investigated. DSC experiments at subambient temperatures were carried out in order to monitor differences in ice behavior originating from freezable water surrounding humic molecules. It was found that kinetic effects play a significant role in hydration processes of both HA and FA. In fact, the hydration took part over 21 days which was detected as a progressive decrease in ice melting enthalpy. Simultaneously, the peak shapes and positions changed indicating structural changes in the physical structure of the humic substances. In case of FA, the dependency of melting enthalpy on water concentration showed a linear trend resembling a complete hydration previously observed for water-soluble hydrophilic polymers. In contrast, the melting enthalpy of some HA increased in a step-like way with increasing water content, suggesting preservation of original hydrophobic scaffold during the hydration. The differences between the rather young FA and the rather old HA lead to the conclusion that water can play a significant role in processes of humification. We assume that separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic domains and thus increase in nanoscale heterogeneity represents an important physical contribution to the overall humification process. It was also demonstrated that the higher content of oxygen in humic molecules is not the only indicator of higher water holding capacity. Instead the porosity of humic matrix seems to contribute as additional parameter into these processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutton R, Sposito G. Molecular structure in soil humic substances? The new view. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:9009–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schaumann GE, Hurrass J, Műller M, Rotard W. Swelling of organic matter in soil and peat samples: Insights from proton relaxation, water absorption and PAH extraction. In: Ghabbour EA, Davies G, editors. Humic substances: nature’s most versatile materials. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2004. p. 101–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vaxelaire J, Cézac P. Moisture distribution in activated sludges: a review. Water Res. 2004;38:2215–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vesilind PA. The role of water in sludge dewatering. Water Environ Res. 1994;66:4–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsang KR, Vesilind PA. Moisture distribution in sludges. Water Sci Technol. 1990;22:135–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vesilind PA, Hsu CC. Limits of sludge dewaterability. Water Sci Technol. 1997;36:87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Cowman MK. Thermal analysis of semi-dilute hyaluronan solutions. J Therm Anal Cal. 2000;59:547–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prawitwong P, Takigami S, Phillips GO. Phase transition behavior of sorbed water in Konjac mannan. Food Hydrocoll. 2007;21:1368–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurrass J, Schaumann GE. Hydration kinetics of wettable and water-repellent soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2007;71:280–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaumann GE. Matrix relaxation and change of water state during hydration of peat. Colloid Surf A. 2005;265:163–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaeger F, Shchegolikhina A, Van As H, Schaumann GE. Proton NMR relaxometry as a useful tool to evaluate swelling processes of peat soils. Open Magn Reson J. 2010;3:27–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graber ER, Borisover MD. Hydration-facilitated sorption of specifically interacting organic compounds by model soil organic matter. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32:258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borisover M, Reddy M, Graber ER. Solvation effect on organic compound interactions in soil organic matter. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:2518–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Borisover M, Graber ER. Relationship between strength of organic sorbate interactions in NOM and hydration effect on sorption. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:4570–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Borisover M. Hydration-assisted sorption of a probe organic compound at different peat hydration levels: the link solvation model. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:547–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaumann GE, Bertmer M. Do water molecules bridge soil organic matter molecule segments? Eur J Soil Sci. 2008;59:423–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schaumann GE, Leboeuf EJ. Glass transitions in peat: their relevance and the impact of water. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:800–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida H, Hakateyama T, Hakateyama H. Characterization of water in polysaccharide hydrogels by DSC. J Therm Anal. 1993;40:483–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takigami S, Takigami M, Phillips GO. Hydration characteristics of the cross-linked hyaluronan derivative hylan. Carbohydr Polym. 1993;22:153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hakateyama H, Hakateyama T. Interaction between water and hydrophilic polymers. Thermochim Acta. 1998;308:3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Průšová A, Šmejkalová D, Chytil M, Velebný V, Kučerík J. An alternative DSC approach to study hydration of hyaluronan. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82:498–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kučerík J, Čechlovská H, Bursáková P, Pekař M. The thermodynamic stability and molecular feature of lignite humic acids aggregates studied by high resolution ultrasonic spectroscopy. J Therm Anal Cal. 2009;96:637–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchida T, Nagayama M, Shibayama T, Gohara K. Morphological investigation of disaccharide molecules for growth inhibition of ice crystals. J Cryst Growth. 2007;299:125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez JM, Plante AF, Leifeld J, Rasmussen C. Methodological considerations for using thermal analysis in the characterization of soil organic matter. J Therm Anal Cal. 2011;104:289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siewert C, Demyan MS, Kučerík J. Interrelation between soil respiration and its thermal stability. J Therm Anal Cal. 2010. doi:10.1007/s10973-011-2099-z.

  27. Aquino A, Tunega D, Pasalic H, Schaumann GE. Molecular dynamics simulations of water molecule-bridges in polar domains of humic acids. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. doi:10.1021/es201831g.

  28. Piccolo A. The supramolecular structure of humic substances. Soil Sci. 2001;166:810–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiří Kučerík.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kučerík, J., Bursáková, P., Průšová, A. et al. Hydration of humic and fulvic acids studied by DSC. J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 451–459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2178-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2178-1

Keywords

Navigation