Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insights into Students’ Conceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study has reviewed the last two decades of student conception research in solution chemistry pertaining to aims, methods of exploring students’ conception, general knowledge claims, students’ conceptions and difficulties, and conceptual change studies. The aims of solution chemistry studies have been to assess students’ understanding level of solution chemistry and in some studies compare understanding based on age and year at school or college. The methods of exploring students’ conceptions consisted of interviews, paper and pencil surveys (open-ended questions and multiple-choice questions), free writing and drawings and the validity of these methods have been highlighted. The general knowledge claims synthesized in this study are students’ (a) attending to mechanical events, (b) preference for everyday language usage over chemical language, (c) confusing solution chemistry with non-related concepts, (d) lack of sub-microscopic explanation for macroscopic observation, (e) difficulty with visualizing and representing sub-microscopic ideas, (f) difficulty with symbolic representations, (g) inconsistent explanations, (h) development of student understanding with age, and (i) development of conservation reasoning with age. To incorporate students’ conceptions, conceptual change studies have used strategies such as worksheet, analogy, collaboratively working with a teacher, hypermedia, and group exploration. The results of conceptual change studies generally have had a positive impact enabling students to consider their ideas and develop plausible models of solution chemistry. For improvement of student learning in chemistry, this review of solution chemistry studies sheds light on teacher thinking and capacity building with respect to explicitly incorporating students’ conceptions into chemistry curriculum; practicing research-based strategies; forging links among types of chemical knowledge; collaborating for experimental teaching; and conducting further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M. R., Gryzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., and Marek, A. E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29: 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., and Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding five concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31: 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B. (1984). Chemical Reactions. Report: Elevperspektiv, Number 12, University of Göteborg, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B. (1992). Pupils’ conception of matter and its transformations. In Lijnse, P. L., Licht, P., De Vos, W. A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles, A Central Problem in Secondary Science Education, University of Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausebel, D. P., Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1986). Educational Pschology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayas, A., and Coştu, B. (2002). Levels of understanding of the evaporation concept at secondary stage. The First International Education Conference, Changing Times Changing Needs, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa-Northern Cyprus.

  • Ayas, A., and Demirbaş, A. (1997). Turkish secondary students’ conception of introductory chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education 74: 518–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayas, A., Köse, S., and Taş, E. (2002). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on misconceptions about photosynthesis. The First International Education Conference, Changing Times Changing Needs, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa-Northern Cyprus.

  • Barker, V., and Millar, R. (1999). Students’ reasoning about chemical reactions: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education 21: 645–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, A., and Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils’ views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: A cross-age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education 19: 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A., Briggs, H., and Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of Secondary Students’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter, Center for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, Leeds, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, M., and Osborne, R. (1981). Physical Change (Working Paper No. 26), Learning in Science Project, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education 3: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., and Russell, T. (1982). An Investigation of the Ideas of Heat Temperature and Change of State of Children Aged Between 8 and 14 Years, Unpublished Paper, University of Leeds.

  • Duschl, R., and Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education 38: 39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V. (1991). Students’ Conceptions of Solubility: A Teacher–Researcher Collaborative Study, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

  • Ebenezer, J. V., and Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education 79: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., and Erickson, L. G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: A phenomenograpy. Science Education 80: 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J., and Haggerty, S. (1999). Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  • Ebenezer, J. (2001). A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: Animation of the solution process of table salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology 10: 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., and Fraser, M. D. (2001). First year chemical engineering students’ conception of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction. Science Education 85: 509–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P., and Fensham, N. (1987). Description and frameworks of solutions and reactions in solutions. Research in Science Education 17: 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. L. (1992). Modeling with magnets – A unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, March, 58–63.

  • Garnett, J. P., and Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation–reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29: 687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennaro, E. D. (1981). Assessing junior high students’ understanding of density and solubility. School Science and Mathematics 81: 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, J. R., and Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education 66: 623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. K., Thomey, K., Cooke, B., and Normore, G. (1988). Remediation of student-specific misconception relating to three science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25: 709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. K. (1994). A critical analysis and synthesis of research on chemistry misconceptions. In Schmidt, H.-J. (Ed.), Proceedings of The 1994 International Symposium Problem Solving And Misconceptions in Chemistry And Physics, ICASE (The International Council of Associations For Science Education) Publications, pp. 70–99.

  • Goodwin, A. (2002). Is salt melting when it dissolves in water? Journal of Chemical Education 79: 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidar, A. H., and Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 919–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., and Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education 84: 352–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education 15: 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. J. (1987). Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Change, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, E. Lansing.

  • Holding, B. (1987). Investigation of School Children’s Understandings of the Process of Dissolving With Special Reference to the Conservation of Matter and the Development of Atomistic Ideas, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds.

  • Inspiration Software (1997). Inspiration (version 5.0), Inspiration Software, Portland, OR.

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computerized Assisted Learning 7: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., and Scott, P. (1991). Diagnostic teaching in the science classroom: Teaching/learning strategies to promote development in understanding about conservation of mass on dissolving. Research in Science and Technological Education 9, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P. (1998). Progression in children’s understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education 20: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaartinen, S., and Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction 12: 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabapinar, F., Leach, J., and Scott, P. (2004). The design and evaluation of a teaching–learning sequence addressing the solubility concept with Turkish secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education 26: 635–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D., and Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Ebenezer, J., and Fraser, D. M. (2002). Structural characteristics of university engineering students’ conceptions of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., and Ebenezer, J. (2002). Descriptive categories and structural characteristics of students’ conceptions: An exploration of the relationship. Research in Science and Technological Education 20: 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longden, K., Black, P., and Solomon, J. (1991). Children’s interpretation of dissolving. International Journal of Science Education 13: 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., and Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

  • McComas, W. F., and Almazroa, H. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science and Education 7: 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Curriculum Framework and Science Benchmarks (2000). http://www.misd.net/MIBIG.

  • Miller, H., and Hunn, G. D. (2001). Using group discussions to improve social problem-solving and learning. Education 121: 470–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing Science Understanding, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, D. R., and Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education 79: 739–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 69: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future (1996, September). What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future, Author, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1998). Pursuing Excellence: A Study of U.S. Twelfth-Grade Mathematics and Science Teaching, Learning, Curriculum, and Achievement in International Context, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1998). A Lakotasian conceptual change teaching strategy based on student ability to build models with varying degrees of conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Science and Education 7: 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconception. International Journal of Science Education 23: 707–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., and Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 825–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., and Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education 67: 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özmen, H., and Ayas, A. (2003). Students’ difficulties in understanding of the conservation of matter in open and closed-system chemical reactions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice 4: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. F., and Treagust, D. F. (1989). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure. Journal of Chemical Education 66: 459–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pnarbaşi, T., and Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education 80: 1328–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1974). The Child’s Construction of Quantities, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  • Prieto, T., Blanco, A., and Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14-year-old students about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education 11: 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, A. L., and West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a source of knowledge framework. Science Education 70: 583–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiles-Pardo, J., and Solaz-Portolés, J. J.(1995). Students and teachers misapplication of Le Chatelier’s Principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 939–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, J. M. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education 19: 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravialo, A. (2001). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education 78: 629–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renström, L. (1988). Conceptions of Matter: A Phenomenography Approach. PhD dissertation, Gothenburg University Press.

  • Schmidt, H. J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions – Looking for a pattern. Science Education 81: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., and Metz, P. A. (1996). Evaluating student understanding of solution chemistry through microscopic representations. Journal of Chemical Education 73: 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R. (1988). Children’s conception of gas. International Journal of Science Education 20: 553–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R. (1990). Pupils’ problems in understanding conservation of matter. International Journal of Science Education 12: 501–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities?: A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education 4: 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., and Coll, R. (1997). The use of analogy in the teaching of solubility to pre-service primary teachers. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal 43: 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., and Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education 25: 1353–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (1999). Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning laboratory activities. Science Education 83: 654–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 1: 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsman, A. L., and Hewson, P. W. (1986). Effect of instruction using microcomputer simulations and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, S. L., and Marek, A. E. (1991). A cross-age study of understanding of the concept diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., and Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding, The Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, Fatih Faculty of Education, KTU, 61335 Söğütlü, Trabzon, Turkey

    Muammer Çalýk & Alipaşa Ayas

  2. Teacher Education, Division College of Education, Wayne State University, Room 299, 441 Education Building, 5425 Gullen Mall, Detroit, Michigan, 48202

    Jazlin V. Ebenezer

Authors
  1. Muammer Çalýk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alipaşa Ayas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jazlin V. Ebenezer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muammer Çalýk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çalýk, M., Ayas, A. & Ebenezer, J.V. A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insights into Students’ Conceptions. J Sci Educ Technol 14, 29–50 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2732-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2732-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation