Abstract
Many studies have reported gaps between Latino and non-Latino adolescents in academic and political outcomes. The current study presents possible explanations for such gaps, both at the individual and school level. Hierarchical linear modeling is employed to examine data from 2,811 American ninth graders (approximately 14 years of age) who had participated in the IEA Civic Education study. Analyses of large data bases enable the consideration of individual characteristics and experiences, as well as the context of classrooms and schools. In comparison with non-Latino students, Latino adolescents report more positive attitudes toward immigrants’ rights but have lower civic knowledge and expected civic participation. These differences were apparent even when controlling for language, country of birth, and political discussions with parents. School characteristics that explain a portion of this gap include open classroom climate and time devoted to study of political topics and democratic ideals. Results are discussed within the framework of developmental assets and political socialization. Implications for educational policy and ways to use large data sets are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The countries testing the grade in which the majority of 14-year-olds are enrolled in the IEA Civic Education Study were Australia, Belgium (French speaking), Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong (SAR), Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. In the United States, ninth graders were tested in October, and the mean age of the sample was 14.7 years.
In each set, all level 2 predictors were centered on their grand mean, with the exception of whether the school had high or low Latino enrollment. This was done to facilitate interpretation of the intercept as the average score for schools with low Latino enrollment, considering all other variables at their averages. Additionally, all level 1 variables were entered centered on their grand mean. This allows for the effects of these individual variables to be completely addressed both within and across schools. (Had the variables been group-mean centered, individual variables would have only controlled for the variation within schools that could be attributed to these predictors.) Because of this centering, however, it is important to remember that the addition of individual predictors can influence school predictors. What follows should not be considered separate but concurrent analyses of individual and average scores of knowledge, voting expectations, and immigrant attitudes. Rather, they should be considered singular analyses providing pictures of how school characteristics and individual experiences simultaneously impact the civic development of young people.
In order to facilitate the modeling of the gap between Latino and non-Latino students, Latino ethnicity was centered on its group mean, rather than its grand mean, when entered into the analysis.
References
Amadeo J, Torney-Purta J, Lehmann R, Husfeldt V, Nikolova R (2002) Civic knowledge and engagement: An IEA study of upper secondary students in sixteen countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. [Available: http://www.wam.umd.edu/∼iea]
Baldi S, Perie M, Skidmore D, Greenberg E, Hahn C (ed) (2001) What democracy means to ninth graders: U.S. results from the IEA Civic Education Study. National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, DC
Balsano AB (2005) Youth civic engagement in the United States: Understanding and addressing the impact of social impediments on positive youth and community development. Appl Dev Sci 9:188–201
Barreto MA, Muñoz JA (2003) Reexamining the “Politics of in-between”: Political participation among Mexican immigrants in the United States. Hispanic J Behav Sci 25:427–447
Benson P, Pittmann K (2001) Trends in youth development: Visions realities, and challenges. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Berry J, Phinney J, Sam D, Vedder P (eds) (2006) Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Bloomberg L, Ganey A, Alba V, Quintero G, Alcantra LA (2003) Chicano-Latino Youth Leadership Institute: An asset-based program for youth. Am J Health Behav 27:S45–S54
Calderón M (1998) Adolescent sons and daughters of immigrants: How schools can respond. In: Borman K, Schneider B (eds) The adolescent years: Social influences and educational challenges: Ninety-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. The National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL
Call KT, Mortimer JT (2002) Arenas of comfort in adolescence: A study of adjustment in context. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Diaz J (2005) School attachment among Latino youth in rural Minnesota. Hispanic J Behav Sci 27:300–318
Driever SL (2004) Latinos in polynucleated Kansas City. In: Arreola DD (ed) Hispanic spaces, Hispanic places. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
French SE, Seidman E, Allen L, Aber JL (2006) The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. Dev Psychol 42:1–10
Fuligni AJ, Hardway C (2004) Preparing diverse adolescents for the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children: Children of Immigrant Families (vol. 14). Retrieved May 17, 2006 from www.futureofchildren.org
Gandara P (2005) Fragile futures: Risk and vulnerability among Latino high achievers. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Garcia JA (1997) Political participation: Resources and involvement among Latinos in the American political system. In: Garcia FC (ed) Pursuing power: Latinos and the political system. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
Gonzales MH, Riedel E, Avery PG, Sullivan JL (2001) Rights and obligations in civic education: a content analysis of the National Standards for Civics and Government. Theory Res Soc Educ 29(1):109–128
Hahn C, Torney-Purta J (1999) The IEA Civic Education Project: National and international perspectives. Soc Educ 65(7):425–431
Hahn C (2001) Student views of democracy: The good and bad news. Soc Educ 65:456–460
Hart D, Atkins R (2002) Civic competence in urban youth. Appl Dev Sci 6:227–236
Hovey JD (2000) Psychosocial predictors of acculturative stress in Mexican immigrants. J Psychol 134:490–502
Husfeldt V, Barber C, Torney-Purta J (2005) Students’ social attitudes and expected political participation: New scales in the enhanced database of the IEA Civic Education Study. College Park, MD: Civic Education Data and Researcher Services, Department of Human Development, University of Maryland College Park. Retrieved July 20, 2006 from http://www.wam.umd.edu/∼iea
Jessor R, Turbin MS, Costa FM (1998) Risk and protection in successful outcomes among disadvantaged adolescents. Appl Dev Sci 2:194–208
Jones CJ, Trickett EJ (2005) Immigrant adolescents behaving as culture brokers: A study of families from the former Soviet Union. J Soc Psychol 145:405–427
Laosa L (1989) Psychological stress, coping, and the development of the Hispanic immigrant child. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Larson R, Hansen D (2005) The development of strategic thinking: Learning to impact human systems in a youth activism program. Hum Dev 48:327–349
Lee J (2002) Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity. Educ Res 31(1):3–12.
Lerner RM, Fischer CB, Weinberg RA (2000) Toward a science for and of the people: Promoting civil society through the application of developmental science. Child Dev 71:11–20
Lopez MH (2003, March). Electoral engagement among Latino youth. College Park, MD: The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Retrieved January 18, 2006 from http://www.civicyouth.org
McDevitt M (2006) The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. Int J Public Opin Res 18:67–70
Pedersen S, Seidman E, Yoshikawa H, Rivera AC, Allen L, Aber JL (2005) Contextual competence: Multiple manifestations among urban adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 35:65–82
Pittman KJ, Irby M, Tolman J, Yohalem N, Ferber T (2001) Preventing problems, promoting development, encouraging encouragement: Competing priorities or inseparable goals? Forum for Youth Investment, Takoma Park, MD
Porter N (2006) Report of the APA expert summit on immigration: Immigration policy is child policy. The Advocate 29(1):7–8
Ramos-Zayas A (2003) National performances: The politics of class, race and space in Puerto-Rican Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon R (2004) HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL
Reimers F (2005, August). An incomplete education. Civic education of immigrant students in the United States. Paper presented at the conference on Education and Democracy in the Americas, San Jose, Costa Rica
Rodriguez M, Morrobel D (2004) A review of Latino youth development research and a call for an asset orientation. Hispanic J Behav Sci 26(2):107–127
Roscigno VJ (2000) Family-school inequality and African American/Hispanic achievement. Soc Probl 47:266–290
Roth J, Borbely CJ, Brooks-Gunn J (2003, October). Service-learning and positive youth development: How service-learning programs relate to the goals and processes of positive youth development. Paper presented at the Service-Learning and Developmental Science Conference, Colorado Springs, CO
Sanchez Jankowski M (1992). Ethnic identity and political consciousness in different social orders. In: Haste H, Torney-Purta J (eds) The development of political understanding: a new perspective. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Scales PC, Benson PL, Leffert N, Blyth DA (2000) Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Appl Dev Sci 4:27–46
Schildkraut D (2005) The rise and fall of political engagement among Latinos: The role of identity and perceptions of discrimination. Pol Behav 27(3):285–312
Schmid CL (2001) Educational achievement, language-minority students, and the new second generation. Sociol Educ 74: 71–87
Schulz W, Sibberns H (2004) Technical report for the IEA Civic Education Study. IEA, Amsterdam
Search Institute (n.d.). Asset Categories. Retrieved May 19, 2006 from http://www.search-institute.org/assets
Steiner-Khamsi G, Torney-Purta J, Schwille J (ed) (2002) New paradigms and recurring paradoxes in education for citizenship, vol. 5. Elsevier Science, Oxford
Stepick A, Stepick CD (2002) Becoming American, constructing ethnicity: Immigrant youth and civic engagement. Appl Dev Sci 6:246–257
Tienda M, Mitchell F (eds) (2006) Hispanics and the future of America. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC
Torney-Purta J (2002) The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Appl Dev Sci 6:203–212
Torney-Purta J, Barber C, Wilkenfeld B (in press) Differences in the civic knowledge and attitudes of U.S. adolescents by immigrant status and Hispanic background. Prospects
Torney-Purta J, Homana G, Barber C (2006, April). Young people’s social and political attitudes and communities of practice in four countries. In: Veugelers W (Chair) Human development and citizenship. Paper symposium at the American Education Research Association annual conference, San Francisco, CA
Torney-Purta J, Lehmann R, Oswald H, Schulz W (2001) Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement. [Available: http://www.wam.umd.edu/∼iea]
Torney-Purta J, Schwille J, Amadeo J (1999) Civic education across countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA civic education project. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Amsterdam
Torney-Purta J, Vermeer Lopez S (2006) Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarten through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators. Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2002). Voting and registration in the election of November 2000. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 9, 2006 from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p20-542.pdf
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2003). Young, diverse, urban. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 9, 2006 from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2003/cb03-100.html
Walsh CE (1987) Schooling and the civic exclusion of Latinos: Toward a discourse of dissonance. J Educ 169:115–131
Acknowledgments
The collection of data for the IEA Civic Education Study in the United States was supported by the National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Some of the analysis reported here was supported by the William T. Grant Foundation and by the Carnegie Corporation of New York through CIRCLE (the Center for Research on Civic Learning and Engagement). The authors are grateful for comments on early versions to Fernando Reimers and to participants in the Workshop on Multilevel Models of Civic Engagement (held in May 2006 at the University of Minnesota’s Center for the Study of Political Psychology). The full international data set (including scales and documentation) is available on a CD-Rom (see information about ordering a free copy on http://www.wam.umd.edu/∼iea). Information about obtaining the U.S. data set can be obtained from http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/cived.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Professor of Human Development at the University of Maryland, College Park. She received her Ph.D. in Human Development from the University of Chicago. Her major research interests include the development of social and civic attitudes among adolescents across nations and the political engagement of college students. She received the Decade of Behavior Research Award in Democracy in 2005
Doctoral Candidate in Human Development at the University of Maryland, College Park, specializing in Educational Psychology. Her major research interests include modeling and other techniques suitable for analyzing large data sets, and also gifted and talented students
Doctoral Student in Human Development at the University of Maryland, College Park, specializing in Developmental Science. A former Peace Corps volunteer, her major research interests include positive youth development among minority adolescents
Appendices
Appendix A
Summary of variables
Outcome variables
Civic knowledge: Total civic knowledge scale, comprised of both content knowledge and interpretative skills items (IRT: see Schulz and Sibberns, 2004). International Mean = 100, SD=20.
Expectations of informed voting: Two-item IRT scale (Husfeldt et al., 2005; Schulz and Sibberns, 2004). International Mean = 10, SD=2.
Positive attitudes toward immigrants’ rights: Five-item scale of individual’s attitudes toward political and social rights of immigrants (IRT: see Schulz and Sibberns, 2004). International Mean = 10, SD=2.
Latino ethnicity predictors
Latino ethnicity: Student’s report that they are of Latino ethnicity (recoded from national options: 1=yes; 0=no).
High Latino school: School has more Latino students in the school’s sampled class than average across all schools in the sample. Created from aggregated student data (recoded 1=high Latino concentration; 0 = low Latino concentration).
Individual covariate predictors
Not born in country of test: Student’s report that they were not born in the United States; i.e., that they are a first-generation immigrant (recoded from part 2, item 4: 1=not born in U.S.; 0=born in U.S.).
Speak language of test: Student’s report that they always speak the language of the test (English) at home (recoded from part 2, item 6: 1=yes; 0=no).
Home background
Read news in the newspaper: Reports that they read about national news in the newspaper (recoded from item L7: 1=yes; 0=no).
Discuss political topics with parents: Composite scale of frequency with which students discuss topics with their parents from items L2, L5: Mean = 0, SD=1.
* Suburban locale: Location in the suburbs (recoded from national option in school questionnaire: 1=in suburbs; 0=in urban or rural area).
School variables
Perception of Open classroom climate: Individual student perception that their classroom is open to discussion of political topics (IRT: Schulz and Sibberns, 2004). International Mean = 10, SD=2.
Studies political topics in the classroom: Individual studied topics related to national politics in social studies class (from latent class analysis of national options items: 1 = likely to have studied these topics; 0 = unlikely to have studied these topics).
* Teachers’ use of interactive activities: Teacher questionnaire report of the extent to which they use activities in their class that require student interaction, such as role-playing or group reports (from confirmatory factor analysis of teacher items I2, I5, and I6). Mean = 0, SD=1. Missing data are imputed by taking the average score from schools from the same locale (urban/suburban/rural) and region (northeast/southeast/central/west).
* Teachers’ use of official materials in planning: Teacher questionnaire reports of the importance of official curriculum requirements in planning civics classes (recoded from confirmatory factor analysis of teacher items G1 and G2: 1=important; 0=not important). Missing data are imputed randomly, while preserving the ratio of teachers who do use official materials to those who do not.
* Average perception of open classroom climate: School average of students’ perceptions of an open classroom climate for discussion (aggregated from student IRT).
* Average parent education: School average of students’ reports of their mothers’ and fathers’ education (aggregated from part 2, item 12 of student survey). Mean = 0, SD=1.
* Level 2 variable
Note: Cases with missing data on student-level variables were deleted from the analysis on an analysis-by-analysis basis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C.H. & Wilkenfeld, B. Latino Adolescents’ Civic Development in the United States: Research Results from the IEA Civic Education Study. J Youth Adolescence 36, 111–125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9121-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9121-y