Abstract
It is widely acknowledged both that students experience learning difficulties when taught about the submicroscopic structural models that are central to the theoretical basis of modern chemistry, and that students commonly develop alternative conceptions in this topic. This chapter reviews the claim that learners commonly acquire an alternative conceptual framework for thinking about the molecular world from secondary school chemistry teaching. This conceptual framework is based around the notion that chemical processes are driven by the needs of atoms to fill their electron shells. This ‘full-shells explanatory principle’ appears to be the core element around which students develop an understanding of chemical bonding, stability and ionisation, and what occurs during chemical reactions. That is, a range of common alternative conceptions can be seen to form part of a coherent way of making sense of teaching about chemistry at the submicroscopic scale. This octet alternative conceptual framework acts as an impediment to progression in learning chemistry. The chapter outlines the conceptual framework as it was originally characterised in the English curriculum context and reviews evidence from studies in other parts of the world that suggest that this alternative conceptual framework is a significant learning impediment in diverse educational contexts. The chapter considers the nature, and likely origins, of this common core to student conceptions and suggests that implicit knowledge elements, which inform student thinking at preconscious levels, are significant in the genesis of this way of thinking. Further research is needed to better understand the development of student thinking about the molecular world, but our current understanding of the origins of ‘octet thinking’ among students indicates that common teaching approaches need to be modified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 401–420. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9054-9.
Andersson, B. (1986). The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 155–171.
Brewer, W. F. (2008). Naïve theories of observational astronomy: Review, analysis, and theoretical implications. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 155–204). New York: Routledge.
Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.
Butts, B., & Smith, R. (1987). HSC chemistry students’ understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds. Research in Science Education, 17, 192–201.
Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 131–134.
Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models in science (Vol. XV, pp. 129–186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Claxton, G. (1993). Minitheories: A preliminary model for learning science. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s informal ideas in science (pp. 45–61). London: Routledge.
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 171–191.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ mental models of chemical bonding. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 357–382.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464–486.
Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gu, Q. (2008). Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work, and effectiveness: From integration to synergy. Educational Researcher, 37(6), 330–342. doi:10.3102/0013189X08324091.
diSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15–33). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105–225.
diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29–60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science Education. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
Gilbert, J. K. (1995). Studies and fields: Directions of research in science education. Studies in Science Education, 25, 173–197. doi:10.1080/03057269508560053.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623–633.
Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628.
Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352–381.
Henderleiter, J., Smart, R., Anderson, J., & Elian, O. (2001). How do organic chemistry students understand and apply hydrogen bonding? Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1126–1130.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of ‘the atom’. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1009.
Kuiper, J. (1994). Student ideas of science concepts: Alternative frameworks? International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 279–292.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Levy Nahum, T., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Bar-Dov, Z. (2004). Can final examinations amplify students’ misconceptions in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 301–325.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 114–122.
Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707–730.
Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers’ living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301–332.
Peterson, R., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument. Research in Science Education, 16, 40–48.
Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (1986). Intuitive theories – A researcher’s dilemma: Some practical methodological implications. British Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 153–166.
Pozo, J. I., & Gómez-Crespo, M. A. (2005). The embodied nature of implicit theories: The consistency of ideas about the nature of matter. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 351–387.
Schmidt, H.-J. (1991). A label as a hidden persuader: Chemists’ neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 459–471.
Sjøberg, S. (2010). Constructivism and learning. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 485–490). Oxford: Elsevier.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14(1), 63–82.
Taber, K. S. (1994). Misunderstanding the ionic bond. Education in Chemistry, 31(4), 100–103.
Taber, K. S. (1995). Development of student understanding: A case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(1), 87–97.
Taber, K. S. (1997). Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus electrostatic thinking? School Science Review, 78(285), 85–95.
Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597–608.
Taber, K. S. (1999a). Alternative conceptual frameworks in chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 36(5), 135–137.
Taber, K. S. (1999b). An explanatory model for conceptual development during A-level chemistry. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001429.htm
Taber, K. S. (1999c). Ideas about ionisation energy: A diagnostic instrument. School Science Review, 81(295), 97–104.
Taber, K. S. (2000a). Case studies and generalisability – Grounded theory and research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 469–487.
Taber, K. S. (2000b). Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 399–417.
Taber, K. S. (2001). Shifting sands: A case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 731–753.
Taber, K. S. (2002a). Chemical misconceptions – Prevention, diagnosis and cure: Classroom resources (Vol. 2). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. S. (2002b). Chemical misconceptions – Prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (Vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. S. (2003a). Lost without trace or not brought to mind? – A case study of remembering and forgetting of college science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(3), 249–277.
Taber, K. S. (2003b). Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner’s prior learning. Science Education, 87, 732–758.
Taber, K. S. (2003c). Understanding ionisation energy: Physical, chemical and alternative conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(2), 149–169.
Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116.
Taber, K. S. (2008a). Conceptual resources for learning science: Issues of transience and grain-size in cognition and cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1027–1053. doi:10.1080/09500690701485082.
Taber, K. S. (2008b). Of models, mermaids and methods: The role of analytical pluralism in understanding student learning in science. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science education in the 21st century (pp. 69–106). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
Taber, K. S. (2009a). College students’ conceptions of chemical stability: The widespread adoption of a heuristic rule out of context and beyond its range of application. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1333–1358.
Taber, K. S. (2009b). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S., & García Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: Drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 99–142.
Taber, K. S., & Tan, K.-C. D. (2007). Exploring learners’ conceptual resources: Singapore A level students’ explanations in the topic of ionisation energy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 375–392. doi:10.1007/s10763-006-9044-9.
Taber, K. S., & Tan, K. C. D. (2011). The insidious nature of ‘hard core’ alternative conceptions: Implications for the constructivist research programme of patterns in high school students’ and pre-service teachers’ thinking about ionisation energy. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 259–297. doi:10.1080/09500691003709880.
Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (1996/2005). The secret life of the chemical bond: Students’ anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Science education: Major themes in education (Vol. 4, pp. 238–253). London/New York: Routledge.
Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (1997). Constructivism and concept learning in chemistry – Perspectives from a case study. Research in Education, 58, 10–20.
Taber, K. S., Tsaparlis, G., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2012). Student conceptions of ionic bonding: Patterns of thinking across three European contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2843–2873.
Talanquer, V. (2006). Common sense chemistry: A model for understanding students’ alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 811–816.
Tan, K.-C. D., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Ionization energy: Implications of pre-service teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(5), 623–629.
Tan, K.-C. D., Taber, K. S., Goh, N.-K., & Chia, L.-S. (2005). The ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: A two-tier multiple choice instrument to determine high school students’ understanding of ionisation energy. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 6(4), 180–197.
Tan, K.-C. D., Taber, K. S., Liu, X., Coll, R. K., Lorenzo, M., Li, J., & Chia, L. S. (2008). Students’ conceptions of ionisation energy: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 263–283. doi:10.1080/09500690701385258.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Topper, D. (1990). Newton on the number of colours in the spectrum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(2), 269–279. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(90)90026-5.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. doi:10.1080/0950069880100204.
Ünal, S., Coştu, B., & Ayas, A. (2010). Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 3–29.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2013). A Common Core to Chemical Conceptions: Learners’ Conceptions of Chemical Stability, Change and Bonding. In: Tsaparlis, G., Sevian, H. (eds) Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5914-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5914-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5913-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5914-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)