Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing reactor operations from uranium targets used for the production of plutonium

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents results from the examination of a number of archived neutron-irradiated uranium targets used for past plutonium production testing. Three of these targets were destructively characterized using Los Alamos National Laboratory actinide analytical chemistry capabilities. A validated conduct-of-operations protocol was followed for this characterization effort. Chemical analyses included measurements for radionuclides, uranium assay, uranium isotopic abundances, trace actinides, trace metals, and non-metals. Material scientists also examined materials for morphological and microstructural properties and individual particles were examined for trace impurities. After characterization of the targets was completed, a reactor modeling effort was undertaken to corroborate target details in historical records. Time since irradiation calculations utilized both activation and fission products. The described examination of uranium targets has a tremendous impact from a safeguards verification and nuclear forensics perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ehmann WD, Vance DE (1993) Radiochemistry and nuclear methods of analysis. Wiley, New York, p 549

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Soete D, Gijbels R, Hoste J (1972) Neutron activation analysis. Wiley-Interscience, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dreicer JS (1997) Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos Technical Report LA-UR-97-2652

  4. Wilson R (1983) Nature 302:373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Albright D, Hibbs M (1992) Bull At Sci 48:30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith DK, Kristo MJ, Niemeyer S, Dudder GB (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276:415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayer K, Wallenius M, Fanghanel T (2007) J Alloys Compd 444–445:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moody KJ, Hutcheon D, Grant PM (2005) Nuclear forensic analysis. Taylor & Group, Boca Raton, p 485

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reilly D, Ensslin N, Smith H (1990) Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, Los Alamos Technical Report, LA-UR-90-0732

  10. Lakosi L, Veres A (1990) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, A 299:463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tandon L, Hastings E, Banar J, Barnes J et al (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276:467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer K, Rasmussen G, Hild M, Zuleger E, et al. (2003) In advances in destructive and non-destructive analysis for environmental monitoring and nuclear forensics. In: Proceedings of an international conference, Proceedings Series, IAEA; Vienna, p 392

  13. Myers SC, Gruetzmacher KM, Bustos RM, Ferran SG (2001 & 2002) Los Alamos National Laboratory, Technical Report numbers LA-UR-01-5728, LA-UR-02-3923

  14. Sampson TE, Kelley TA (1997) Appl Radiat Isot 48:1543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vondreele RB (1997) J Appl Crystallogr 30:517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Callis EL, Abernathy RM (1991) Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Process 103:93

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marsh SF, Ortiz MR, Abernathey RM, Rein JE (1974) Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos Technical Report LA-5568

  18. Abernathey RM, Matlack GM, Rein JE (1972) Proceedings of a symposium on analytical methods in nuclear fuel cycle. IAEA; Vienna

  19. Croff AG (1983) Nucl Technol 62:335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peerani P, Carbol P, Hrnecek E, Betti ME (2002) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 482:42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahl W, Degering D, Lierse C, Lin X (1996) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 369:627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Benedict M, Levi H, Pigford T (1982) Nuclear chemical engineering. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, p 476

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katz JJ, Seaborg GT, Morss LR (1986) The chemistry of actinide elements, vol 1. Chapman and Hall, London, p 998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

U. S. Department of Energy NNSA-NA-22 and NA-241, Programs from Los Alamos National Laboratory supported the work described. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract number DE-AC52-06NA25396. This publication is LAUR-09-2075. We would like to thank Cari Zocco at Los Alamos National Laboratory for her assistance with the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Kuhn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tandon, L., Kuhn, K., Martinez, P. et al. Establishing reactor operations from uranium targets used for the production of plutonium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282, 573–579 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0297-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0297-y

Keywords

Navigation