Abstract
Emergent technologies are commonly characterized as involving cutting-edge developments while lacking wide-scale public implementation. Although currently prevalent in many applications, gene technology is often considered emergent in that the science changes so rapidly. Science educators at all levels of formal education are faced with a unique challenge of facilitating student understanding of gene technology (in comparison with more established content) as well as integrating some of the more controversial socioscientific aspects of such content into the curricula. Much of the literature regarding student understanding of biotechnology has focused on development of student attitudes toward the field and the impact of this on their learning. However, there has, of yet, been no unifying framework in the literature regarding what is meant by attitudes toward gene technology. This article reviews the current scholarship (38 empirical studies published between 1990 and 2011) on the measurement of student attitudes toward biotechnology in order to highlight major themes present within the literature. Items from all reviewed studies were collected, coded, and sorted for construction of a comprehensive instrument representing the conceptualizations of attitudes toward gene technology in all 38 studies. Factor analytic techniques were used as a tool to reduce and categorize measurement items. Results provided a framework of five factors that help describe student attitudes toward biotechnology across all the studies. This emergent framework of factors is proposed as a useful means to standardize the discourse in future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
*Indicates references used in the analysis
Bahri NM, Suryawati E, Osman K (2014) Students’ biotechnology literacy: the pillars of STEM education in Malaysia. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 10(3):195–207
*Bal S, Samanci NK, Bozkurt O (2007) University students’ knowledge and attitude about genetic engineering. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 3(2):119–126
*Batrinou AM, Spiliotis V, Sakellaris G (2008) Acceptability of genetically modified maize by young people. Br Food J 110(3):250–259
*Chen S-Y, Raffan J (1999) Biotechnology: student’s knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. J Biol Educ 34(1):17–23
Condit CM (2010) Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 11:339–359
*Crne-Hladnik H, Peklaj C, Kosmelj K, Hladnik A, Javornik B (2009) Assessment of Slovene secondary school students’ attitudes to biotechnology in terms of usefulness, moral acceptability and risk perception. Public Underst Sci 18(6):747–758
*Dawson V (2007) An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understanding of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res Sci Educ 37:59–73
*Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003) Western high school students attitudes toward biotechnology processes. J Biol Educ 38(1):7–12
*Dawson V, Soames C (2006) The effect of biotechnology education on Australian high school students’ understanding and attitudes about biotechnology processes. Res Sci Technol Educ 24(2):183–198
*Erdogan M, Ozel M, Usak M, Prokop P (2009) Development and validation of an instrument to measure University students’ biotechnology attitude. J Sci Educ Technol 18:255–264
Erdogan M, Ozel M, BouJaoude S, Lamanauskas V, Usak M, Prokop P (2012) Assessment of science teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes regarding biotechnology: a cross-cultural comparison. J Baltic Sci Educ 11(1):78–93
*Finke MS, Kim H (2003) Attitudes about genetically modified foods among Korean and American college students. AgBioForum 6(4):191–197
Fonesca MJ, Costa P, Lencastre L, Tavares F (2012) Multidimensional analysis of high-school students’ perceptions about biotechnology. J Biol Educ 46(3):129–139
*Fritz S, Husmann D, Wingenbach G, Rutherford T, Egger V, Wadhwa P (2003) Awareness and acceptance of biotechnology issues among youth, undergraduates, and adults. AgBioForum 6(4):178–184
Gardner GE, Jones MG (2010) Science instructors’ perceptions of the risks of biotechnology: implications for science education. Res Sci Educ 41:711–738
Gardner GE, Jones MG, Taylor A, Forrester J, Robertson, L (2010) Students’ risk perceptions of nanotechnology applications. Int J Sci Educ 32(14):1951−1969
Gaskell G et al (2000) Biotechnology and the European public. Nat Biotechnol 18:935–938
*Gunter B, Kinderlerer J, Beyleveld D (1996) Teenagers and biotechnology: a survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Stud Sci Educ 32(1):81–112
Herodotou C, Kyza EA, Nicolaidou I, Hadjichambis A, Kafouris D, Terzian F (2012) The development and validation of the GMOAS, an instrument measuring secondary school students’ attitudes towards genetically modified organisms. Int J Sci Educ B Commun Public Engagem 2(2):131–147
*Hill R, Stanisstreet M, Boyes E, O’Sullivan H (1998) Reactions to a new technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Res Sci Technol Educ 16(2):203–216
*Hill R, Stanisstreet M, O’Sullivan H, Boyes E (1999a) Genetic engineering of animals for medical research: students’ views. Sch Sci Rev 80(293):23–30
*Hill R, Stanisstreet M, Boyes E, O’Sullivan H (1999b) Genetically engineered foodstuffs: school students views. Int J Environ Stud 56(6):785–799
Johnstone AH, Reid N (1981) Towards a model for attitude change. Eur J Sci Educ 3(2):205–212
*Jordahl R (1993) Attitudes of Prairie Bible College students toward human genetic manipulation: a survey and comparative study. ERIC 368:619
*Kidman G (2009) Attitudes and interests towards biotechnology: the mismatch between students and teachers. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 5(2):135–143
*Kitto SL, Griffiths LG, Pesek JD (2003) A long term study of knowledge, risk, and ethics for students enrolled in an introductory biotechnology course. J Anim Sci 81:1348–1353
*Klop T, Severiens S (2007) An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: a study among Dutch secondary school students. Int J Sci Educ 5(2):663–679
*Klop T, Severiens S, Knippels M-CPJ, van Mil MHW, Ten Dam GTM (2010) Effects of a science education module on attitudes towards modern biotechnology of secondary school students. Int J Sci Educ 9(1):1127–1150
Kurzweil R (2001) The law of accelerating returns. Retrieved from http://www.kurdzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1 on April 14, 2011
*Lamanauskas V, Makarskaite-Petkeviciene R (2008) Lithuanian University students’ knowledge of biotechnology and attitudes to the taught subject. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 4(3):269–277
Laugksch RC (2000) Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Sci Educ 84:71–94
*Laux CM, Mosher GA, Freeman SA (2010) Factors affecting college students’ knowledge and opinions of genetically modified foods. J Technol Stud 36(2):2–9
*Lock R, Miles C (1993) Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students’ knowledge and attitudes. J Biol Educ 27(4):267–273
*Lock R, Miles C, Hughes S (1995) The influence of teaching on knowledge and attitudes in biotechnology and genetic engineering contexts: implications for teaching controversial issues and public understanding of science. Sch Sci Rev 76(276):47–59
*Massarani L, de Castro Moreira I (2005) Attitudes towards genetics: a case study among Brazilian high school students. Public Underst Sci 14:201–212
*Mohapatra AK, Priyadarshini D, Biswas A (2010) Genetically modified food: knowledge and attitude of teachers and students. J Sci Educ Technol 19:489–497
*Olsher G, Dreyfus A (1999) The ‘ostension-teaching’ approach as a means to develop junior high student attitudes towards biotechnologies. J Biol Educ 34(1):25–31
Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25(9):1049–1079
*Ozel M, Erdogan M, Usak M, Prokop P (2009) High school students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology applications. Educ Sci Theory Pract 9(1):321–328
Priest SH (2000) US public opinion divided over biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 18:939–942
*Prokop P, Leskova A, Kubiatko M, Diran C (2007) Slovakian students’ knowledge of an attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 29(7):895–907
Ramaley JA, Haggett RR (2005) Engaged and engaging science: a component of a good liberal education. Peer Rev 7:8–12
Reid N (2006) Thoughts on attitude measurement. Res Sci Technol Educ 24(1):3–27
Roberts DA (2007) Scientific literacy/science literacy. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 729–780
*Saez MJ, Nino AG, Carretero A (2008) Matching society values: students’ views of biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 30(2):167–183
*Saher M, Lindeman M, Hursti U-KK (2006) Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods. Appetite 46:324–331
Sandler R (2009) Nanotechnology: the social and ethical issues. Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659–667
*Seethaler S, Linn M (2004) Genetically modified food in perspective: an inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. Int J Sci Educ 26(14):1765–1785
Smith JE (2001) Public perception of biotechnology. In: Ratledge C, Kristiansen B (eds) Basic biotechnology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–16
Snyder M, Du J, Gerstein M (2010) Personal genome sequencing: current approach and challenges. Genes Dev 24:423–431
*Sorgo A, Ambrozic-Dolinsek J (2010) Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among prospective teachers of biology, home economics, and grade school in Slovenia. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 38(3):141–150
*Sterling LG, Halbrendt CK, Kitto SL (1993) Impact of education on the attitudes of college students toward biotechnology. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(1):75–88
*Surmeli H, Sahin F (2010) Examination of university students’ attitudes towards biotechnological studies in terms of faculty and gender variables. Procedia 2:3999–4005
Trefil J (2008) Why science?. National Science Teacher Association Press, Arlington, VA
Turner S (2008) School science and its controversies: or whatever happened to scientific literacy? Public Underst Sci 17:55–72
*Usak M, Erdogan M, Prokop P, Ozel M (2009) High school and university students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 37(2):123–130
Van Eijk M, Roth W-M (2011) Cultural diversity in science education through novelization: against the epicization of science and cultural centralization. J Res Sci Teach 48(7):824–847
Volet S, Vauras M (eds) (2013) Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: methodological advances. Routledge, New York, NY
*Wingenbach GJ, Rutherford TA, Dunsford DW (2002) Selected college students’ knowledge and perceptions of biotechnology issues in the mass media. J Appl Commun 86(3):7–23
*Wingenbach GJ, Rutherford TA, Dunsford DW (2003) Agricultural communications students’ awareness and perceptions of biotechnology issues. J Agric Educ 44(4):80–93
Zeilder DL, Herman BC, Ruzek M, Linder A, Lin S-S (2013) Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. J Res Sci Teach 50(2):251–283
Acknowledgments
Timothy Darden, Danielle Johnson-Young, students who help gather and input the data on the literature provided in this review as well as validate some of the items.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gardner, G.E., Troelstrup, A. Students’ Attitudes Toward Gene Technology: Deconstructing a Construct. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 519–531 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9542-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9542-4