Skip to main content
Log in

Inconsistencies of neutron flux parameters for k0 standardization in neutron activation analysis determined with the use of Au+Zr and Au+Mo+Cr monitor sets at the LVR-15 reactor in Řež

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multipurpose research reactors require monitoring of neutron flux parameters (α, f, F c or Φ th ) during every irradiation of samples when k0 standardization in neutron activation analysis is to be used, because the above parameters may change quite frequently and unpredictably. We tested two monitor sets consisting of Au+Zr and Au+Mo+Cr for determination of the neutron flux parameters in k0-NAA at the LVR-15 reactor in Řež. Based on analysis of several reference materials, we found the use of the Au+Zr monitor set superior over the Au+Mo+Cr monitor set in the specific conditions of the LVR-15 reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Corte F, Simonits A (1994) Vademecum for k0 users. DSM Research, Geleen

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Sluijs R (2003) KAYZERO/SOLCOI®, User’s manual for reactor neutron activation analysis using the k0 standardization method, Ver. 5a, k0-Ware, Heerlen

  3. De Corte F (1987) The k0-standardization method. A move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. University of Gent, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koster-Ammerlaan MJJ, Bacchi MA, Bode P, De Nadai Fernandes EA (2008) A new monitor for routine thermal and epithermal neutron fluence rate monitoring in k0 INAA. Appl Rad Isotopes 66:1964–1969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoo KS, Sarmani SB, Tan CH, Ti KL (2007) Variation of neutron parameters and neutron flux in an irradiation container at selected irradiation channels by using two neutron flux monitoring sets based on k0-NAA method, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Modern Trends in Activation Analysis (MTAA-12), September 16–21, 2007, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, p 124

  6. Montoya E, Mendoza P, Bedregal P, Ubillús M, Torres B, Cohen IM (2007) The set Au–Zr–Mo–Cr–Lu as multiple reactor flux monitor. The performance of 96Zr and the analysis of inconsistencies. Informe Científico Tecnológico (ICT) and Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear (IPEN), Lima, pp 15–19, ISSN 1684-1662

  7. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Validation of k0 standardization method in neutron activation analysis using Kayzero program for Windows. Chem Listy 105:261–268 (in Czech)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Validation of k0 standardization in neutron activation analysis—the use of Kayzero for Windows programme at the Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež. Nucl Instrum Methods A 622:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2011) Comparison of Kayzero for Windows and k0-IAEA software packals for k0 standardization in neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods A 654:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. NIST SRM-3121, SRM-3134, SRM-3112a, SRM-1547, SRM-2711, SRM-1633b. U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithesburg, MD, USA. http://www.nist.gov downloaded 1.7.2010

  11. Vermaercke P, Robouch P, Eguskiza M, De Corte F, Kennedy G, Smodiš B, Jačimović R, Yonezawa C, Matsue H, Lin X, Blaauw M, Kučera J (2006) Characterisation of synthetic multi-element standards (SMELS) used for the validation of k0-NAA. Nucl Instrum Methods A 564:675–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO Guide 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4 (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn

  14. ISO/IEC Guide 98 (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koster-Ammerlaan MJJ, Bode P, Winkelman AJM (2011) Photoneutrons from a beryllium reflector: a potential source of problems with Zr–Au flux monitors in k0 standardization based neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-011-1241-5

  16. Vermaercke P, Sneyers L, Bruggeman M, De Wispelaere A, De Corte F (2008) Neutron spectrum calibration using the Cd-ratio for multi-monitor method with a synthetic multi-element standard. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:631–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brockman JD, Peters NJ, Robertson JD (2009) Variation in k0 neutron flux parameters after replacement of the beryllium reflector and graphite wedge at the University of Missouri research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:41–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin X, Henkelmann R, Türler A, Gestenberg H, De Corte F (2006) Neutron flux parameters at irradiation positions in the new research reactor FRM-II. Nucl Instrum Methods A 564:641–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Corte F, Sordo-El Hammami K, Moens L, Simonits A, De Wispelaere A, Hoste J (1981) The accuracy and precision of the experimental α determination in the 1/E1+α epithermal reactor neutron spectrum. J. Radioanal. Chem. 62:209–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by project GACR 202/09/0363.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Kubešová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubešová, M., Kučera, J. Inconsistencies of neutron flux parameters for k0 standardization in neutron activation analysis determined with the use of Au+Zr and Au+Mo+Cr monitor sets at the LVR-15 reactor in Řež. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293, 665–674 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1709-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1709-y

Keywords

Navigation