Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of the corrections for accidental coincidences in liquid scintillation counting measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods for the evaluation of the accidental coincidences counting rates in triple-to-double coincidences ratio (TDCR) liquid scintillation (LS) measurements have been proposed recently. This study shows how these corrections can be extended to two detector systems, such as commercial LS counters, or four-detector systems used for the compton source efficiency tracing (CSET) method. The significance of performing corrections for accidental coincidences in low-activity LS counting or TDCR measurements is demonstrated. The impact of accidental coincidences on the determination of half-life of radioisotopes is also shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donald LH (1974) Applications of liquid scintillation counting. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dutsov C, Cassette P, Sabot B, Mitev K (2020) Evaluation of the accidental coincidence counting rates in TDCR counting. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section a: accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benoit Sabot, Chavdar Dutsov, Philippe Cassette, Krasimir Mitev, Performance of portable TDCR systems developed at LNE-LNHB (2022) Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section a: accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, To be published

  4. Broda R, Pochwalski K, Radoszewski T (1988) Calculation of liquid-scintillation detector efficiency. Int J Radiat Appl Intstrum A Appl Radiat Isot 39(2):159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Birks JB (1964) The theory and practice of scintillation counting. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassette P, Do P (2008) The Compton source efficiency tracing method in liquid scintillation counting: a new standardization method using a TDCR counter with a Compton spectrometer. Applied radiation and isotopes (Vol. 66, Issues 6 7, pp. 1026–1032). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bignell, L. J., Mo, L., Steele, T., & Hashemi-Nezhad, S. R. (2013). The Zero Model by Using Coincidence Scintillation (ZoMBieS) Method of Absolute Radioactivity Measurement. In IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (Vol. 60, Issue 5, pp. 4007–4014). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2013.2275990

  8. Dutsov C, Cassette P, Mitev K, Sabot B (2021) In quest of the optimal coincidence resolving time in TDCR LSC. Nucl Instrum Meth A 987:164846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lombardi P, Ortica F, Ranucci G, Romani A (2013) Decay time and pulse shape discrimination of liquid scintillators based on novel solvents. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section a: accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jordanov V, Cassette P, Dutsov Ch, Mitev K (2020) Development and applications of a miniature TDCR acquisition system for in-situ radionuclide metrology. Nucl Instrum Meth A 954:161202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. A. Kellett and O. Bersillon (2017) The Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP) and the JEFF-3.3 radioactive decay data library: Combining international collaborative efforts on evaluated decay data. In: A. Plompen, F.-J. Hambsch, P. Schillebeeckx, W. Mondelaers, J. Heyse, S. Kopecky, P. Siegler, and S. Oberstedt (eds) EPJ Web Conferences 146 p 02009

  12. Bouchard J, Cassette P (2000) MAC3: an electronic module for the processing of pulses delivered by a three photomultiplier liquid scintillation counting system. Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Vol. 52, Issue 3, pp. 669–672). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutsov C, Mitev K, Cassette P, Jordanov V (2019) Study of two different coincidence counting algorithms in TDCR measurements. Appl Radiat Isot 154:108895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bobin C, Thiam C, Bouchard J, Jaubert F (2010) Application of a stochastic TDCR model based on Geant4 for Cherenkov primary measurements. Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Vol. 68, Issue 12, pp. 2366–2371). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Broda R, Cassette P, Kossert K (2007) Radionuclide metrology using liquid scintillation counting. Metrologia (Vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. S36–S52). IOP Publishing, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Philippe Gervais from CEA/SHFJ for providing sample of 18F solution. This work was funded by the French national metrology institute: Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE). The authors are indebted to Dr Karsten Kossert for providing the 53Mn sample. The measurement of Po-209 samples were performed in the framework of DORN project. The authors thank Margot Corbel from CEA/LNHB for the preparation of the 209Po sample.

Funding

This work is supported by the Bulgarian National Scientific Research Fund under contract KP-06-H38/9 from 06.12.19 (TDCX).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chavdar Dutsov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutsov, C., Sabot, B., Cassette, P. et al. Significance of the corrections for accidental coincidences in liquid scintillation counting measurements. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 3303–3311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08316-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08316-y

Keywords

Navigation