Skip to main content
Log in

CO2 and SO2 uptake by oil shale ashes

Effect of pre-treatment on kinetics

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present research, CO2 and SO2 binding ability of different oil shale ashes and the effect of pre-treatment (grinding, preceding calcination) of these ashes on their binding properties and kinetics was studied using thermogravimetric, SEM, X-ray, and energy dispersive X-ray analysis methods. It was shown that at 700 °C, 0.03–0.28 mmol of CO2 or 0.16–0.47 mmol of SO2 was bound by 100 mg of ash in 30 min. Pre-treatment conditions influenced remarkably binding parameters. Grinding decreased CO2 binding capacities, but enhanced SO2 binding in the case of fluidized bed ashes. Grinding of pulverized firing ashes increased binding parameters with both gases. Calcination at higher temperatures decreased binding parameters of both types of ashes with both gases studied. Clarification of this phenomenon was given. Kinetic analysis of the binding process was carried out, mechanism of the reactions and respective kinetic constants were determined. It was shown that the binding process with both gases was controlled by diffusion. Activation energies in the temperature interval of 500–700 °C for CO2 binding with circulating fluidized bed combustion ashes were in the range of 48–82 kJ mol−1, for SO2 binding 43–107 kJ mol−1. The effect of pre-treatment on the kinetic parameters was estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ots A. Oil shale combustion technology. Tallinn: SC Estonian Energy; 2004.

  2. Kuusik R, Uibu M, Kirsimäe K. Characterization of oil shale ashes formed at industrial-scale CFBC boilers. Oil Shale. 2005;22:407–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuusik R, Uibu M, Toom M, Muulmann ML, Kaljuvee T, Trikkel A. Sulphation and carbonization of oil shale CFBC ashes in heterogeneous systems. Oil Shale. 2005;22:421–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaljuvee T, Toom M, Trikkel A, Kuusik R. Reactivity of oil shale ashes in the binding of SO2. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;88:51–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuusik R, Türn L, Trikkel A, Uibu M. Carbon dioxide binding in the heterogeneous systems formed at combustion of oil shale. 2. Interactions of system components—thermodynamic analysis. Oil Shale. 2002;19:143–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jia L, Anthony EJ. Pacification of FBC ash in a pressurized TGA. Fuel. 2000;79:1109–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony EJ, Jia L, Woods J, Roque W, Burwell S. Pacification of high calcic residues using carbon dioxide. Waste Manag. 2000;20:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaljuvee T, Kuusik R, Radin M. Carbon dioxide binding in the heterogeneous systems formed at combustion of oil shale. 4. Reactivity of ashes towards acid gases in the system fly ash—flue gases. Oil Shale. 2004;21:13–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abanades JC. The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3. Chem Eng J. 2002;90:303–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee DK. An apparent kinetic model for the carbonation of calcium oxide by carbon dioxide. Chem Eng J. 2004;100:71–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beruto DT, Vecchiattini R, Giordani M. Solid products and rate-limiting step in the thermal half decomposition of natural dolomite in a CO2(g) atmosphere. Thermochim Acta. 2003;405:183–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Salvador C, Lu D, Anthony EJ, Abanades JC. Enhancement of CaO for CO2 capture in an FBC environment. Chem Eng J. 2003;96:187–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chrissafis K. Multicyclic study on the carbonation of CaO using different limestones. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;89:525–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanmore BR, Gilot P. Review—calcination and carbonation of limestone during thermal cycling for CO2 sequestration. Fuel Process Technol. 2005;86:1707–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohamed AR. Kinetic model for the reaction between SO2 and coal fly ash/CaO/CaSO4 sorbent. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;79:691–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuusik R, Kaljuvee T, Trikkel A, Arro H. Reactivity of oil shale ashes towards sulfur dioxide. 2. Low temperature ashes formed by using CFBC technology. Oil Shale. 1999;16:51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KT, Bhatia S, Mohamed AR, Chu KH. Optimizing the specific surface area of fly ash-based sorbents for flue gas desulfurization. Chemosphere. 2006;62:89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernindez J, Renedo MJ, Pesquera A, Irabien JA. Effect of CaSO4 on the structure and use of Ca(OH)2/fly ash sorbents for SO2 removal. Powder Technol. 2001;119:201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anthony EJ, Bulewicz EM, Jia L. Reactivation of limestone sorbents in FBC for SO2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2007;33:171–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trikkel A, Zevenhoven R, Kuusik R. Modelling SO2 capture by Estonian limestones and dolomites. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Chem. 2000;49:53–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaljuvee T, Trikkel A, Kuusik R. Decarbonization of natural lime-containing materials and reactivity of calcined products towards SO2 and CO2. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2001;64:1229–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Crnkovic PM, Milioli FE, Pagliuso JD. Kinetics study of the SO2 sorption by Brazilian dolomite using thermogravimetry. Thermochim Acta. 2006;447:161–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iisa K, Hupa M, Yrjas P. Product layer diffusion in the sulphation of calcium carbonate. Symp (Int) Combust. 1992;24:1349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaljuvee T, Trikkel A, Kuusik R, Bender V. The role of MgO in the binding of SO2 by lime-containing materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;80:591–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reich L, Stivala SS. Computer analysis of non-isothermal TG data for mechanism and activation energy. Part I. Thermochim Acta. 1984;73:165–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kök M, Pokol G, Keskin C, Madarász J, Bagci S. Combustion characteristics of lignite and oil shale samples by thermal analysis techniques. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;76:247–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Qi H, You C, Xu X. Kinetic model of CaO/fly ash sorbent for flue gas desulphurization at moderate temperatures. Fuel. 2007;86:785–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu ZH, Kou P, Yu ZW. The modulation of desulphurization properties of calcium oxide by alkali carbonates. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2002;67:745–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Estonian Science Foundation (G7379) and Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (SF0140082s08). Authors express their gratitude to Dr Olga Volobujeva (Tallinn University of Technology) for the help in carrying out SEM and EDX analysis and to Dr Kalle Kirsimäe (Tartu University) for performing quantitative X-ray analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Trikkel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trikkel, A., Keelmann, M., Kaljuvee, T. et al. CO2 and SO2 uptake by oil shale ashes. J Therm Anal Calorim 99, 763–769 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0423-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0423-7

Keywords

Navigation