Abstract
In gamma-ray spectra, acquired in the absence of the sample, peaks occur which belong to the spectrometer background. When samples are measured, which contain radionuclides that appear in the background also and have activities near the detection level, the background contributes substantially to the peak areas. In the extreme case, when the contribution of the sample is much smaller than the contribution of the background, the peak area attributed to the radionuclide within a sample has the same probability of being positive or negative. Therefore, to interpret the results obtained from measurements of low-activity samples, the performance of the spectrum analysis procedure near the detection level must be known. To test the performance of the spectrum analysis procedure at low activities, the spectrometer background spectra were analyzed as if they had been water samples, prepared as dry residue obtained by evaporation of 50 L of water. The probabilities for false positives together with their decision thresholds are given for radionuclides appearing in the background spectra. For some of the radionuclides that do not appear in the background spectra, probabilities for false detection are given as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_1.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2007
De Geer L-E (2004) Currie detection limits in gamma-ray spectroscopy. Appl Radiat Isot 61:151–160
Canberra Industries (1998) Model 48-1098 Genie VMS Spectroscopy System, Canberra Industries Inc., Meriden
Hurtgen C, Jerome S, Woods M (2004) Revisiting Currie—how low can you go? Appl Radiat Isot 53:45–50
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korun, M., Kovačič, K. & Vodenik, B. Probability for Type I errors in gamma-ray spectrometric measurements of drinking water samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286, 553–556 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0760-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0760-9