Skip to main content
Log in

Facilitators and Barriers When Conducting Adult Health Programs Within the African American Church: A Systematic Review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the success of health programs conducted within African American (AA) churches, research has been limited in understanding facilitators and barriers that exist when conducting adult health programs within AA churches. Thus, the objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify these facilitators and barriers. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and studies that met the eligibility criteria were divided based on their focus: disease topic or behavior, health promotion activities, or church readiness. Facilitators and barriers were also stratified using the socioecological model. Out of 288 articles initially identified, only 29 were included. Facilitators and barriers were predominantly found at the intrapersonal and organizational level for disease topic or behavior studies, and at the organizational level for studies focused on health promotion activities and church readiness. None of the articles identified facilitators and barriers at the policy level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Gandara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics Approval

Since contact with human subjects was not a part of this systematic review, the authors were not required by the Texas A&M IRB Office.

Availability of Data and Material

The data and materials presented in this article comply with field standards.

Consent, Data, Materials, and/or Code availability

Since human subjects were not recruited for this systematic review, consent to participate was not asked. Code availability is not applicable in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

See Figs. 1 and 2.

Appendix A: Search Strategy

CINAHL Ebsco,

(MH "Churches") OR AB ( "faith based" or church* or (health n2 ministr*)) OR TI ( "faith based" or church* or (health n2 ministr*)) or AB ( clergy or pastor* or minister* or preacher* or (church n1 leader*)) OR TI ( clergy or pastor* or preacher* or minister* or (church n1 leader*))

AND

(MH "Blacks") OR AB ( (african n1 american*) or black*) OR TI ( (african n1 american*) or black*)

AND

TI (readiness or capacity or assessment) OR AB ( readiness or capacity or assessment)

Medline Complete,

(MH "Faith-Based Organizations + ") OR AB ( "faith based" or church* or (health n2 ministr*)) OR TI ("faith based" or church* or (health n2 ministr*)) or TI (clergy or pastor* or minister* or (church n1 leader*) or preacher*) or AB(clergy or pastor* or minister* or (church n1 leader*) or preacher*)

AND

(MH "African Americans") OR AB ( (african n1 american*) or black*) OR TI ( (african n1 american*) or black*)

AND

TI (readiness or capacity or assessment) OR AB (readiness or capacity or assessment)

Medline Ebsco, 1980–2019

(TI community n1 read* OR AB community n1 read*) OR (TI community n1 capacity OR AB community n1 capacity)

MMAT Tool Question Key

Screening Questions for all types

  • S1. Are there clear research questions?

  • S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions.

Qualitative studies

  • Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?

  • Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?

  • Are the findings adequately derived from the data?

  • Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?

  • Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?

Quantitative non-randomized studies

  • 3.1. Are the participants representative of the target population?

  • 3.2. Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and intervention (or exposure)?

  • 3.3. Are there complete outcome data?

  • 3.4. Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis?

  • 3.5. During the study period, is the intervention administered (or exposure occurred) as intended?

Mixed-method studies

  • 5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed-method design to address the research question?

  • 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?

  • 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?

  • 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?

  • 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?

See Tables 1, 2, 34, 5 and 6.

Table 2 Study characteristics
Table 3 Summary of facilitators by health topic
Table 4 Summary of facilitators and barriers for health promotion activities
Table 5 Summary of facilitators and barriers for church readiness
Table 6 Summary of barriers by health topic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gandara, E., Harvey, I.S., Foster, M. et al. Facilitators and Barriers When Conducting Adult Health Programs Within the African American Church: A Systematic Review. J Relig Health 62, 2496–2531 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01532-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01532-6

Keywords

Navigation