Skip to main content
Log in

The Intersection of Emotional and Sociocognitive Competencies with Civic Engagement in Middle Childhood and Adolescence

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Civic developmental theory anticipates connections between normative developmental competencies and civic engagement, but little previous research has directly studied such links. The current study sought to contribute to civic development theory by examining associations between emotional and sociocognitive competencies (empathy, emotion regulation, prosocial moral reasoning, future-orientation) and civic engagement (volunteering, informal helping, political behaviors and beliefs, environmental behaviors, social responsibility values, civic skills). Data came from a geographically and racially diverse sample of 2467 youth (Mage = 13.4, Range: 8–20 years, 56% female). The results indicated that empathy and future-orientation significantly predicted nearly all forms of civic engagement, whereas emotion regulation and prosocial moral reasoning were uniquely associated with specific forms of civic engagement. Exploratory multi-group models indicated that empathy and emotion regulation were more strongly associated with civic engagement among younger youth and prosocial moral reasoning and future-orientation were more strongly related to civic engagement among older youth. The findings help to advance developmental theory of youth civic engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social well‐being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26(3), 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, J. E., Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H. (2017). The specificity principle in acculturation science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 3–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G. (2014). The development and correlates of prosocial moral behaviors. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2nd ed.). (pp. 208–234). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., & Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2011). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410375921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.

  • Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 561–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Côté, S., DeCelles, K. A., McCarthy, J. M., Van Kleef, G. A., & Hideg, I. (2011). The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence: Emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates both prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1073–1080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social-psychological approach. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. N., Skay, C. L., Pettingell, S. L., & Borowsky, I. W. (2009). From adolescent connections to social capital: Predictors of civic engagement in young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(2), 161–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (1990). Prosocial development in early and mid-adolescence. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? Advances in adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 240–269). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2006). Prosocial Behavior. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2009). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 129–148). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy‐related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial orientation. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. 6th edn. (pp. 646–718). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Spinrad, T. (2007). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol 3 Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (6th ed.). (pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., & Carlo, G. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 993–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T. L. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: Sharpening the definition. Child Development, 75, 334–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. (2014). Social participation and social trust in adolescence: The importance of heterogeneous encounters. In A. M. Otto (Ed.), Processes of community change and social action (pp. 149–202). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 159–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, political socialization, and civic engagement. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 721–745). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A., Syvertsen, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007). Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE).

  • Galinsky, E. (1999). Ask the children: What America’s children really think about working parents. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. A. (2007). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(6–7), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, J. D., Voight, A., Wegman, H., & Nation, M. (2013). How do varying types of youth civic engagement relate to perceptions of school climate? Applied Developmental Science, 17(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2013.804377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data theory. Missing Data (pp. 3–46). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Matsuba, K., & Atkins, R. (2014). Civic engagement and child and adolescent well-being. Handbook of child well-being (pp. 957–975). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H., & Hogan, A. (2006). Beyond conventional civic participation, beyond the moral-political divide: Young people and contemporary debates about citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 35, 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240601012238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, W. J., Rhemtulla, M., & Little, T. D. (2015). Using principal components as auxiliary variables in missing data estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(3), 285–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Andolina, M. (1990). Three core measures of community-based civic engagement: Evidence from the youth civic engagement indicators project. In Child Trends Conference on Indicators of Positive Development. Presented at the Child Trends Conference on Indicators of Positive Development March 11–12, 2003. Washington, DC.

  • Jugert, P., Eckstein, K., Noack, P., Kuhn, A., & Benbow, A. (2013). Offline and online civic engagement among adolescents and young adults from three ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1–13.

  • Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakos, H. L., Voight, A., Geller, J. D., Nixon, C. T., & Nation, M. (2016). Student civic participation and school climate: Associations at multiple levels of the school ecology. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(2), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn Jr., P. H. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63, 416–430.

  • Kim, Y. C., & Ball‐Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16(2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, B. (2009). “Power in numbers”: Youth organizing as a context for exploring civic identity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 414–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In: T. Mischel (ed.) Psychology and genetic epistemology. (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Perkins, D. D., Santinello, M., Elgar, F. J., Morgan, A., & Mazzardis, S. (2012). Family affluence, school and neighborhood contexts and adolescents’ civic engagement: A cross-national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1–2), 197–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Champine, R. B., Warren, D. J., & Erickson, K. (2014). Development of civic engagement: Theoretical and methodological issues. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8(3–4), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Bizan, S., Bowers, E. P., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). One good thing leads to another: Cascades of positive youth development among American adolescents. Development and psychopathology, 22(04), 759–770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDermott, S. T., Gullone, E., Allen,J. S., King, N. J., & Tonge, B. J. (2009). The emotion regulation index for children and adolescents (ERICA): A psychometric investigation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9154-0.

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., & Ferris, K. (2013). Adolescents’ domain-specific judgments about different forms of civic involvement: Variations by age and gender. Journal of adolescence, 36(3), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., Oosterhoff, B., Palmer, C. A., & Ferris, K. (2014). Dimensions of citizenship: Associations among adolescents’ sociopolitical values and civic judgments. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., & Smetana, J. G. (2009). Adolescent civic and political engagement: associations between domain-specific judgments and behavior. Child Development, 80, 433–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., & Smetana, J. G. (2010). Social sociocognitive development and adolescent civic engagement. In L. Sherrod, C. Flanagan & J. Torney-Purta (Eds.), Handbook research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 221–248). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., Syvertsen, A. K., Oosterhoof, B., Babskie, E., & Wray-Lake, L. (2016). How children understand civic actions: A mixed methods perspective. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31, 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (2009). Adolescence. In U. Muller, J. Carpendale & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to PIAGET (pp. 255–269). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J. E. (1987). Age, sex, social class, and quality of family interaction as determinants of adolescents’ future orientation: A developmental task interpretation. Adolescence, 22(88), 977–991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obradović, J., & Masten, A. S. (2007). Developmental antecedents of young adult civic engagement. Applied developmental Science, 11(1), 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pancer, S. M. (2015). The psychology of citizenship and civic engagement. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon, R. Lerner & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development: Vol. 3. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.). (pp. 66–166). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Jankowski, M. (2002). Minority youth and civic engagement: The Impact of Group Relations. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, L. R., & Lauckhardt, J. (2009). The development of citizenship. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed.). (Vol. 2, pp. 372–408). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, L. R., Torney-Purta, J., & Flanagan, C. A. (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

  • Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. A. (2005). The civic renewal movement: Community building and democracy in the United States. Kettering Foundation Press, Dayton, OH.

  • Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Syvertsen, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2011). Thirty year trends in U.S. adolescents' civic engagement: A story of changing participation and educational differences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 586–594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Syvertsen, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., & Metzger, A. (2015). Youth civic and character measures toolkit. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied developmental Science, 6(4), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C. H., & Wilkenfeld, B. (2007). Latino adolescents’ civic development in the United States: Research results from the IEA Civic Education Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(2), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., O'Driscoll, K., & Moore, C. (2014). The influence of empathic concern on prosocial behavior in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 425

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wray-Lake, L., Metzger, A., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2016). Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model comparisons, measurement, measurement invariance, and age differences. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/0.1080/10888691.2016.1205495.

  • Wray-Lake, L., & Sloper, M. A. (2016). Investigating general and specific links from adolescents’ perceptions of ecological assets to their civic actions. Applied Developmental Science, 20(4), 250–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. (2011). The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. In C. Flanagan, B. Christens (Vol. Eds.), L. Jensen & R. Larson (Series Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development 134, (11–25). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., McLaughlin, M., & Silbereisen, R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Boyd, M., Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010a). Active and engaged citizenship: Multi-group and longitudinal factorial analysis of an integrated construct of civic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9541-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Hart, D., Flanagan, C., Youniss, J., & Levine, P. (2010b). Developing civic engagement within a civic context. In M. Lamb & A. Freund (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (pp. 590–624). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Kawashima-Ginsberg, K., Lin, E. S., Lamb, M., Balsano, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Developmental trajectories of civic engagement across adolescence: Disaggregation of an integrated construct. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), 1207–1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Malanchuk, O., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Predicting positive citizenship from adolescence to young adulthood: The effects of a civic context. Applied Development Science, 12(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors' Contributions

A.M. conceived of the study, participated in its design and drafted the manuscript; L.A. helped to draft the manuscript, participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data; B.O. participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and helped draft the results; E.B. performed statistical analyses and participated in the conception of the study; A.S. and L.W.L. participated in the design and coordination of the study and were involved in revising the manuscript for critically important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation and the National Science Foundation. The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the values of these organizations.

Data Sharing Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Metzger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metzger, A., Alvis, L.M., Oosterhoff, B. et al. The Intersection of Emotional and Sociocognitive Competencies with Civic Engagement in Middle Childhood and Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 47, 1663–1683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0842-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0842-5

Keywords

Navigation