Skip to main content
Log in

Preparing the Next Generation of Science Teacher Educators: A Model for Developing PCK for Teaching Science Teachers

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Science education doctoral programs often fail to address a critical piece—the explicit attention to the preparation of future science teacher educators. In this article, we argue that, in addition to developing skills and a knowledge base for research, doctoral students must be given the opportunity to observe, practice, and reflect on the pedagogical knowledge necessary to instruct science teachers. In particular, we contend that the construct of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) can be adapted to the context of knowledge for teaching science teachers. We use the PCK construct to propose a model for the development of knowledge for teaching science teachers, grounded in our experiences as doctoral students and faculty mentors. We end by recommending a vision for doctoral preparation and a new standard to be included in the ASTE Professional Knowledge Standards for Science Teacher Educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K. (1997). The professional development of science teacher educators: Is there a missing piece? Electronic Journal of Science Education [On-line], 1(4). Retrieved February 2, 2008 from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/abell.html.

  • Abell, S. K. (2003). Reflecting on elementary science. Retrieved October 5, 2008 from http://roes.missouri.edu.

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. S. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 10) (pp. 103–129). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. L., Davis, G., Fagen, A. P., Niebur, S. M., & Wells, K. S. (2001). The 2000 National Doctoral Program Survey. Retrieved February 2, 2008 from http://survey.nagps.org.

  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of scientists: The Draw-A-Scientist test. Science Education, 67, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstgeest, J. (2001). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science…taking the plunge: How to teach science more effectively for ages 5 to 12 (2nd ed., pp. 25–35). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, A. P., & Niebur, S. M. (2000, December). Preliminary results for the national doctoral program survey: 32,000 student experiences. Paper presented at the Council of Graduate Schools 40th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P., & Dana, T. (2003). Using a card sorting task to elicit and clarify science teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2001). Primary science…taking the plunge: How to teach science more effectively for ages 5 to 12 (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W., Macro, C., Reed, K., & Schilling, M. (2003). Making progress in primary science: A study book for teachers and student teachers. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablon, P. C. (2002). The status of science education doctoral programs in the United States: The need for core knowledge and skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1). Retrieved October 5, 2007 from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html.

  • Jelly, S. (2001). Helping children raise questions, and answering them. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science…taking the plunge: How to teach science more effectively for ages 5 to 12 (2nd ed., pp. 36–47). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. (1990). The science autobiography. Science and Children, 28(3), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Kuerbis, P., Loving, C., Ramey-Gassert, L., Roychoudhury, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., & Woodford, B. J. (2000). Re-envisioning the Ph.D. What concerns do we have? Seattle: University of Washington Center for Instructional Development and Research.

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Association for Science Teacher Education annual meeting in January, 2007, in Clearwater Beach, Florida. We wish to thank the following individuals who offered helpful written feedback on our work: Cheryl Bell, Emily Borda, Betsy Davis, Cody Sandifer, and Joe Taylor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra K. Abell.

About this article

Cite this article

Abell, S.K., Rogers, M.A.P., Hanuscin, D.L. et al. Preparing the Next Generation of Science Teacher Educators: A Model for Developing PCK for Teaching Science Teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 20, 77–93 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6

Keywords

Navigation